Hurricane Milton becomes second-fastest storm to reach Category 5 status

@lurknomore, you might point out this bit to them:

My understanding is that the storm surge is historically responsible for the majority of deaths, and certainly for Tampa will cause a huge amount flooding and property damage given the low elevation.
Storm surge is a direct result of low pressure moving across open water which tends to make the water rise. Wind has little to do with the height of storm surge and more to do with the geography of the land and where and how it meets the water, Add in the tides and it's all physics. The storm surge is now forecasted to be 10 to 20 feet above sea level. Anyone who doesn't realize this is a catastrophe aiming right for them better put their affairs in order.
 
Upvote
7 (8 / -1)
And according to liberals, these people deserve this and lets make jokes about it since it's hilarious that people are more then likely going to die.

Frankly, you have to be one sick fuck to believe either extreme.
You speak as if 'liberals' as a group feel that way which is nonsense. Some sick fucks feel that way and it doesn't come from any kind of politics. It comes from a sick mind.
Conservatives whining about every little 'hurtful words' is tiresome. . Grow the fuck up.
 
Upvote
36 (36 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,067
Subscriptor
You speak as if 'liberals' as a group feel that way which is nonsense. Some sick fucks feel that way and it doesn't come from any kind of politics. It comes from a sick mind.
Conservatives whining about every little 'hurtful words' is tiresome. . Grow the fuck up.
And if anyone's feeling sensitive about a particular ideological group being judgmental assholes about climate disaster, I encourage them to maybe take a critical look at their own record, and whether they've indulged in any snotty comments about "forest management" or the like when others have suffered. Grudges like that are rarely ex nilhio.
 
Upvote
20 (20 / 0)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
76,181
Subscriptor
Seeing the pics and videos of the traffic jams on BBC, I don't get why they haven't opened some of the inbound lanes for the outbound evacuation traffic. I thought many US states had such evac plans already in place and well rehearsed?
From Florida resident posting in The Lounge:
That tweet was made a few hours after Pinellas county (connected to Tampa via that bridge) issued an evacuation notice for three zones. Traffic was backed up all day yesterday, but it's smooth now. No need yet to open opposing lanes.

Also, the incoming lanes are bringing people and supplies. They need to stage electrical trucks, fire trucks, ambulances, portable bathrooms and showers, large generators, etc. in side the hurricane's path, and they're keeping incoming lanes open for that.

No worries. That tweet would make me snarky too if I wasn't living in the area.

Overall, Tampa Bay is doing a really good job with this hurricane. They called for evacuations several days ahead of the storm. They're gathering up as much debris as they can. The mayors are working well with the state. It's about as good as you could expect.

As much as I despise Ron DeSantis, he's also doing a good job to prepare for this hurricane. He's in touch with the mayors and sending resources that we need. There was a dust-up about his communication with Washington, but the state and federal offices are talking and coordinating, regardless of whether governor and president are talking directly.

We're in...well, not in good shape, but the best shape you could hope for.
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)

OrvGull

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,945
Inland beyond any storm surge it's practical to build storm-proof homes elevated above flood levels but that kind of archtecture is currently unpopular. A reinforced concrete building can mimic adobe etc without resorting to unconventional-looking domes which are an acquired taste. Lower square footage for a given price is an issue but many US homes could stand to be smaller.
That's true -- there are SoCal cities that are full of reinforced concrete fauxdobe buildings -- but as Surfside shows, reinforced concrete has serious issues in saltwater environments. Even salt spray in the air will eventually trigger irreparable spalling as the salt soaks into the concrete and rusts the rebar.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,067
Subscriptor
I agree, which is why i said as much in the post. Normal people don't take delight in other people's sufferings and yet you see a lot of that in this thread. It's sad how politics have warped people so badly
It is. After the past couple of years, it is sad and weird and infuriating, but in no way surprising, either. It's genuinely hard to feel concern, empathy, solidarity for folks who don't actually feel any for you. But if conservatives are bewildered about where that came from, they need to spend some time considering who they vote for, what kinds of policies they support, and what they've supported.
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)
You made me wonder about the pilots and other occupants of those planes flying commercial airlines during their vacation. The commercial pilot announces a little turbulence ... everyone else gets worried and the hurricane plane pilot just laughs.
Pilots at NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research) in Boulder, CO, used to (and may still) fly gliders into thunderstorms. One of their ships was a Schweizer 2-32 that was instrumented, and its pilots had some interesting stories. That ship came out of one storm looking like someone angry had gone over every square foot of every surface on the plane with a hammer. Hail scares even the big boys, or should.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,067
Subscriptor
I “believe” in climate change. It feels very weird typing that as it is scientific consensus, not a belief, but nonetheless I want to make that clear.

