To my knowledge, only the Framework 12 has stylus support (and the hinge to make it useful)Not happy with political choices the Framework team has made, but I bought a Framework 12 before they did that. That device has a touch screen and it is compatible with my Microsoft Surface stylus. I expect this new one will also have that compatibility.
And it’s the first touchscreen display available for the Laptop 13, though Framework’s press release doesn’t mention any kind of stylus or pen compatibility.
It is the same cost from Framework as buying it directly from Microsoft. I personally like that the Windows license cost is both 1) explicitly stated, and 2) optional!Windows is $100? Lol what?![]()
There are pros and cons.I really like the idea of LPCAMM2, speaking to having integrated-memory like speeds while still being upgradable, etc. I hope they catch on and don't become one of "neat but lost" advances
Also, windows never touches the metal. Framework also doesn't require you to have the dumb copilot key!It is the same cost from Framework as buying it directly from Microsoft. I personally like that the Windows license cost is both 1) explicitly stated, and 2) optional!
If you don't want to use Windows, you don't have to pay for it, unlike other OEMs where it is just baked into the cost. Also, if you have access to bulk / discounted licensing, you can just get the machines without a license, and use your own!
I really hope that isn't the case. I'd definitely buy the new screen just for that alone.To my knowledge, only the Framework 12 has stylus support (and the hinge to make it useful)
I'm pretty sure the last time I employed this memory upgrade strategy was during the Bush administration. It's always been complete kits ever since. Modern memory is incredibly sensitive to matched sets if you want to squeeze every last ounce of performance out of it.There are pros and cons.
Pro, you can get tighter timings more easily.
Con, while you can upgrade--you're going to have to toss your entire old CAMM module and entirely replace it. E.g. you have 16GB of RAM, you can no longer keep a DIMM and just partially-upgrade to 32GB or 24GB. Which is more ewaste. Because CAMM is a dual channel solution, so to have two CAMM pads you're need a sever-class quad-channel setup.
Interesting! If you are comfortable sharing, what use case do you have for a stylus on a 180 degree hinged screen? (Compared to the Framework 12's 360 degree hinge)I really hope that isn't the case. I'd definitely buy the new screen just for that alone.
I did it in a laptop during the GR. I've done it with desktops too more recently.I'm pretty sure the last time I employed this memory upgrade strategy was during the Bush administration. It's always been complete kits ever since. Modern memory is incredibly sensitive to matched sets if you want to squeeze every last ounce of performance out of it.
Laptops either have RAM soldered or only 1 slot available anyways. So this is still better then any other laptop. And the only way forward when building a modular laptop since Intel and AMD now require either soldered or LPCAMM2. Soldered being the cheapest option for manufacturers.There are pros and cons.
Pro, you can get tighter timings more easily.
Con, while you can upgrade--you're going to have to toss your entire old CAMM module and entirely replace it. E.g. you have 16GB of RAM, you can no longer keep a DIMM and just partially-upgrade to 32GB or 24GB. Which is more ewaste. Because CAMM is a dual channel solution, so to have two CAMM pads you're need a sever-class quad-channel setup.
Also, windows never touches the metal. Framework also doesn't require you to have the dumb copilot key!
The current (well, now old) FW13 has two slots.Laptops either have RAM soldered or only 1 slot available anyways. So this is still better then any other laptop. And the only way forward when building a modular laptop since Intel and AMD now require either soldered or LPCAMM2. Soldered being the cheapest option for manufacturers.
That's a pretty minor con. I have never had a laptop with only one of the two memory channels populated, so a memory upgrade has meant ditching all the old RAM for new sticks anyway. I guess you could go with just replacing one stick and going mismatched, but if I need more memory I'm not half assing it. At least back when memory didn't cost an arm and a dick.There are pros and cons.
Pro, you can get tighter timings more easily.
Con, while you can upgrade--you're going to have to toss your entire old CAMM module and entirely replace it. E.g. you have 16GB of RAM, you can no longer keep a DIMM and just partially-upgrade to 32GB or 24GB. Which is more ewaste. Because CAMM is a dual channel solution, so to have two CAMM pads you're need a sever-class quad-channel setup.
Also, windows never touches the metal. Framework also doesn't require you to have the dumb copilot key!
They also have a bad habit of pushing BIOS updates out to release even while their external beta releases have reported issues. I take this as they are too small a customer to have their third-party contractor prioritize them.The only two things that would make it perfect would be :
1. True commitment to BIOS updates. While they have improved, they still have a looong way to go. Remember when logo fail took like 2 years before the CVE was fixed to customers? It will take time for me to trust them.
