Papayas nipping at the Mercs' heels as FP1 ends. The plot thickens.
Maybe McLaren got on top of the harvesting software strategy. I'm expecting Mercedes to switch from engine mode 2 to mode 3 (6 more to go) and carry on regardless.Papayas nipping at the Mercs' heels as FP1 ends. The plot thickens.
McLaren has opted to use energy coming out of the chicane – delivering it a big top speed advantage of more than 20km/h on the start-finish straight.
This results in Piastri being much faster through Turn 1 and puts him around 0.5 seconds ahead of Antonelli going into the Esses.
From there, Mercedes is able to steadily chip away at the McLaren advantage – leaving Antonelli just 0.2 seconds off at the hairpin.
The gap then remains stable up until Spoon where the McLaren elects to use more deployment on the run to 130R.
Piastri’s top speed maxes out at 321km/h here, while the Mercedes keeps pushing up to 330km/h – and the two cars stay with a difference of around 10km/h on the run to the chicane.
This puts the Mercedes marginally ahead going into the chicane, before the McLaren manages to leap ahead across the line with the use of its remaining battery power.
The really evil play would be for the floor to be more 3-dimensional where the top and bottom surfaces are not the same, so that inferring the aero characteristics from a shot of the inside leads to to very wrong conclusions.That was an interesting time.
By the way, I’m pretty sure we got an ultra rare shot of the McLaren floor when it was laying on the ground, when Norris’ car was up on the stands.
I’m pretty sure the team is allowed to move the privacy screens in front of the garage when they remove the floor. So being able to see the whole floor like that?
Got him on track with just over 20 minutes left in FP3. Scary for tomorrow, though. Again.Bad battery for Lando again, cya in Q1 I guess![]()
So does that mean that when Ferrari does eventually run their fancy rear wing, the graphic will then show “//“ “-|” “-\” “=“?
Looking back at the race, The less I am liking the regs with these cars. Piastri almost seemed comfortable in the lead and Kimi bogged down a bit in the back. Was that all due to Oscar being in clean air? Not sure. Even though cars can follow better, there still seems to be a pretty big benefit of clean air. I was surprised that Kimi just kinda ran away and hid when he got in front. Could be that he was just better with the Hards than Oscar was.
Although the next group was battling, it really seemed like it was just a 2026 version of a DRS train. The added amount of deployment was allowing a car behind stay in touch that they wouldn't be able to otherwise. Then it was a cat and mouse game of battery deployment hoping that a move in the chicane wouldn't be followed by a re-pass at T1/T2.
Bearman accident was kinda foreseen with people when they were talking about the speed difference between harvesting and deployment. Colapinto may have drifted left because he was fiddling with his steering wheel. Later on, Leclerc got by George flying past him in the same spot. It looked so bad that the announcers were thinking that there was something seriously wrong with Russell's car. It looks really bad when someone things there is a car problem when it was only because a driver is harvesting battery.....and it lays bare just how much speed these guys are losing in corners because of harvesting/superclipping.
Almost wish they would just have gone with a push-to-pass system only. Give teams a certain amount of boost....and that amount of boost can be "reset/refilled" at a pit stop. Might make a 1-stop strategy less attractive....and give an extra boost for a 2/3 stopper and allow the drivers to push their cars to the limit a bit more. