Mercedes-AMG is following the Ioniq 5 N playbook with simulated shifting and sounds.
See full article...
See full article...
Well, they haven't a natural sound so everything is fake. The choices are fake a sound that people are familiar with or fake a sound that people are unfamiliar with. I suppose there's also "no sound at all" but don't people generally prefer some sort of feedback? Eg, are you cross when smartphone keyboards make keyboard noises?EVs need their own sound, not some strange imitation of the lesser cars they're replacing.
And the closest we were going to get (Bolt and Leaf updates) are now delayed, again. I can see automakers wanting to make a profit per unit, and for EVs that still requires a higher price than similar ICE models, but by now the increment should be a lot smaller than it was 10 years ago.Mercedes specifically is solidly in the "want" category as a brand. This car is not for us mortals. But I agree with the sentiment of 'where tf are the cheap EVs, oh yea china is making them right now and i can't have one'
How about making jet engine sounds so you can make believe you're driving a Chrysler turbine car?Fake engine sounds are only a tiny step up from making “brum brum” noises yourself.
That's a good point. I've seen people with newish Mustangs (with a V8?) manage to kill it on a normal takeoff from a signal. How that's possible absent a gimpy clutch is beyond me (the V8 should be able to just idle away from the stop at a fair speed), having learned to drive in a 40hp VW on SF hills.All manuals should be banned in favour of this technology. Because it's electronic the 16 year old morons who buy manual to fake being a race car drivers can't stall out in front of me at every red light. Also because it's electronic it'll hit the brake lights instead of having the car in front of you suddenly lose 10km/hr without warning on the highway because they fucked up a shift. Always have at least 2-4 seconds of space in front of you folks...
Best description I've seen of the pedestrian warning sounds used these days is a chorus of depressed angels...Well, they haven't a natural sound so everything is fake. The choices are fake a sound that people are familiar with or fake a sound that people are unfamiliar with. I suppose there's also "no sound at all" but don't people generally prefer some sort of feedback? Eg, are you cross when smartphone keyboards make keyboard noises?
As for outside, when I'm walking, I appreciate that they don't generally sneak up on one unawares. However, the two sounds I usually notice are some sort of musical note as if I'm being stalked by an orchestra again or a wibbly noise reminiscent of Jetsons flying cars...neither of which I would consider good.
This is kind of off topic but fans of electric engines, trains, and transport might appreciate this fun fact. Montreal’s first metro cars were electric. They had a current chopper in them that made a specific sound when initializing motion, “doo-doo-DOO” (turn it up loud to hear), then “DOO-doo-doo” as the cars came to a stop. So when the old cars were being retired, Montreal synthesized the sound and made it the doors closing notification. This sound has become emblematic of the city of Montreal.EV’s need their own sound, not some strange imitation of the lesser cars they're replacing.
Lucid Air already has more than your desired rangeHonestly, I don’t even care about the five minutes part. Not being a trombone repairman, I have never in my life driven 900 miles with only a five minute stop.
I do kind of want the 400 mile battery, though - but that’s mostly because of one very specific ~350 mile drive I make twice a year up into central Wisconsin, to a cabin that only has 120v 15A power in the garage, for a week of driving up and down the peninsula where there also don’t seem to be many fast charging stations. Once the charging stations exist, any one of the current crop of EVs available for me to purchase has more than enough range, even knowing my pit stops will take 30 minutes instead of 20.
I want to be able to use music, preferably the "Ride of the Valkyries" from the "Apocalypse Now" movie.Best description I've seen of the pedestrian warning sounds used these days is a chorus of depressed angels...
It does. And I’m waiting to see the details on the Gravity Touring when it becomes available to order later this year. Much as I love the Air (in the abstract; I’ve not had the opportunity to drive one), once I went hatchback I lost my tolerance for the inconveniences of the sedan form factor.Lucid Air already has more than your desired range
https://insideevs.com/news/732101/2025-lucid-air-gt-range-test/
Yeah, but I've never had as much fun driving an auto as I have any MT. And paddle shift/sport shift autos are just autos that take requests. I've driven a few, and I've never been impressed. I've even autocrossed a McLaren, and walked away from that thinking I would've have more fun on that track in my Mazda3.This.
