I guess "efficiently genocides its minorities" here means "no solid evidence ever be presented while countless videos are showing minorities walking on the streets freely".
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4vBJtioHrQ
I guess "efficiently genocides its minorities" here means "no solid evidence ever be presented while countless videos are showing minorities walking on the streets freely".
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4vBJtioHrQ
It's hard to believe that they would react in any other way.It's almost like the US sanctions allowed Huawei to jumpstart the Chinese semiconductor business. They had to spend the money somewhere and they capitalized on the opportunity.
I guess "efficiently genocides its minorities" here means "no solid evidence ever be presented while countless videos are showing minorities walking on the streets freely".
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4vBJtioHrQ
China's flagship smartphone maker pulled off the feat despite sanctions.
Well, those rights can be taken away if a Constitutional Amendment were to be passed and ratified that removes them. Or if our government is ever violently overthrown (which it almost was nearly 3 years ago).[...]
No matter how small your group, there are certain rights listed out in black and white that no majority or even super majority can take away from you!
[...]
It is well known to Chinese that people living in Xinjiang suffer from extra restrictions, like more frequent and enhanced security checks and internet censorship, compared to the rest of mainland China. But... (A) These restrictions apply to all people living there, including Han Chinese. You can't skip the security check at the entrance of a subway station because you look like a Han. (B) Do those restrictions constitute "genocide"? Is the bar of genocide that low?I don't care how fancy Urumqi looks today. As a traveler who visited Urumqi and Kashi (Kashgar) back in 2009, I was fortunate to win the trust of some local Uighurs - who told me the numerous restrictions they must live under, day to day. I don't think this Indian youtuber had any in-depth conversations with local Uighurs? On the surface, Urumqi and even the more remote Kashgar are doing well economically. And I think herein lies the problem: our news media (CNN, etc.) seldom show the positive sides of societies we deem 'our enemies' - so we get a slanted, almost caricature understanding of those societies (Iran is another example).
The persecutions are real. But so are the economic progress. And in some ways, even social progress. I wish our government and news media will present to us all facets, and not just focus on some and filter out others -- to avoid 'complicating the message' or whatever.
But at the very least you must admit that the scenes in all these videos are real, right? All videos are showing minorities are walking on the streets, shops everywhere full of merchandise being sold, restaurants full of customers enjoying their meals... You can count tens of thousands of minority faces in all these videos, including man, women, children and elders. You are not gonna say that they are all paid actors, are you?Fly to North Korea, you'll get a guided tour and find out how amazingly well-off the country is.
China flies youtubers to carefully curated areas and has handlers follow them to make sure they don't stray from the path. If you set up a youtube channel and gather any kind of a following you can experience it yourself.
Genocide doesn't have to mean "mass murder." It's any systematic and intentional destruction of a unique population--whether cultural, religious, ethnic, or racial-- in such a way that's meant to prevent it existing anymore. That means doing things like stealing children away from parents, and preventing them from learning the same culture/language of their forebears, thus making the culture cease to exist. This is exactly what the US and Canada and various other Western colonial powers did with natives in the 'New' World and Africa, Polynesia, etc. They did it with murder sometimes, but just as often "reeducation" and child theft. That's what China is currently doing to any number of minority, non-Han populations as well. Many in China might even genuinely believe that these minorities are better off economically or socially as a result. But the point is, it's still genocide, and the minorities still don't get to just refuse or vote "no."It is well known to Chinese that people living in Xinjiang suffer from extra restrictions, like more frequent and enhanced security checks and internet censorship, compared to the rest of mainland China. But... (A) These restrictions apply to all people living there, including Han Chinese. You can't skip the security check at the entrance of a subway station because you look like a Han. (B) Do those restrictions constitute "genocide"? Is the bar of genocide that low?
1. NK - True.Fly to North Korea, you'll get a guided tour and find out how amazingly well-off the country is.
China flies youtubers to carefully curated areas and has handlers follow them to make sure they don't stray from the path. If you set up a youtube channel and gather any kind of a following you can experience it yourself.
I would say you're wrong to assume. It's not impossible that TSMC was compromised, but the quoted costs imply that they're pulling an Intel here:Am I wrong to assume? I'd say TSMC was compromised and IP theft is China's number one tool. Plus there are some EU companies that will always want to sell "parts" and "toolings" that get past tariffs and sanctions. And just look at nVidia wanting to sell AI chips to China, even though its not permitted. Greed is the rope they'll hang you and others with.
That's the sign the sanctions are working. 30% yield means each chip costs 3x what it would cost TSMC, and state funding means the infrastructure costs slow down the entire economyIt's almost like the US sanctions allowed Huawei to jumpstart the Chinese semiconductor business. They had to spend the money somewhere and they capitalized on the opportunity.
I dunno, sounds like sanctions were useful. SMIC and the state are hobbled by high chip manufacturing costs. Where Apple and TSMC can spend $13b to go from 5nm to 3nm, China, Huawei, and SMIC have to spend several times more just to keep 7nm in volume production, and even more than that to develop 5nm and later 3nm. It's akin to trying to compete in a race with the parking brake on. You have to burn through more fuel, use a larger displacement engine, and replace the brakes far more often just to stay in the race with no expectation of ever winning.This shouldn't have surprised anyone (and probably didn't, privately). Sanctions were only ever going to delay a nation with China's resources. Next up, we'll all pretend to be surprised when they succeed in producing a home-grown alternative to ASML tooling that, while a few generations short of state-of-the-art, provides them with a stable platform to iterate on.
Sanctions aren't useless, but they aren't a magic wand either.
To be able to do this they did not have to compromise TSMC, they used double or quad patterning to achieve this (which explains the lower yields and increased number of steps required to produce the chips). According to the referenced wikipedia article this principle has been first demonstrated in 1983, so it has been around for a while.Am I wrong to assume? I'd say TSMC was compromised and IP theft is China's number one tool. Plus there are some EU companies that will always want to sell "parts" and "toolings" that get past tariffs and sanctions. And just look at nVidia wanting to sell AI chips to China, even though its not permitted. Greed is the rope they'll hang you and others with.
You make it sound as if we, the US, haven't engaged in the same thing, with a far, far, smaller majority of white people.As a naturalized American citizen... one of the best thing about our own political system is the insertion of the "Bill of Rights" - a big 'thank you' to Thomas Jefferson! No matter how small your group, there are certain rights listed out in black and white that no majority or even super majority can take away from you! No need to fear the "tyranny of the majority" even if you hold an unpopular opinion about almost anything!
No such thing in China. There, the Han people make up something like 92% of the population, with the remaining paltry 8% comprising Tibetans, Uighurs, etc., etc. - all of them a super minority by definition. And if the Han people believe their system is so superior that they need to "civilize" the minorities even to the extent of forcibly taking minority children away from their parents and into boarding schools... so be it... for the good of the country (and ostensibly for the eventual "good" of the minority peoples themselves)!
Sounds like it's also effective in the long term when you consider, per the article, 30% yields of 7nm, and ongoing subsidies and support. Imagine how expensive 5nm and 3nm is going to be. It's like trying to race with a parking brake applied.As horrible as the above, is it even more horrible to hobble (as much as we could) the betterment of 1.398 B people, as collective punishment for the 0.02 B persecuted? Particularly in a dictatorship where the former have no say in the matter?
Then there is the practical matter of how effective sanctions really are? Just reading the hoops Huawei and SMIC had to jump through, I believe sanctions are effective in the short term - but when applied to a society with sufficient size, wealth and brain power - sanctions also have the effect of spurring them on - which ends up counter productive to our objectives.
No, it's not unthinkable. The system evolved but the people are still fundamentally the same (people are always just people). Dress codes, haircut rules, tailored curriculum, and laws exist to suppress the minority (Disney vs DeSantis is a notably and exceptionally visible battle of the majority vs the minority here).Finally, food for thought: When America itself was developing, it was also deemed acceptable, even desirable, that savage Indian children needed to be given a Christian, progressive education! And we all knew the aftermath of that!?! Today, the thought of snatching children away from specific minority groups to be remolded into the ways of the majority is unthinkable!