My last Dell XPS from work had two DIMMs. I upgraded both so I could run a couple of VMs without the poor thing falling on its face. It sure put the fan to work though.Laptops either have RAM soldered or only 1 slot available anyways. So this is still better then any other laptop. And the only way forward when building a modular laptop since Intel and AMD now require either soldered or LPCAMM2. Soldered being the cheapest option for manufacturers.
My framework Desktop is getting this too:They also have a bad habit of pushing BIOS updates out to release even while their external beta releases have reported issues. I take this as they are too small a customer to have their third-party contractor prioritize them.
Their current 7040 BIOS for example is having a lot of issues for people who use external docks even though Framework claims it's stable: https://community.frame.work/t/framework-laptop-13-ryzen-7040-bios-3-18-release-stable/79967/
Whatever the reason, it's enough of a reason for me to not be interested in buying any more hardware from them. Which is a shame because the chassis improvements look nice.
Yikes, not a fan of their it's a big tent approach answer. A bit tone deaf considering what some of the people in the tent are doing now, not just saying anymore.Not happy with political choices the Framework team has made, but I bought a Framework 12 before they did that. That device has a touch screen and it is compatible with my Microsoft Surface stylus. I expect this new one will also have that compatibility.
Thanks for sharing this. I’ve followed the stories for a few years and have really enjoyed what the company was putting out.Not happy with political choices the Framework team has made, but I bought a Framework 12 before they did that. That device has a touch screen and it is compatible with my Microsoft Surface stylus. I expect this new one will also have that compatibility.
Well, crap. Framework had been on my list of alternatives to ThinkPads for when I eventually replace my T495, but I think I can say that’s out of the question now.Not happy with political choices the Framework team has made, but I bought a Framework 12 before they did that. That device has a touch screen and it is compatible with my Microsoft Surface stylus. I expect this new one will also have that compatibility.
And it's still dicey to get even pairs of matched sets to play nice together. When I built my current AM5 build, I went with 32GB of RAM -- two matched 16GB sticks. But very quickly discovered I needed 64GB minimum (I'm pretty much sitting with 20-30GB of RAM in use all the time, etc.)I'm pretty sure the last time I employed this memory upgrade strategy was during the Bush administration. It's always been complete kits ever since. Modern memory is incredibly sensitive to matched sets if you want to squeeze every last ounce of performance out of it.
That's normal.And it's still dicey to get even pairs of matched sets to play nice together. When I built my current AM5 build, I went with 32GB of RAM -- two matched 16GB sticks. But very quickly discovered I needed 64GB minimum (I'm pretty much sitting with 20-30GB of RAM in use all the time, etc.)
So I bought another identical set (my board is dual-channel, but has 4x sockets...two dual-channel setups) and couldn't get the same 6000 level overclock with 4x as I could with the previous 2x. Using the autotune feature, my current system is currently staying happy at around 5800 in regard to memory bandwidth.
I wonder if they would be able to refresh the Desktop to use LPCAMM2.Intel mandates the use of faster LPDDR5X. You can have DIMMs, but only with lower-performing GPUs that would probably have been slower than the Intel and AMD hardware Framework was already shipping. But Framework also clearly didn’t want to give up modular RAM, something it did to make the Framework Desktop work (AMD similarly requires LPDDR5X for that desktop’s Radeon RX 8050S and 8060S).
Well, nice to be you, I guess??I'm pretty sure the last time I employed this memory upgrade strategy was during the Bush administration. It's always been complete kits ever since. Modern memory is incredibly sensitive to matched sets if you want to squeeze every last ounce of performance out of it.
The number of people who upgrade their laptops at all is probably roughly fuck all. The fraction that will only half upgrade their RAM is, well, less than fuck all.Well, nice to be you, I guess??
For those of us who aren't entirely made out of money, buy one stick now, one stick later is a pretty common strategy. It's not like you can't buy the same stick later, you know. You just sacrifice some (very little for most real purposes) performance now, for much cheaper upgradability later.
LPDDR5x is mandatory on the Core Ultra X7 and X9, so it's either memory-down or LPCAMM2. They didn't have an option of a SO-DIMM design and it would be bad for both battery life and performance anyway.Laptops either have RAM soldered or only 1 slot available anyways. So this is still better then any other laptop. And the only way forward when building a modular laptop since Intel and AMD now require either soldered or LPCAMM2. Soldered being the cheapest option for manufacturers.
ThinkPad T14 G5/G6 AMD rock two ram slots as does my recent Legion 5 AMD.Laptops either have RAM soldered or only 1 slot available anyways. So this is still better then any other laptop. And the only way forward when building a modular laptop since Intel and AMD now require either soldered or LPCAMM2. Soldered being the cheapest option for manufacturers.