Contact your representative and senators and let them know that if they vote for any position other than defunding/abolishing ICE, you will vote against them in the next primary and encourage everyone in your community to do the same.

Won’t matter.

You know when I said Nuremberg trials.

Chuck Schumer needs to have his turn in the dock. His name should go down in history with Quisling and Ephialtes.
 

Pont

Ars Legatus Legionis
26,147
Subscriptor
NYT just did a focus group with Trump voters this week and almost all of them are still supportive of the basic idea of getting rid of all immigrants who entered illegally. But some of them don’t like the current ICE tactics. And my point is that it’s essentially impossible. You cannot logistically build an organization capable of humanely deporting millions of people over a short time. It’s unpossible.

"Entered illegally" is severely under-selling it at this point. They want to deport all immigrants who at any point in time have ever been in an invalid immigrant state. It's an excuse to be anti-immigrant and make legal immigrants scared and compliant.

* come in the country for asylum? You came in illegally (by necessity)! Gone!

* overstay a tourist visa? You're illegal! Deported!

* fail to find a new job to sponsor your H1B in the 30 days but currently have someone trying to sponsor you? Deported!

* share a name with someone who committed a crime? Who cares if there are millions of Maria Garcias out there. Detained! And since we have you detained, might as well deport you.

* misspell the name of a street on one of the addresses on your paperwork? Greencard revoked! Deported!
 

Louis XVI

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,296
Subscriptor

concernUrsus

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
862
Or who was ever been an immigrant, or whoever was ever the child of an immigrant, or... Honestly, I'm not sure it ever ends.

I have family and friends who told me that they are worry. Most of them are Asia origin and all are legal immigrants, so not even the current top targets. I am worried... but I think my worry is more financial. Fairly sure if they decide to kick me out, I won't able to take my money with me.
 
Last edited:

GohanIYIan

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,877
Do you have an actual source for that and not some Twitter screen cap for ants?
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...s-following-minneapolis-shooting-pro-00729265

It's sort of a metaphysical argument. If you require ICE to wear body cams, they need to obtain body cams which cost money. If you give DHS a new appropriation designated for purchasing body cams you are in some sense increasing funding for DHS but not really increasing funding for lawless removal operations. If you insist DHS has to pay for the body cams with its existing appropriation you are in some sense cutting something else that appropriation was meant for which may or may not end up being lawless removal operations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xenocrates

Scifigod

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,678
Subscriptor++
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...s-following-minneapolis-shooting-pro-00729265

It's sort of a metaphysical argument. If you require ICE to wear body cams, they need to obtain body cams which cost money. If you give DHS a new appropriation designated for purchasing body cams you are in some sense increasing funding for DHS but not really increasing funding for lawless removal operations. If you insist DHS has to pay for the body cams with its existing appropriation you are in some sense cutting something else that appropriation was meant for which may or may not end up being lawless removal operations.
I get your argument, I'm more in the "I could mock up all kinds of bullshit in a fake Twitter screenshot too, let's see some actual links" camp.
 
It's that wormtoungue of a man Stephen Miller, who doesn't understand or believe in America, and his favorite book "Camp of the Saints", a racist diatribe about the supposed end of Western civilization caused by immigration from Southeast Asia. To him America isn't a melting pot, but instead it's about blood and soil, which is strange given he's also the descendant of somewhat recent immigrants and, for thousands of years, that soil was the holy land of the native Americans, a people who Steven Miller has no respect for whatsoever.
It isn’t weird at all. You’ve just misrepresented his actual ideology. His ideology is “might makes right”. It’s that you can and should do whatever you want that you think you can get away with. That’s it.

It’s just Donald Trump’s “oh yeah, make me” turned into an overt ambition rather than an incidental defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sajuuk

concernUrsus

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
862
It isn’t weird at all. You’ve just misrepresented his actual ideology. His ideology is “might makes right”. It’s that you can and should do whatever you want that you think you can get away with. That’s it.

It’s just Donald Trump’s “oh yeah, make me” turned into an overt ambition rather than an incidental defense.

A lot of the bullies forget that they may be a bit bigger and people may back down initially, but they are not big enough to take on everyone.
 
A lot of the bullies forget that they may be a bit bigger and people may back down initially, but they are not big enough to take on everyone.
I guess. Hasn’t stopped Trump or Miller so far, just occasionally temporarily diverted their attention and/or approach. 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sajuuk

BuckWyld

Ars Praefectus
3,180
Subscriptor
It isn’t weird at all. You’ve just misrepresented his actual ideology. His ideology is “might makes right”. It’s that you can and should do whatever you want that you think you can get away with. That’s it.