That's the point. We're not that different.A change for the better, certainly. But I am not sure what drove the change? That we are now a better, more decent people? Or because most all Indian children today are already in our public school system anyway (for better and for worse)? IOW, if circumstances change, and we are back into developing-country mode with a large minority that are just so different from our own... will we (or future Americans) repeat the same... again? I am not 100% sure that we can assume we will never repeat this mistake again. Just look at the number of people insisting on 'English Only' today?? The majority seems 'perpetually' tempted to remode minorities who behave differently?
We don't have adequate protection; we have some, sure, but I wouldn't call it adequate when 'living while black' is an unfortunate thing, that incidentally applies to all minorities at different levels.But thank Heavens we have the Bill of Rights. That's at least some protection.
[Edit to Add]: I want to emphasize past doing's by us or anyone else in no way justifies anyone else repeating the same today. My bringing all this up is (1) wondering out loud whether this form of persecution is actually inherent in our human nature (cause Britain, Australia, Canada, etc., etc. also did resort to forced education of minority children in their past)... and (2) expressing thankfulness that in our country (but not many others), we have the Bill of Rights that (if enforced properly) can provide adquate protection for minorities.
BTW, are there any reports claiming that all foreign people travelling in China will get a guided tour? If true, there will be LOTS OF guided tours needed because there are literally millions of foreigners traveling in China each year. But strangely, I've rarely seen people claiming that. Maybe you could book a ticket to China and see if there will be a guided tour waiting there for you without any arrangements prior to the trip.Fly to North Korea, you'll get a guided tour and find out how amazingly well-off the country is.
He's walking around a specific part of town (which he's not permitted to leave). The Han in the area likely actually live there but the whole thing is set up like a theme park (where Uyghurs got to choose between "reeducation" camp and this, they aren't paid). Ever notice how every single one of these videos has the same basic themes? Going to a market, touting the things sold there, insisting there is no genocide and no concentration camps? It's because the script was written by the local government.But at the very least you must admit that the scenes in all these videos are real, right? All videos are showing minorities are walking on the streets, shops everywhere full of merchandise being sold, restaurants full of customers enjoying their meals... You can count tens of thousands of minority faces in all these videos, including man, women, children and elders. You are not gonna say that they are all paid actors, are you?
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/12/13/technology/china-propaganda-youtube-influencers.htmlBTW, are there any reports claiming that all foreign people travelling in China will get a guided tour? If true, there will be LOTS OF guided tours needed because there are literally millions of foreigners traveling in China each year. But strangely, I've rarely seen people claiming that. Maybe you could book a ticket to China and see if there will be a guided tour waiting there for you without any arrangements prior to the trip.
It actually worked exactly as planned.If you make someone live without you, they find out that they can live without you.
I'm not saying that the US should put chips with backdoors in their equipment, so some embargos are simply defensive, but China isn't N.Korea. You cut them off from something, they will steal it and/or home grow it and all you've done in the long run is taken away your own power.
It was foolishly simplistic to think the result would be anything other than what it was.
Money quote
"Industry insiders close to SMIC acknowledge it is possible some equipment was obtained in violation of export controls."
Also.... China graduates 5-10x more STEM degrees every year vs. the US. They may not have the most 'elite' institutions....but they make up for it in sheer numbers.
Sure. And 10,000 monkeys sitting at typewriters long enough may hypothetically crank out Shakespeare. Never mind that China keeps getting caught stealing.Before blaming China for "theft" of everything, remember, laws of physics work all the same in every corner of the known universe. Whatever can be developed in the West can and will be developed in China or anywhere else in the world as well, given sufficient resources like money and talents, which China doesn't lack at present.
The chip is also an ARM design and they overclocked the hell out of it. So it is not even a chinese design.tl;dr they didn't
China already had DUV machines (purchased in 2020) that were technically capable of 7nm (with horrible yields). SMIC even produced 7nm chips a couple years ago.