However other things being equal, a paddle shift/auto box laps faster, no matter how skilled our manual shifting might be. Anyone who has driven both types on a track confirms this. But alas, as manual shift cars slip gradually into the technological past, so does the discussion of their merits.
You can pry my MT from my cold dead hands.All manuals should be banned in favour of this technology. Because it's electronic the 16 year old morons who buy manual to fake being a race car drivers can't stall out in front of me at every red light. Also because it's electronic it'll hit the brake lights instead of having the car in front of you suddenly lose 10km/hr without warning on the highway because they fucked up a shift. Always have at least 2-4 seconds of space in front of you folks...
Might be their first MT. It's a mustang after all. All of us that can actually drive an MT had to learn at some point, and it probably wasn't pretty.That's a good point. I've seen people with newish Mustangs (with a V8?) manage to kill it on a normal takeoff from a signal. How that's possible absent a gimpy clutch is beyond me (the V8 should be able to just idle away from the stop at a fair speed), having learned to drive in a 40hp VW on SF hills.
My vote is for the flying car sounds from The JetsonsEVs need their own sound, not some strange imitation of the lesser cars they're replacing.
If we're doing EV sounds, I vote for "tram accelerating":If you want audible feedback, do something new! It's just speakers and maybe a rumble seat, so get creative! EVs need their own sound, not some strange imitation of the lesser cars they're replacing.
-Tim
That and the fact that dumping the clutch from idle in just about any car without a giant heavy flywheel is going to kill the engine...especially if it's a good clutch that actually bites.It
Might be their first MT. It's a mustang after all. All of us that can actually drive an MT had to learn at some point, and it probably wasn't pretty.
Mercedes is literally the only car brand that spans ALL categories from the cheapest barely accelerating models to the exclusive custom builds. Some of them are indeed in the "want" category, but that's hardly 10% of their product line.Mercedes specifically is solidly in the "want" category as a brand.
Personally, I would like it to sound like a SD70MACHow about making jet engine sounds so you can make believe you're driving a Chrysler turbine car?
Ah, I found my car parked in this one by the same YouTuber (a tram driver?):
View: https://youtu.be/X7KhqeDvZuk
Satisfying but strange to see it.
I always assumed that accelerating whine was the tram’s actual motors. So it’s a fake sound? Disappointing.
In Europe yeah, there are all sorts of commercial and povertys-spec passenger cars, but I think in the US they maintained a "fancy German luxy" brand vibe.Mercedes is literally the only car brand that spans ALL categories from the cheapest barely accelerating models to the exclusive custom builds. Some of them are indeed in the "want" category, but that's hardly 10% of their product line.
People complain about noise when the high displacement engine is loud. Antisocial behaviour they call it. So they make the speakers make the noise for the driver, where it won't bother anyone else. People still find a reason to complain about it.Every Mercedes-AMG with fake engine noise / gear shifts should be required, by law, to have the above sticker affixed in locations all over the body to warn others.
Because they are two different things. The first is people being assholes. The second is the audio equivalent of chrome-plated plastic. Fake AF, and it's obviously fake AF.People complain about noise when the high displacement engine is loud. Antisocial behaviour they call it. So they make the speakers make the noise for the driver, where it won't bother anyone else. People still find a reason to complain about it.
Like I said in my original post, I have no issues with the concept, especially if it brings more people across to EVs. And I definitely understand the "I want to be better against myself" discussion, but it's not really relevant here. You're still not comparing your times against someone else, you're just artificially limiting what you can achieve with the hardware you have.Because it is more fun - more engaging. I also understand people that want a DCT for track days even though the time is not relevant to other drivers. Will a track day driver notice a second or two better lap time because they went to a DCT? Maybe, but it is still lap times relative to all your other lap times and no one else's.
Not a valid comparison. That's like saying "why have a recreational vehicle when you can catch a Greyhound". Again, I understand the desire for recreational vehicles. But people who want to fly old-school Fokker biplanes, or Spitfires, or any other classic, don't buy the latest and greatest and then and just turn the settings down. They might do that for training purposes, but if you want the authenticity of an old WWI fighter you go and take a ride in a WWI fighter.Why do people have a GA license when they can fly commercial?
What I want to know is why a fake manual transmission is more engaging for you. It's something that I don't understand, so I'm genuinely curious as to the motivation.For me, I want to be engaged with the car.