It’s just Donald Trump’s “oh yeah, make me” turned into an overt ambition rather than an incidental defense.

The ironic thing is if it were not for laws and social norms Miller would probably have the shit beat out of him every day for his whole life.
 

Lt_Storm

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
20,019
Subscriptor++
It isn’t weird at all. You’ve just misrepresented his actual ideology. His ideology is “might makes right”. It’s that you can and should do whatever you want that you think you can get away with. That’s it.

It’s just Donald Trump’s “oh yeah, make me” turned into an overt ambition rather than an incidental defense.
While I'm sure his philosophy does believe that might make right, that isn't what motivates him, that is the racial animus. Which tells you that might makes right isn't really his ideology. His might makes right ideas are backed by a titanic share of the ends justify the means, and, in his mind, those ends the ends are nothing less that the salvation of western society from the genetic degradation of all those immigrants. To him, they must be driven form our midst lest they infect us with... Well who knows precisely. The man is a fascist, he holds fascist ideology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdrianS

Gisboth

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,373
Invasion, rebellion and inability to execute Federal law with civilian forces are other legal reasons for activation [of the Natl. Guard].
fwiw, that was the Trump administration argument on the meaning of "regular forces" in the law.

Last month the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, disagreed with that interpretation.

Trump v. Illinois: A Narrow Supreme Court Decision with Broad Implications
The six justices in the majority agreed with the district court and Prof. Lederman that the term “regular forces” means the active-duty armed forces. There is, indeed, overwhelming support for this interpretation in the legislative history and contemporaneous historical documents.
emph. added
 
  • Like
Reactions: m0nckywrench

Zod

Ars Praefectus
4,724
Subscriptor++
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...s-following-minneapolis-shooting-pro-00729265

It's sort of a metaphysical argument. If you require ICE to wear body cams, they need to obtain body cams which cost money. If you give DHS a new appropriation designated for purchasing body cams you are in some sense increasing funding for DHS but not really increasing funding for lawless removal operations. If you insist DHS has to pay for the body cams with its existing appropriation you are in some sense cutting something else that appropriation was meant for which may or may not end up being lawless removal operations.
Have you seen their budget?
 

Ajar

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,571
Subscriptor++
An interesting article outlining how Minnesota's ICE Watch deescalates situations and some of the positive effects this is having:

https://www.ms.now/opinion/minneapolis-ice-watch-protesters-violence-research

One notable one is that ICE patrol sizes are larger now, meaning it takes more agents to do each thing they try to do. They have also pulled agents from other cities to go to MN. So ICE accomplishes less than before.

And Trump is suddenly not falling over himself to invoke the Insurrection Act. That could change tomorrow, but so far, at least some of the grassroots pushback against the regime is having some effect. I hope they can sustain and grow it.
 

Karnak

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,959
Subscriptor
"Entered illegally" is severely under-selling it at this point. They want to deport all immigrants who at any point in time have ever been in an invalid immigrant state. It's an excuse to be anti-immigrant and make legal immigrants scared and compliant.

* come in the country for asylum? You came in illegally (by necessity)! Gone!

* overstay a tourist visa? You're illegal! Deported!

* fail to find a new job to sponsor your H1B in the 30 days but currently have someone trying to sponsor you? Deported!

* share a name with someone who committed a crime? Who cares if there are millions of Maria Garcias out there. Detained! And since we have you detained, might as well deport you.

* misspell the name of a street on one of the addresses on your paperwork? Greencard revoked! Deported!
One US Navy vet Trump voter's British born wife is being deported after having lived in the USA for 37 years with a greencard because she bounced a $25.00 check in 2015. She was convicted of a misdemeanor, paid the $25 back, paid the fine and assumed it was done and in the past. She got picked up coming back into the country after visiting relatives in the UK and is now being held for deportation. Faces, leopards and all that.
 

Shavano

Ars Legatus Legionis
68,383
Subscriptor
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...s-following-minneapolis-shooting-pro-00729265

It's sort of a metaphysical argument. If you require ICE to wear body cams, they need to obtain body cams which cost money. If you give DHS a new appropriation designated for purchasing body cams you are in some sense increasing funding for DHS but not really increasing funding for lawless removal operations. If you insist DHS has to pay for the body cams with its existing appropriation you are in some sense cutting something else that appropriation was meant for which may or may not end up being lawless removal operations.
There's a hell of a lot of ICE people who would be better replaced with body cams even if the body cams never got turned on.
 

wireframed

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,268
Subscriptor
Don think this was posted yet. Saw it on Reddit:
https://apnews.com/article/ice-immigration-detention-death-texas-2bfb614b2b222803d309f338357d04eb

ICE claims suicide, witnesses say it was straight up murder. That he was strangulated.