For anyone curious - some experts estimate SMIC's yield to be as low as 15% using DUV for 7nm. Going any lower will result in exponentially worse results.
a shit ton of money, respected positions, sometimes with a whole new life (like new GF/wife). if you haven't heard of these stories, they get pretty wild - especially for Taiwanese, Japanese and Koreans...Let’s not forget that while companies are blocked from helping China, they could have gotten help from people returning to China. How much incentive would China provide to a technology leader to give up their citizenship or status elsewhere to return to China and help them in critical areas?
You're right, there are plenty of educated people in China that would love to compete on the world stage. They aren't the problem, their government's policies are (notably their lax approach to intellectual property protections and extreme corruption).China is full of dynamic, passionate people working at their absolute hardest to compete on the global stage.
Our attempt to hold them down now when they are becoming a peer competitor just comes off as sour grapes.
I hope now at least the false narrative that China can’t innovate on its own will wither away. EVs, battery tech, ADAS, China is at the forefront of all those technologies.
My question is, what the hell is the EU doing??? Is their entire economy going to be based on delicious food and monuments?
Wait what? They pulled this off using equipment they got from the West. What uniquely Chinese technology innovation do you see here?China is full of dynamic, passionate people working at their absolute hardest to compete on the global stage.
Our attempt to hold them down now when they are becoming a peer competitor just comes off as sour grapes.
I hope now at least the false narrative that China can’t innovate on its own will wither away. EVs, battery tech, ADAS, China is at the forefront of all those technologies.
My question is, what the hell is the EU doing??? Is their entire economy going to be based on delicious food and monuments?
It happens all the time outside China too.You're right, there are plenty of educated people in China that would love to compete on the world stage. They aren't the problem, their government's policies are (notably their lax approach to intellectual property protections and extreme corruption).
Why innovate when your competitor can steal your work and undercut you? It happens all the time inside of China.
Not anywhere near the level that it happens inside China. If someone steals your design in the west, you can sue them and have some chance of restoring your business. In China unless you've bribed the right people they'll ignore you.It happens all the time outside China too.
Oh yeah, a little bit of genocide is all the world needs for "progress" huh? Listen to yourself ffs... thats the exact same message the Soviets, GLF and Hitler used! There is no "benefit" to a social engine that requires mass murder to function. Not the imaginary type, but the "work in this mine for the state until you die" or "welp, you can't reform so you get to be fuel" type of oppression.As a traveler who visited Urumqi and Kashi (Kashgar) back in 2009, I was fortunate to win the trust of some local Uighurs - who told me the numerous restrictions they must live under, day to day. I don't think this Indian youtuber had any in-depth conversations with local Uighurs? On the surface, Urumqi and even the more remote Kashgar are doing well economically. And I think herein lies the problem: our news media (CNN, etc.) seldom show the positive sides of societies we deem 'our enemies' - so we get a slanted, almost caricature understanding of those societies (Iran is another example).
The persecutions are real. But so are the economic progress. And in some ways, even social progress. I wish our government and news media will present to us all facets, and not just focusing on some and filtering out others -- to avoid 'complicating the message' or whatever.
I'm pretty sure everyone realizes there are modern, growing cities in China.As a traveler who visited Urumqi and Kashi (Kashgar) back in 2009, I was fortunate to win the trust of some local Uighurs - who told me the numerous restrictions they must live under, day to day. I don't think this Indian youtuber had any in-depth conversations with local Uighurs? On the surface, Urumqi and even the more remote Kashgar are doing well economically. And I think herein lies the problem: our news media (CNN, etc.) seldom show the positive sides of societies we deem 'our enemies' - so we get a slanted, almost caricature understanding of those societies (Iran is another example).
The persecutions are real. But so are the economic progress. And in some ways, even social progress. I wish our government and news media will present to us all facets, and not just focusing on some and filtering out others -- to avoid 'complicating the message' or whatever.
It did. And still does, to a much lesser extent. Here's how it works.You're right, there are plenty of educated people in China that would love to compete on the world stage. They aren't the problem, their government's policies are (notably their lax approach to intellectual property protections and extreme corruption).
