...The FCC previously passed net neutrality rules in 2010, relying on some of its weaker authority, but the rules were largely overturned after a Verizon lawsuit.
By winning that case, Verizon inadvertently opened itself and all other Internet providers up to even stricter rules. The new rules go beyond the net neutrality rules passed in 2010. And this time around, the FCC is applying the rules equally to fixed and mobile broadband, whereas its 2010 rules went easier on Verizon's wireless subsidiary and other cellular companies...
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560389#p28560389:1qil4kta said:thebackwash[/url]":1qil4kta]This is like a dream. I can't believe that it actually happened. Only 5 years ago title II classification was a remote hypothetical, and now it actually came to pass. Wow.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560433#p28560433:icdp7jtw said:Peevester[/url]":icdp7jtw]HOT DAMN, he really did it!
I sense a disturbance in the wingnutverse.
So ISPs deliberately congesting peering points and refusing to upgrade them is not a problem?"The Internet is not broken. There is no problem for the government to solve," (Pai) said.
O'Rielly":1p4qscyq said:Let me start by issuing apologies. First, I am just sick about what Chairman Wheeler was forced to go through during this process. It was disgraceful to have the Administration overtake the commission’s rulemaking process and dictate an outcome for pure political purposes. It is so disturbing to know that those efforts were about illegitimately pushing a larger political cause mostly unrelated to technology. This administration went so far beyond what has ever been attempted, and its inappropriate interference in the commission’s activities will forever change this institution.
Additionally, I am sorry to the staff members that were forced to prepare a half-baked, illogical, internally inconsistent and indefensible document. For an institution that prides itself on quality of work and legal and technical expertise, this document is anything but. I guess that an artificial deadline to meet the radical protestors’ demands means that it is more likely that this item gets overturned by the courts because the work and thoughtful analysis needed to actually defend this completely flawed agenda is not included in the text.
Today, a majority of the commission attempts to usurp the authority of Congress by re-writing the Communications Act to suit its own “values” and political ends.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560411#p28560411:24obiwj3 said:THavoc[/url]":24obiwj3]This is great news!
Now, those that said it was 300 plus pages of regulations will finally shut up when they see it was only 8 pages and that they were lied to this whole time by their talking heads.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560545#p28560545:2os7nd2s said:foreignreign[/url]":2os7nd2s]Wait wait what.
O'Rielly":2os7nd2s said:Let me start by issuing apologies. First, I am just sick about what Chairman Wheeler was forced to go through during this process. It was disgraceful to have the Administration overtake the commission’s rulemaking process and dictate an outcome for pure political purposes. It is so disturbing to know that those efforts were about illegitimately pushing a larger political cause mostly unrelated to technology. This administration went so far beyond what has ever been attempted, and its inappropriate interference in the commission’s activities will forever change this institution.
Additionally, I am sorry to the staff members that were forced to prepare a half-baked, illogical, internally inconsistent and indefensible document. For an institution that prides itself on quality of work and legal and technical expertise, this document is anything but. I guess that an artificial deadline to meet the radical protestors’ demands means that it is more likely that this item gets overturned by the courts because the work and thoughtful analysis needed to actually defend this completely flawed agenda is not included in the text.
Today, a majority of the commission attempts to usurp the authority of Congress by re-writing the Communications Act to suit its own “values” and political ends.
Am I actually reading this? This isn't a joke?
How can this guy even begin to say this with a straight face? This is just flat out disgusting.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560415#p28560415:1qxiltv2 said:youdothescience[/url]":1qxiltv2]Hey Wheeler - thanks for proving us wrong. You had the chutzpah to stand up to your former bosses and make the right decision.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560545#p28560545:wjlt9dtu said:foreignreign[/url]":wjlt9dtu]Wait wait what.
O'Rielly":wjlt9dtu said:Let me start by issuing apologies. First, I am just sick about what Chairman Wheeler was forced to go through during this process. It was disgraceful to have the Administration overtake the commission’s rulemaking process and dictate an outcome for pure political purposes. It is so disturbing to know that those efforts were about illegitimately pushing a larger political cause mostly unrelated to technology. This administration went so far beyond what has ever been attempted, and its inappropriate interference in the commission’s activities will forever change this institution.
Additionally, I am sorry to the staff members that were forced to prepare a half-baked, illogical, internally inconsistent and indefensible document. For an institution that prides itself on quality of work and legal and technical expertise, this document is anything but. I guess that an artificial deadline to meet the radical protestors’ demands means that it is more likely that this item gets overturned by the courts because the work and thoughtful analysis needed to actually defend this completely flawed agenda is not included in the text.
Today, a majority of the commission attempts to usurp the authority of Congress by re-writing the Communications Act to suit its own “values” and political ends.
Am I actually reading this? This isn't a joke?
How can this guy even begin to say this with a straight face? This is just flat out disgusting.
HOW DARE THOSE PEOPLE USE THEIR 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS![url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560611#p28560611:1b8x3s2w said:Jackattak[/url]":1b8x3s2w][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560545#p28560545:1b8x3s2w said:foreignreign[/url]":1b8x3s2w]Wait wait what.
O'Rielly":1b8x3s2w said:Let me start by issuing apologies. First, I am just sick about what Chairman Wheeler was forced to go through during this process. It was disgraceful to have the Administration overtake the commission’s rulemaking process and dictate an outcome for pure political purposes. It is so disturbing to know that those efforts were about illegitimately pushing a larger political cause mostly unrelated to technology. This administration went so far beyond what has ever been attempted, and its inappropriate interference in the commission’s activities will forever change this institution.
Additionally, I am sorry to the staff members that were forced to prepare a half-baked, illogical, internally inconsistent and indefensible document. For an institution that prides itself on quality of work and legal and technical expertise, this document is anything but. I guess that an artificial deadline to meet the radical protestors’ demands means that it is more likely that this item gets overturned by the courts because the work and thoughtful analysis needed to actually defend this completely flawed agenda is not included in the text.
Today, a majority of the commission attempts to usurp the authority of Congress by re-writing the Communications Act to suit its own “values” and political ends.
Am I actually reading this? This isn't a joke?
How can this guy even begin to say this with a straight face? This is just flat out disgusting.
"Radical protesters"
HAHAHA what is this, Hunger Games? We're all Precinct 13? Mocking Jay, byotch!!!
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560451#p28560451:2urh8z2s said:DrDenim[/url]":2urh8z2s]Hurray for decency standards on the internet! Can't wait for all the "think if the children" regulation! Provide ID to visit certain sites perhaps?
I'm for net neutrality, but this seems like a terrible idea.
I'm for net neutrality
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=28560639#p28560639:jlb8hsy0 said:greatn[/url]":jlb8hsy0]Where are a bunch of Ewoks to play the "Yub Yub" song when you need them?
(although I'm afraid this is more an end of episode IV situation and the Empire WILL strike back)