And outside of this recreational feel of "engagement", what are the merits of a manual transmission?This.
However other things being equal, a paddle shift/auto box laps faster, no matter how skilled our manual shifting might be. Anyone who has driven both types on a track confirms this. But alas, as manual shift cars slip gradually into the technological past, so does the discussion of their merits.
When all the bullshit boils off, that's pretty much it: Manuals are more fun. That's why many of the people that absolutely love driving also love driving manuals. That's why my last three vehicles, and the next two I'm about to buy, are all manuals. You can point at spec sheets and trap times all day, but at the end of that day being in, or on, a vehicle that requires the active involvement of all four of my limbs and the finesse of years learning how to hit perfectly timed shifts and rev-matched downshifts while trail-braking into a corner and all the other things will absolutely always be more fun than riding around in this glorified high performance tablet on wheels. That may change when I finally build one of the EV projects I have in mind, but the products big manufacturers are putting out don't have a chance in hell. They may be fast, but they are muted, numb, tamed, and boring. They are perfect for the crowd that doesn't actually enjoy driving, and just want something that can get their blood pumping occasionally by putting their foot a little further into the floor to distract themselves from just how little they actually enjoy getting into their vehicle.And outside of this recreational feel of "engagement", what are the merits of a manual transmission?
Simplicity and reliability are 2 factors, descent control is easy.And outside of this recreational feel of "engagement", what are the merits of a manual transmission?
For an EV though, it's the opposite. It's simplest and most reliable to have a fixed gear transmission.Simplicity and reliability are 2 factors, descent control is easy.
I think it's pretty clear that simplicity and reliability only apply if there's an ICE in front of the transmission/clutch.For an EV though, it's the opposite. It's simplest and most reliable to have a fixed gear transmission.
This is a bit like making fun of someone because of their music taste.Because they are two different things. The first is people being assholes. The second is the audio equivalent of chrome-plated plastic. Fake AF, and it's obviously fake AF.
FauxthenticityCan the fake gear shifting and extra sounds be turned off in sport mode?
You know, for those of us not looking for fake authenticity.
I dislike boring driving experiences. Granted, I'm not in AMG territory, but the Hyundai N sounds like fun. I like the experience of driving, it's not just getting from point A to point B.Car features Americans need:
- Affordable
- Reliable
- "
Fun" driving experienceThroaty engine soundsFake gearshifts1200hp
I can absolutely have a legitimate argument. For the same reason I can hate vehicles that come with 18+in wheels, advanced cruise control that cannot be permanently overridden, and driver aids that cannot be permanently turned off installed as standard features. In this case you could probably turn it off, granted, but it's still more added points of failure, cost, complexity and, possibly, weight. All for a feature that is just a stupid gimmick that does nothing to improve the driving experience for anyone that actually enjoys driving.This is a bit like making fun of someone because of their music taste.
You might have a legitimate argument if there were grounds for a noise complaint, but it's hard to see how that could arise given that the fake sounds are all happening within the privacy of the driver's car.
I never said a fake manual was for me. The question was why drive a manual on the track and that is what I answered. I never said anything about EV or ICE, new or old tech for that matter other than not shifting is faster.Like I said in my original post, I have no issues with the concept, especially if it brings more people across to EVs. And I definitely understand the "I want to be better against myself" discussion, but it's not really relevant here. You're still not comparing your times against someone else, you're just artificially limiting what you can achieve with the hardware you have.
Not a valid comparison. That's like saying "why have a recreational vehicle when you can catch a Greyhound". Again, I understand the desire for recreational vehicles. But people who want to fly old-school Fokker biplanes, or Spitfires, or any other classic, don't buy the latest and greatest and then and just turn the settings down. They might do that for training purposes, but if you want the authenticity of an old WWI fighter you go and take a ride in a WWI fighter.
Same goes here, if you want the authenticity of an old manual transmission...
What I want to know is why a fake manual transmission is more engaging for you. It's something that I don't understand, so I'm genuinely curious as to the motivation.
What are the merits of a Lotus Elise with manual steering over electric assist. It is simply a preference. Why do some people like Coke over Pepsi or RC Cola?And outside of this recreational feel of "engagement", what are the merits of a manual transmission?