Recent events like this and Asheville have been, to vary degrees, associated with climate change. What I am struggling to understand is that Tampa has been hit by hurricanes before, while Asheville has been flooded before and both of those preceded the timeframes that are associated with climate change having a major effect.

If Asheville and Tampa were seeing more frequent hurricanes and floods, I could see the association. Likewise, if they were first time occurrences I could see the association.

When discussing this subject with friends or family that are climate change skeptics these are the logical points they make. They are engaging in a good faith debate, even if the science is clear to me, it isn’t to them. I don’t have a particularly good response refute them directly on these points.

Perhaps some in the commentariat can shed some light on this. Constructive responses would be much appreciated.
Climate change is a threat multiplier. It puts our thumb on the scales, it weights the dice, it fiddles with the slot machine. If flooding is rare, intensified storms and shifted precipitation regimes make it more likely. If flooding is severe, higher water vapor transport rates make it worse. If a drought is long, AGW makes it longer and hotter. If a hurricane is intense, a warmer sea surface intensifies it faster and to a greater magnitude. If a wildfire starts, higher vapor pressure deficit and lower fuel moisture makes it expand faster, burn hotter, damage the soil more. If it's already summer in the Middle East, higher wet bulb temperatures stress human health more and kill more of the young, old, and vulnerable. If an invasive species prefers cool, wet, late-winter conditions, it will germinate earlier than native species can, thereby gaining competitive advantage.

In all these cases, everything that did happen, could happen. You can always come up snake eyes when you throw a pair of dice. But when the dice are loaded, and you come up snake eyes six times out of ten, it's very silly assume the dice aren't loaded just because snake eyes are possible one in 36 rolls. And just because Asheville has flooded in the past doesn't mean these floods were of a normal and expected volume, intensity, and cause.

And that kind of reasoning is how carnies take their marks for everything they're carrying. The number of people who are otherwise smart and capable who resort to carny mark reasoning when they can't admit they were wrong is startling.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,067
Subscriptor
Pilots at NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research) in Boulder, CO, used to (and may still) fly gliders into thunderstorms. One of their ships was a Schweizer 2-32 that was instrumented, and its pilots had some interesting stories. That ship came out of one storm looking like someone angry had gone over every square foot of every surface on the plane with a hammer. Hail scares even the big boys, or should.
One hail storm earlier this year did over two billion dollars in damage to Denver. Didn't even make the news outside Colorado.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,067
Subscriptor
It is very hard to convince someone when agreeing is inconvenient for them. For many reasons. Let's not forget such simple thing as denial stage. And then add doing a bet for more egoistic, conservative political force. Having a community that requires to agree with them otherwise being rejected. And end up with directly benefiting from forces that are playing strong role of escalating situation.

They not gonna care when scientists told 5 months ago that this hurricane season will be worst. They not gonna care that scientists pointed out that downpour is encouraged by way atmosphere and ocean heats up.

