LG TVs’ unremovable Copilot shortcut is the least of smart TVs’ AI problems

How long do you reckon it’s going to be before TV’s start randomly popping up text in the middle of of watching saying “This TV isn’t connected to the Internet, please connect it to install important updates.”
considering how many android tv's are basically linux malware ddos boxes now i expect every smart tv to not let you use the tuner until it is online to get a os update and will lock it self if it can't update. android, steam os, chrome os, and other embedded linux devices removed the security the os had from being barly used it also helprs that macos is running BSD and the virus code can be easy to port modern mac malware to linux. this is the year of the linux botnet.
 
Upvote
-19 (0 / -19)

balthazarr

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,994
Subscriptor++
It doesn't change the fact that nothing that LG does in an effort to monetize me beyond having purchased the TV years ago will work. They have not made a penny from me since then, and that is a 100% verifiable fact. I don't use webOS for anything beyond launching a few curated apps. I don't pay attention to anything else that shows up on the webOS screen. I won't be clicking on any CoPilot button, let alone even notice that it is there. So if LG's business model is to try to recoup the cost of the hardware through crap like AI, they will fail on this customer. Completely. 100% fail.
LOL. The mere fact that you "launch... a few curated apps" and view those icons that you don't pay attention to means LG gets something, so, no, not 100% fail.

They also run ACR and track everything that's displayed on the screen - whether via an app, usb input or HDMI input... so they make money from you via that avenue too.

Bottom line - if the TV is connected to the Internet, and you've agreed to the legalese, they're tracking you and making money off you.
 
Upvote
18 (20 / -2)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
They're only open if you connect them to the internet. The best thing you can do with any so-called "smart" TV is to leave it disconnected.
When I tried to set up an older (LG? Samsung?) smart tv with an IP address, but no gateway address, rendering it only able to communicate with my local network but not beyond, it considered the configuration invalid. Wonder if that's the case today?

Despite the no network configuration, a neighbor managed a screen share attempt with my set indicating that it's still listening somehow, despite being "disconnected".
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
The typical consumer almost certainly doesn't understand any of the problems that come with Smart TVs. Go ahead and walk around Best Buy or Walmart and ask people shopping TVs if they know what ACR is and let us know the numbers. Believe it or not, a lot of people simply have not the time or energy to invest in keeping up with all this underhanded bullshit and simply buy what's in their budget that suits their current needs. Want to blame someone? Blame LG, Microsoft, hell blame your legislators for not doing enough to hold them accountable.
Yet somehow Youtube can't use something like ACR to stop the same fraudulent "health" ads from being sponsored by a constantly shifting array of bogus companies, often from Brazil for some reason.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

JoHBE

Ars Praefectus
4,437
Subscriptor++
"Users can also ask the TV to make AI-generated wallpapers or provide real-time subtitle translations."

Talking about two extremes of actual usefulness... Now, the really interesting question here is of course how well the realtime translation actually works. Was it implemented in a very basic way to check a checkbox on a feature list, or have they put actual effort and extensive testing into it, to make it deliver what it suggests? I wish that was what would get all the attention.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Steven N

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,078
People don't want to pay what the device would cost without the subsidies. Look at TVs sold as commercial signs for a taste.
Bollocks.
My parents used to sell televisions way back in the 90-ties. On average, a color television would cost €800 (recalculated to euro’s) back then, which was around a full monthly paycheck.
And yet they still managed to sell enough of them to make a living.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

Idiotzoo

Smack-Fu Master, in training
80
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)
Copilot is metastasizing. It never was benign in the first place.

I have been saying it here for months, Copilot is a scam. It's not a real product. It's a sales funnel disguised as a product.

The first clue is that nobody actually uses Copilot yet MS continues to shove it in every corner of their consumer product line with no true option or way to opt out. This is because they don't actually care if you want it or not because its not for you, it's for them. This is how you know its not a real product and is in fact a scam.
 
Upvote
13 (14 / -1)

vvax56nM

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
166
You lost me at Alexa. Sure, it's a couple generations older than Copilot or whatever, but it's still a thing that spies on you and sends your voice and your data to Big Tech data centers where you have no control over what happens to it. No thank you.

Disclaimer: I worked on Alexa, briefly, in 2017.
While I share your sentiment I feel there is a big difference between a device you buy with the express purpose of having an AI assistant and a device you buy for some other purpose that has been bundled with one. Furthermore. if you like AI assistants you probably want only one of them to manage all your devices rather than each device having a different AI assistant.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
While I share your sentiment I feel there is a big difference between a device you buy with the express purpose of having an AI assistant and a device you buy for some other purpose that has been bundled with one. Furthermore. if you like AI assistants you probably want only one of them to manage all your devices rather than each device having a different AI assistant.