I don’t want to be alarmist, but we are reaching an inflection point, a point of no return where things get really, really bad, very very fast. It feels like one of those time times the world suddenly changes in weeks or months.

Were three days short of the first year of Trumps term, and we went from “It’s not ideal but let’s not overreact”, to “Masked federal agents might kill you on a whim, and it isn’t actually illegal”.

I’m afraid unless the American public awakens and stoke the fires of resistance, we are months, maybe a year, from a de-facto authoritarian regime little different from Russia.

Absurd? Impossible? A year ago, immigration officers outright murdering not one, but TWO civilians, and an executive that affirms it not only isn’t illegal but that the entire organisation is basically above the law.

Edit: Sorry, it isn’t actually new, it happened earlier in the month. My bad, bungled the dates. The rest stands, though.
 

concernUrsus

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
862
Don think this was posted yet. Saw it on Reddit:
https://apnews.com/article/ice-immigration-detention-death-texas-2bfb614b2b222803d309f338357d04eb

ICE claims suicide, witnesses say it was straight up murder. That he was strangulated.

I don’t want to be alarmist, but we are reaching an inflection point, a point of no return where things get really, really bad, very very fast. It feels like one of those time times the world suddenly changes in weeks or months.

Were three days short of the first year of Trumps term, and we went from “It’s not ideal but let’s not overreact”, to “Masked federal agents might kill you on a whim, and it isn’t actually illegal”.

I’m afraid unless the American public awakens and stoke the fires of resistance, we are months, maybe a year, from a de-facto authoritarian regime little different from Russia.

Absurd? Impossible? A year ago, immigration officers outright murdering not one, but TWO civilians, and an executive that affirms it not only isn’t illegal but that the entire organisation is basically above the law.

Edit: Sorry, it isn’t actually new, it happened earlier in the month. My bad, bungled the dates. The rest stands, though.

Honestly, with the amount of killing/incidents, you would have to link to the article. I am not sure which TWO civilians killed you were talking about.
 
Last edited:

Scifigod

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,678
Subscriptor++
While I'm somewhat skeptical of the courts abilities to save us from all this is good to see that there is still some legal pushback. The judge has re-affirmed that no you can not stop cats just because they might be following you or pepper spray peaceful protests who are not inhibiting your actions.

Buried in the article is this nasty piece of info though:
Federal prosecutors sent grand jury subpoenas to Walz and Frey on Friday seeking information about alleged obstruction, according to a person briefed on the inquiry who was granted anonymity due to the ongoing nature of the investigation. The probe is exploring potential violations of a federal law, 18 U.S.C. 372, that outlaws conspiracies to impede or injure federal officers, the person said.
Now who's the one performing "lawfare" again?

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/16/ice-minneapolis-arrests-judge-protests-00735416
 

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
75,415
Subscriptor
Now who's the one performing "lawfare" again?
It was always cynical, deliberate projection: accuse your opponent of that which you are guilty of. Just like charges of corruption and attempts to steal elections, just like the howlers about protecting college students from antisemitism while banning Plato because it's too woke. Trump has always used the law to hurt people he didn't like.
 

Coriolanus

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,244
Subscriptor++
While I'm somewhat skeptical of the courts abilities to save us from all this is good to see that there is still some legal pushback. The judge has re-affirmed that no you can not stop cats just because they might be following you or pepper spray peaceful protests who are not inhibiting your actions.

Buried in the article is this nasty piece of info though:

Now who's the one performing "lawfare" again?

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/16/ice-minneapolis-arrests-judge-protests-00735416
Trump's current DOJ can't indict a ham sandwich.
 

Megalodon

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,639
Subscriptor
While I'm somewhat skeptical of the courts abilities to save us from all this is good to see that there is still some legal pushback. The judge has re-affirmed that no you can not stop cats just because they might be following you or pepper spray peaceful protests who are not inhibiting your actions.

They won't stop, but it will help turn people that aren't ultra-online against them.
 