I am actually surprised that people continue to wait on these people to understand anything. Just make climate change an emergency and make anyone trying to pretend it's not a fool. Yes, you will shed some foolish voters but you gonna lose them anyway.
As a scientist, which is to say someone who is very accustomed to finding out he's wrong or being told so and having to suck that up and accept new facts, it is fucking wild to me how many people will go to lengths like this simply to avoid having to admit they're wrong.
 
Upvote
19 (19 / 0)

numerobis

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
51,193
Subscriptor
Hears to hoping some of the forecasters on TV and the internet are correct in that intense wind shear in the atmosphere knocks it down a few notches as it approaches the Fla. coast. Its still gonna make a mess though. :/
The storm surge is a wave that gets pushed up for days, including right now with the storm at or near peak intensity. Weakening at the last minute still leaves it a very large wave.

And while the peak winds would fall, the area of high winds would increase, according to the current forecast. Less scouring of the earth in one spot, more places badly impacted. It’s not really a win either way (not that we get to choose).
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

raxx7

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,133
Subscriptor++
Plants, on average absorb 83% of the sunlight that falls on them. Of that 83% they use 4% and reject the rest as heat.

And not nearly all of that energy over the past umpteen million years was stored as fossil fuels, a.k.a. carbon capture. Most of the carbon a plant uses gets re-used by the next generation of plants when the plant dies, sheds its leaves, gets burned in a forest fire, etc. And some gets consumed and used by animals, who in turn get eaten, excrete it, or decompose when they die,

I have read over the past few years of labs that have created synthetic "coal" from biomass, generally by baking it at high temperature and high pressure with lots of hot water. Some have claimed that it is an economically viable and sustainable way to create an alternate fuel for power plants that use mined coal. You essentially use the synthetic coal to store energy produced by dams, wind turbines, or solar panels then burn it when the river is frozen, the sun isn't shining, or the wind isn't blowing. I see no reason you couldn't just bury the synthetic coal instead.

To me it seems the expensive and possibly never viable carbon capture methods are the ones that try to harvest the carbon directly from the atmosphere.

We can't grow biomass fast enough.

If biomass grew fast enough we'd first convert biomass into carbon neutral biofuels for our needs and we'd bury the excess biomass for carbon sequestration.
And all would be peachy.

But as it stands we can only cover a bit of our needs with biomass.
So we'll probably usawhatever sustainable biomass we can grow to produce carbon neutral biofuels and prioritize using those biofuels for applications like aviation and energy storage.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

numerobis

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
51,193
Subscriptor
Indeed! Hope those $750 short-term payments for immediate necessities come in handy, while vastly larger payouts for specific assistance are still in the works.
Congress would have to meet to fund that larger assistance package. Johnson is refusing to do that before the election. So, $750 has to keep people going for at least another month. The GOP clearly is hoping that by not funding disaster relief in North Carolina and now Florida, voters will blame the current president’s party.
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Storm surge is a direct result of low pressure moving across open water which tends to make the water rise. Wind has little to do with the height of storm surge and more to do with the geography of the land and where and how it meets the water, Add in the tides and it's all physics. The storm surge is now forecasted to be 10 to 20 feet above sea level. Anyone who doesn't realize this is a catastrophe aiming right for them better put their affairs in order.

Strom surge is mostly wind driven. From NOAA:

What Causes Storm Surge?​

Storm surge is primarily caused by the strong onshore winds of a hurricane or tropical storm. The wind circulation around the eye of a hurricane causes a vertical circulation in the ocean. While in deep water, there is no indication of storm surge because there is nothing to interfere with this circulation. However, once the storm reaches the shallower waters near the coast, the vertical circulation is disrupted by the ocean bottom. The water can no longer move downward, so it begins to move upward and inland, resulting in storm surge.