"there is a big difference between a device you buy with the express purpose of having an AI assistant and a device you buy for some other purpose that has been bundled with one"

This is the key distinction in this entire conversation. It is the lack of choice that makes it dystopian. If there was a way to opt out it wouldn't really be a problem. But having something you might consider a bad thing forced upon you without your consent and no real way to say no or opt out is supremely dystopian.

Then to make it doubly evil a company like MS will say oh sure you can say "no" and you can click the opt out button but we are still going to keep doing it anyway.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

mcswell

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,021
"The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment." --1984
 
Upvote
31 (31 / 0)
They're only open if you connect them to the internet. The best thing you can do with any so-called "smart" TV is to leave it disconnected.

Emerson still makes a 50" dumb TV. It says out of stuck but it also says arriving soon. I imagine it's popular in this day in age.
Even a smart TV + an Apple TV device will do.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
Bill Hicks has the right idea decades ago -
“If anyone here is in advertising or marketing, kill yourself. Just a little thought, I’m just trying to plant seeds… Kill yourself… There’s no rationalization for what you do, and you are Satan’s little helpers, okay? Kill yourselves. Seriously… There’s no fucking joke coming… You are Satan’s spawn filling the world with vile and garbage, you are fucked… Kill yourself. It’s the only way to save your fucking soul. Kill yourself. Planting seeds… I know all the marketing people are going ‘he’s just doing a joke’; there’s no joke here whatsoever. Suck a tailpipe, fucking hang yourself…. I don’t care how you do it.”
 
Upvote
9 (12 / -3)
Sorry, but that's not how the economics of TV manufacturing works.

The profit from third party income, from data brokers, from streaming services for placement, and for other applications (such as Copilot), absolutely dwarfs the potential profit from the hardware, and allows the TV manufacturers to sell the TVs below cost.

Note: I worked for a TV manufacturer for a while, so that's solid information.
How did they make a profit before the advent of annoying stuff like this?
 
Upvote
20 (20 / 0)
Nah, I'm good.

The only time my C4 got connected to the net was to update it to the most recent firmware. After that, I disconnected it and moved over to using an Apple TV. I have zero trust in any of these other companies' software. Most of it is a trojan horse for advertising and data collection, none of which I want anything to do with.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

bdrram03

Ars Centurion
306
Subscriptor++
Technically, yes, but remember that this is all about scrounging extra profit. TVs are very price competitive and they’re not putting a 5G modem in, getting it certified, etc. if they don’t have to because that adds extra parts to each unit which would mostly be unnecessary. Getting in bed with Comcast, et al. uses the Wi-Fi hardware they were already shipping and I’d bet that they can find a revenue sharing agreement since all of the parties involved want to know what you’re watching and could not care less about your privacy.
That would be interesting for sure, I used to work for a telco and people used to pop open smart meters and steal sim cards from them all the time.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

otterbox

Smack-Fu Master, in training
97
Subscriptor
that’s why I’m using Apple TV with my LG TV…
I have a similar setup. An older LG TV bought for the display quality only. It is five-seven years old. An amplifier is the only thing plugged directly into that. Then a sat receiver, Apple TV and a BluRay player plugged into the amp, all HDMI. So no direct communication from the TV to the world. Or the amp which is 10+ years old.

Are TV manufacturers doing something horrible now. Like requiring an internet configuration to setup, register and configure?

Then why not buy a monitor? High quality display, no BS. Only HDMI plugged into it.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)
People do like the subsidies but part of that is also the lack of alternatives or disclosure. If you had two units side by side on the shelf and one had a sticker disclosing that it cost $50 less because it logged everything you watch and had a 5 year support lifetime before the apps broke, people might have second thoughts.
Yeah I think dim-bulb libertarians forget—or never understood (edit: or understand and are lying)—that “free markets” REQUIRE transparency.

There IS NO FREE MARKET without it.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

vvax56nM

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
166
"The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment." --1984
Not being able to tell if you are being watched is Really Bad. So lets have AI watch you constantly. -- all TV device manufacturer CEOs
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

FSTargetDrone

Ars Scholae Palatinae
848
Other than OTA tuner software on one of my Vizio TVs that became dogshit slow after a firmware update (which prompted me to just buy and use a cheap Mediasonic Homeworx tuner box) and the Apple TV app on another TV, I’ve never used any other built-in smart TV app more than once. If nothing else, they are always horrendously slow to the point that it swiftly becomes an exercise in frustration to use them.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)