Lenovo fails for not providing shoppers sufficient laptop repairability information.
See full article...
See full article...
If that's the case, I have a $400 Acer laptop from 2010 that still turns on and runs Lubuntu. It's slow as molasses and I wouldn't use it as a primary machine anymore, but it's still the same parts from 15 years ago, no replacements.Would have been nice to have included reliability data as well- the best laptop is the one that keeps working.
It's easy to know.We needed a study to know Apple is at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to repairability ease?
Lenovo does a great job with providing repair guides and parts for most if not all their models. However there's a big gap in repairability between Thinkpads and their lower end laptops. I'm left wondering if the Lenovo models chosen in this report are from their consumer lines or if they include Thinkpads. I would think the same goes for HP and Dell too.My experience with replacing my new Thinkpad's touchpad indicates otherwise. Lenovo provides detailed maintenance and repair manuals describing how to replace every field-replaceable component, and lots of videos demonstrating exactly how to do so. There's also a seriously comprehensive parts store with every component you might plausibly need available at reasonable prices. (And for some reason, everything receives free fast shipping and arrives in retail-quality packaging.) So yeah, no complaints from me. I wonder if this is specific to Thinkpads, though; maybe it's not representative of cheaper Lenovo laptops?
Agreed and maybe included data about warranty repairs tooWould have been nice to have included reliability data as well- the best laptop is the one that keeps working.
Agreed and maybe included data about warranty repairs too
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0ZoCYXmF0Q
. I mean I guess it's a good thing ASUS laptops are accessible because you have repair them all the time... (Writing from my $600 Mac Mini because my $2000 ASUS laptop is busted again...)
Let's face it. It's always going to be easier to repair a loud bulky hunk of plastic than it is a quiet svelte metal machine. There are going to be tradeoffs for the shit Apple manages to pull off with such small devices.
But,... but,... why would they do such a thing!?It's easy to know.
Apple computers are actually very easy to repair "with the right parts and tools".
That last part is very important. When I was a certified Apple Tech years ago, I found Apple laptops very easy to repair. It's parts availability and guides that makes Apple hardware difficult to repair. Plus, they glue the batteries to the chassis, so replacing a battery is replacing the keyboard, trackpad and the surrounding metal.
I always found it frustrating how simple and well thought out Apple laptops were for repairing... if they didn't make it impossible via software locks and not making parts and tools easily available...
ThinkPads are the business models, and in my experience are highly servicable. Lenovo has even done away with a lot of the glue seals and stuff and gone back to just screwed together frames while still keeping the device thin.Is Thinkpad being separated out from Lenovo generally? Or maybe it's just swamped by other Lenovo models? Because I believe Thinkpad laptops have a ton of assembly/dissassembly and replacement information on each model.
That makes me feel a lot better about spending $25k on new Thinkpad laptops for the whole company this morning.My experience with replacing my new Thinkpad's touchpad indicates otherwise. Lenovo provides detailed maintenance and repair manuals describing how to replace every field-replaceable component, and lots of videos demonstrating exactly how to do so. There's also a seriously comprehensive parts store with every component you might plausibly need available at reasonable prices. (And for some reason, everything receives free fast shipping and arrives in retail-quality packaging.) So yeah, no complaints from me. I wonder if this is specific to Thinkpads, though; maybe it's not representative of cheaper Lenovo laptops?
It's easy to know.
Apple computers are actually very easy to repair "with the right parts and tools".
That last part is very important. When I was a certified Apple Tech years ago, I found Apple laptops very easy to repair. It's parts availability and guides that makes Apple hardware difficult to repair. Plus, they glue the batteries to the chassis, so replacing a battery is replacing the keyboard, trackpad and the surrounding metal.
I always found it frustrating how simple and well thought out Apple laptops were for repairing... if they didn't make it impossible via software locks and not making parts and tools easily available...
I agree. I have a Framework 16, and it's great, but it seems like almost everyone who sees it is surprised that such a thing even exists, and has never even heard of Framework.While obviously having the major producers is important, it'd be really nice to have some smaller ones like System76 and especially Framework. Especially with Framework, probably 11/10 repairability score on everything. Make it very publicly obvious that you CAN make a quality laptop that is excessively repairable, even upgradable, and doesn't always need to end up as a lot of waste.
With Lenovo that's not even the biggest problem. The BIOS lock they put on the motherboard means that even the few things you can replace (WiFi cards, for example) aren't upgradable... or even replacable.You mean when everything is soldered or glued together it's difficult to repair?