You don't want to be on the right hand side (relative to forward motion) of hurricanes. That is where the storm surge is going to happen at landfall and in general, for various reasons, the right front quadrant is has the strongest winds, too.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

Oldmanalex

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,980
Subscriptor++
As a scientist, which is to say someone who is very accustomed to finding out he's wrong or being told so and having to suck that up and accept new facts, it is fucking wild to me how many people will go to lengths like this simply to avoid having to admit they're wrong.
Nothing like going toe to toe with actual reality to find out that, just because your idea is logical and gets you where you want to go, does not mean that it is correct. Then the intelligent change their hypothesis, and the fools go on ignoring the data.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)
Sigh.

I shouldn't have to explain I'm doing a little satire on the OP about how absurd it is to label everyone in a group as the same.


I agree, which is why i said as much in the post. Normal people don't take delight in other people's sufferings and yet you see a lot of that in this thread. It's sad how politics have warped people so badly


Are you not doing the same exact thing right now?
If that was satire, you do it poorly.
No, my comment was not whining since my point had an actual premise that focused on a particular set of words. Much like Haitians eating pets, The Right make up shit out of complete bullshit to demonize a group as group behavior. And then whine like little girls when their bullshit is called out and bleating "Why are you so hurtful?" Confronting bigotry is not whining. It's combating potentially dangerous behavior. And I will confront it til my dying breath. Which is not too far off.
 
Upvote
19 (19 / 0)

42Kodiak42

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,508
As a scientist, which is to say someone who is very accustomed to finding out he's wrong or being told so and having to suck that up and accept new facts, it is fucking wild to me how many people will go to lengths like this simply to avoid having to admit they're wrong.
If you're not wrong about half of the time, are you even doing science?
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)
As a scientist, which is to say someone who is very accustomed to finding out he's wrong or being told so and having to suck that up and accept new facts, it is fucking wild to me how many people will go to lengths like this simply to avoid having to admit they're wrong.
Sadly, even many scientists and other well-educated people are not at all exempt from this when it comes to their political and economic beliefs.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Niles Gazic

Ars Praetorian
413
Subscriptor++
Somewhere I think Ryan Hall had images of surface and coral temperatures in the Gulf and its like, 70-89 F ranges. Its absurdly warm. The Gulf is now a closed-loop boiler for tropical systems of any size.

I knew Milton would develop into something but this badly, this quickly? That's a hell of a growth spurt. If you're in Tampa or Central Florida, get the hell out now.

* If you are a MAGA true believer, you should stay put, your Guns N' Bibles will save you.
 
Upvote
3 (5 / -2)

cgo_12345

Ars Scholae Palatinae
974
And according to liberals, these people deserve this and lets make jokes about it since it's hilarious that people are more then likely going to die.

Frankly, you have to be one sick fuck to believe either extreme.
Your persecution complex is irrelevant. Pack away your strawman and calm down.
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)

EnPeaSea

Ars Scholae Palatinae
5,329
Same. I really just want to be left alone. To the extent I have "opponents" it's because one party really, really wants to mess with my life.
For sure; you and I sometimes bump heads (or just energetically talk past each other), but you are not an "opponent" to me. However, there is a certain movement that is further right than they ought to be for what they call themselves, led by someone who hasn't recieved popular vote, and would happily consider me sub-human for any combination of diagnoses and lifestyle.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)
A couple of comments on some posts in this thread that I think are a little off the mark...

Hillsborough (like all of the other big coastal counties in Florida - Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, etc., even Duval) are Blue. Some quite Blue. So a lot of the political discussion above isn't really applicable, to the extent it ever is about an entire population, to the Tamp Bay area. The counties to the North and South are Red but also less populous. And in recent times the state has been close to 50/50 (it went for Obama both times). It used to be Blue.

With respect to emergency management, in my experience Florida and the localities do a good job. There is extensive planning and those plans are generally executed pretty well. The problems tend to come more from the very high number of residents with little to no hurricane experience (and worse, thinking they have it when they don't) either under estimating the danger or panicking. The state emphasizes preparation year-round but most people just don't do it. Going to like a grocery store before a storm is hell and generally unnecessary if you planned properly. There's not much government can do about these things.