Bardon

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,096
Subscriptor++
This. There’s this idea out there that MAGA is a monolith defined by their cruelest, most reprehensible member and that’s obviously not true. There absolutely are MAGA voters who look at what’s going on and say “this isn’t what I signed up for”. I wish there were more, and my stomach churns at the thought that there are as many out there as there are who celebrate this behavior. But it’s not a monolith.
"This isn't what I signed up for". That an $6 gets you a cup of coffee.

It's performative at best unless they change who they vote for and what are the chances of that?
 

Technarch

Ars Legatus Legionis
14,932
Subscriptor
Trump's current DOJ can't indict a ham sandwich.

I thought it was a hoagie.

Even so, this kind of harassment is still effective. The target has to retain counsel and fight the charges, which all takes time, money, and energy. Trump can do it with impunity because he'll never, ever be held accountable for frivolous lawsuits.
 

BrangdonJ

Ars Praefectus
4,612
Subscriptor
One US Navy vet Trump voter's British born wife is being deported after having lived in the USA for 37 years with a greencard because she bounced a $25.00 check in 2015. She was convicted of a misdemeanor, paid the $25 back, paid the fine and assumed it was done and in the past. She got picked up coming back into the country after visiting relatives in the UK and is now being held for deportation. Faces, leopards and all that.
If that's Donna Hughes-Brown, she's won her case and isn't being deported. If it's not, please give a name or link so I can follow it up. I'm interested because I have a niece in America who is worried.
 

Justin Credible

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,038
Subscriptor++

Coriolanus

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,244
Subscriptor++
I thought it was a hoagie.

Even so, this kind of harassment is still effective. The target has to retain counsel and fight the charges, which all takes time, money, and energy. Trump can do it with impunity because he'll never, ever be held accountable for frivolous lawsuits.
It was a reference to the expression that a prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich (because the burden is so low). The Trump DOJ has faced the highest rates of no bills (failures to indict before a grand jury) perhaps ever.

I think the governor and mayor are sophisticated enough parties that they can dismantle any potential attempts.
 

Matisaro

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,203
Subscriptor

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1qfe9sy/about_freedom_in_america_right_now/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button



This video made me quite upset. I agree with him. Whatever rises from the ashes of what they are going to do to us all absolutely must begin with mass trials and the resultant punishment of the ones doing this.

Not just the leaders, a reckoning. We must absolutely not make the same mistake we did in reconstruction with basically the same people again.
 

poochyena

Ars Scholae Palatinae
4,917
Subscriptor++
Incredible headline
1768669453243.png

Its not specific to ICE, but related. Its an entertaining opinion piece https://www.al.com/news/2026/01/why-do-police-dress-like-characters-from-fortnite.html
 

Scifigod

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,678
Subscriptor++

Coppercloud

Ars Praefectus
4,635
Subscriptor
I hate to say it but this might be a litmus test for the current state of rule of law in the US. A judge has ordered ICE to stop pepper spraying, arresting, and pulling over peacefull protestors .
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/u...nst-peaceful-minnesota-protesters/ar-AA1UnSeR
I'm still confused as why protestors are being protected from illegal arrest but not random legal citizen sitting in their home. But if the ruling is as it's being described we will see if ICE gives two fucks about a court order in short term, and if they don't will anyone actually even try to stop them.
 

Coppercloud

Ars Praefectus
4,635
Subscriptor
While I'm loath to bring TEH ECONOMY!!! into this it's worth at least noting that the surge is having a noticable detrimental effect on the Minnesota local economy.
Hope nobody in MN wants real Mexican food anytime soon. There's a lot of local Mexican places that are closed because workers are scared to go in.
 

QtDevSvr

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,196
Subscriptor++
I hate to say it but this might be a litmus test for the current state of rule of law in the US. A judge has ordered ICE to stop pepper spraying, arresting, and pulling over peacefull protestors .
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/u...nst-peaceful-minnesota-protesters/ar-AA1UnSeR
I'm still confused as why protestors are being protected from illegal arrest but not random legal citizen sitting in their home. But if the ruling is as it's being described we will see if ICE gives two fucks about a court order in short term, and if they don't will anyone actually even try to stop them.
Trump can "comply" with escalation: invoking the Insurrection Act.
 

Scifigod

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,678
Subscriptor++
Hope nobody in MN wants real Mexican food anytime soon. There's a lot of local Mexican places that are closed because workers are scared to go in.
💯 I'm in the far suburbs and I've even gotten a few closure notices from restaurants I occasionally haunt. That second link was trying to keep a running list going but I'm certain it's scratching the surface.