Why innovate when your competitor can steal your work and undercut you? It happens all the time inside of China.
Bear in mind China has been known to employ intelligence operations that involve comment-board activity to shape the narrative on issues close to the Chinese government. It seems difficult to imagine an issue closer to the Chinese government than this.Oh yeah, a little bit of genocide is all the world needs for "progress" huh? Listen to yourself ffs... thats the exact same message the Soviets, GLF and Hitler used! There is no "benefit" to a social engine that requires mass murder to function. Not the imaginary type, but the "work in this mine for the state until you die" or "welp, you can't reform so you get to be fuel" type of oppression.
Why are people suddenly okay with these people!?!? This isn't ancient history like these losers try to compare to, this is TODAY, and it's sickening seeing people excusing it because they get a iPhone out of it...
China is also notorious for patent and paper packing. Many of them are low-quality but they know that international organizations will pick them up and hype China. For reference research papers and patents vary widely in terms of quality in all countries, simply having a patent or writing a research paper doesn't mean much of anything.It did. And still does, to a much lesser extent. Here's how it works.
If you are a poor, backward society with precious few resources... you try to take all the short cuts you can. Japan used to copy. Then Taiwan and S. Korea. All were notorious back in their day. But not so much today. So what happened? They all became more decent people?? Or simple Economics at work?
Countries with little intellectual property of their own tend to enforce intellectual property laws only half heartedly. Why beat up tiny embryonic domestic startup's struggling to stand on their own on behalf of giant foreign businesses? But by and by, domestic companies begin to grow in stature and sophistication. And they begin to pay taxes too. No coincidence at all, but it is at around this time that governments will start enforcing intellectual property (and other) laws - more and more in line with advanced economies. Because now, there actually is something worthwhile domestically to protect!
Your understanding of China is now at least 10 years behind. Google up reputable sources of the number of patents Chinese companies are now filing. Quantity does not denote quality or sophistication. But still a good sign that Chinese companies now have property they deem worthy of protection! Huawei was not sanctioned because it was caught stealing. It was sanctioned because we got alarmed at how fast it (and others) are growing in size and sophistication.
Well, at least that's some improvements compared to people claiming "millions of minorities are being killed or imprisoned in China".Genocide doesn't have to mean "mass murder." It's any systematic and intentional destruction of a unique population--whether cultural, religious, ethnic, or racial-- in such a way that's meant to prevent it existing anymore. That means doing things like stealing children away from parents, and preventing them from learning the same culture/language of their forebears, thus making the culture cease to exist. This is exactly what the US and Canada and various other Western colonial powers did with natives in the 'New' World and Africa, Polynesia, etc. They did it with murder sometimes, but just as often "reeducation" and child theft. That's what China is currently doing to any number of minority, non-Han populations as well. Many in China might even genuinely believe that these minorities are better off economically or socially as a result. But the point is, it's still genocide, and the minorities still don't get to just refuse or vote "no."
Oh yeah, I'm keenly familiar with disinformatzya. You'll see me slapping around the stooges for fun from time to time lol. Sadly, a lot of times, they are domestic. Although a lot of times they are just a operative living abroad so they can ping on the local culture and not appear too obvious. You'll see them get real quiet for a bit when I come around because I love to try forcing them to acknowledge things that will get them jailed and face the evil of their governments first hand lol.Bear in mind China has been known to employ intelligence operations that involve comment-board activity to shape the narrative on issues close to the Chinese government. It seems difficult to imagine an issue closer to the Chinese government than this.
When addressing obvious propaganda, don't assume you are talking to someone from the West.
That's a whole another can of worms. I actually have a problem with any one country dictating to everyone else whom they may or may not trade with. This will come back to bite us, I fear.China is also notorious for patent and paper packing. Many of them are low-quality but they know that international organizations will pick them up and hype China. For reference research papers and patents vary widely in terms of quality in all countries, simply having a patent or writing a research paper doesn't mean much of anything.
Huawei wasn't caught stealing, it was caught selling US computers/components to Iran.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ng-prohibited-u-s-gear-to-iran-idUSKBN20P1VA/