As to evacuations. I would never judge anyone's decision on whether and how to evacuate. It's a really difficult decision and if you've never had to do it you may not really be able to appreciate just how difficult it is. But you don't need to "evacuate, evacuate" and the state and counties generally discourage it. The state has extensive evacuation zones and maps and local media will talk about endlessly them and who needs to evacuate as the storm approaches. If you don't need to evacuate you are usually better off not evacuating. And if you do need to evacuate you don't need to evacuate to some far off place but locally if possible (Florida calls this "Evacuation in place"). The best case is to know someone who isn't in an evacuation zone (and that could be only a few miles, or less, away from your house) that you can stay with. One of my cousins lives on the coast in the Tampa area and their house was flooded by Helene. They'd evacuated but only to a friend's house about a mile inland that wasn't in an evacuation zone. They were fine. They are planning to do that again late tomorrow, too, if it looks like it's necessary. And since they are only going a short distance they can go last minute. It's also what I've always done in the major storms I've been through. Shelters are also an option but depending on your circumstances may not be a good option, especially if you're elderly or infirm.

Building code: Since Andrew, Florida has had very strict building codes. There is talk in a number of posts above about wood frame homes... Except for old homes, wood frame homes aren't a thing in Florida. They are all CBS construction with really strict requirements for things like windows and roof attachment. Public schools all look like bomb shelters since they generally have to double as hurricane shelters.

Insurance: I don't know about inland counties but along the coasts windstorm insurance is almost entirely limited to Citizens - the largest insurer in the state. And Citizens has taken to going out of its way to kick people off for any reason they can invent leaving no options at all. (if you've got Citizens you have likely experienced a "surprise" home inspection by a Citizens contract inspector and if you haven't, you likely will.) Private insurers don't provide flood insurance at all and ordinary insurers will try as hard as they can to classify any claims as flood damage so they don't have to pay. They suck.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,067
Subscriptor
L. Ron could write well, he just didn't bother to do it much. He worked as a hack, with a specially built typewriter that had keys for common words (the, and,) and was loaded with a paper roll so he didn't have to change pages. You'd think that when he was concocting his religion he would have done a better job, but perhaps some of the more egregious parts were written by the yahoos who followed him in the business.
Decent books: The Lieutenant (presaging the terror of WW2); Slaves of Sleep (early example of modern isekai fiction)

Will now follow the reports of the hurricane and Clearwater....
There's someone on Reddit that goes by u/elrondhubbard and I have never been more jealous of a handle.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)
Storm surge is a direct result of low pressure moving across open water which tends to make the water rise. Wind has little to do with the height of storm surge and more to do with the geography of the land and where and how it meets the water, Add in the tides and it's all physics. The storm surge is now forecasted to be 10 to 20 feet above sea level. Anyone who doesn't realize this is a catastrophe aiming right for them better put their affairs in order.

Actually, the surge is caused by the wind. Everything else is a plus.
 
Upvote
-3 (0 / -3)
Hmmm...that makes sceintology sound like a scam (aka cult) religion promulgated by a very bad science fiction writer as a way to dodge taxes and bilk believers.
Note that only the "science fiction writer" part sets it aside from other religions in any meaningful way. You say "aliens in DC-8s", I say "world-wide flood". You say "thetans", I say "immortal soul". There is no fundamental difference other than an idiotic veneer of respectability through sheer age.

They are all scams, they are all cults, they all love to dodge taxes, and mostly exist to bilk their followers. Need I remind you, the Roe v Wade repeal is a direct consequence of "Christian" "universities" standing to lose their tax-exempt status over not wanting to desegregate 50-ish years ago.

I have yet to meet an American Evangelical that couldn't do with a heaping helping of Matthew 6 and 7 applied directly to the noggin in stone tablet form.
 
Upvote
12 (15 / -3)