Was going to make a similar comment, in my experience it's much easier to find service manuals and parts for Lenovo laptops than it is other brands, especially across the range from consumer to enterprise.I worked for IBM for a number of years, and still know some of the IBM techs that repair Lenovo laptops. Lenovo laptops are highly repairable as per the original IBM design principles; you just need to know what FRU/CRU to order for replacement. Lenovo also publishes the procedures on how to replace parts. If Lenovo failed this is would be because of the language issue, not actual repairability.
This article made me curious, so I fired up my 2009 MacBook for the first time in a year or two, and of course it still works, although the (removable) batteries are probably very iffy by now. Not sure what I will do with it, other than put it back on the shelf. My 2015 MacBook Pro is now my off the internet Windows machine, which allows me to avoid migrating to Windows 11, and being bombarded by ads for Microsoft services I neither want nor need, and it gets used quite regularly. If I want to risk a hernia, I could go into the basement and get my 2004 Mac Pro up here and running in 5 minutes. I still use its keyboard. So, any repairability comparison, which does not take reliability into consideration is a rather flawed metric.As an individual who has owned many Apple laptops going all the way back to the PowerBook Duo 230 and has opened and repaired every single one: Not only are the current MacBooks easier to repair for common wear items, but are far better put together and have fewer parts that can break. As physical objects they last longer than they used to, as long as one is still happy with the relative computing performance.
There were a number of bad years where Macbook batteries were glued directly onto the laptop frame and had to be removed with solvent. However, the 2010–17 Macbook Air's had batteries mounted to a handy plastic tray that was held in by 4 or 5 torx screws, and the current ones since 2019 have a similar tray mounted with stretch tape.
"When I was a certified Apple Tech years ago" which is why end users find it so difficult to repair because they are both legally and physically locked out from being able to replace parts. Both in not being able to legally get and use the parts themselves so they can do the repair. Even 3rd party dodgy parts to enable a device to remain functioning is better then being denied the parts, and then being forced to landfill the whole device. Having had Apple decide that 3 years is enough time to restrict even licensed apple certified repairers the legal allowance to fix the machines (as had happened to my device purchased in that window from a store before apple cleared the stock out to the landfill) I have very little faith that many apple certified repairers will risk their contract with apple to repair devices Apple deems not profitable anymore. Even worse that is still taking away from the end users, businesses & customers the ability to repair the devices themselves.It's easy to know.
Apple computers are actually very easy to repair "with the right parts and tools".
That last part is very important. When I was a certified Apple Tech years ago, I found Apple laptops very easy to repair. It's parts availability and guides that makes Apple hardware difficult to repair. Plus, they glue the batteries to the chassis, so replacing a battery is replacing the keyboard, trackpad and the surrounding metal.
I always found it frustrating how simple and well thought out Apple laptops were for repairing... if they didn't make it impossible via software locks and not making parts and tools easily available...
Many of ours from those years had batteries explode and when just powered would prevent any use of Apple apps & system until the OS was updated (of which Apple denied updates to machines even relatively newer machines a real catch 22) so Apple effectively bricked so much of the core programs in the computer that they became expensive bookends. Do yourself a favor and look beyond the initial startup. Even then many of ours would just fail to start as soon as they dialed home to Apple as the great OS lockdown Apple created many screen of death events rendering the devices useless for any Apple related OS use. Just switch to linux and be glad you brought your devices before Apple started dropping heavily in hardware quality and repairability.This article made me curious, so I fired up my 2009 MacBook for the first time in a year or two, and of course it still works, although the (removable) batteries are probably very iffy by now. Not sure what I will do with it, other than put it back on the shelf. My 2015 MacBook Pro is now my off the internet Windows machine, which allows me to avoid migrating to Windows 11, and being bombarded by ads for Microsoft services I neither want nor need, and it gets used quite regularly. If I want to risk a hernia, I could go into the basement and get my 2004 Mac Pro up here and running in 5 minutes. I still use its keyboard. So, any repairability comparison, which does not take reliability into consideration is a rather flawed metric.
I think there is a gulf between the Think-series which are very repairable with decent parts availability in my experience (couple of mobile workstations bought new and a few SFF desktops for shared workshop/lab beaters.Was going to make a similar comment, in my experience it's much easier to find service manuals and parts for Lenovo laptops than it is other brands, especially across the range from consumer to enterprise.
That said it is just anecdotal experience with maybe 4 Lenovo devices and a handful of ones from other manufacturers I struggled more with.
I think there are two sides to the difficult to repair Macbooks though.We needed a study to know Apple is at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to repairability ease?
That is just utter nonsense. Have you ever tried Windows 11?Apple is even more toxic then windows for advertsing and setting up a walled garden.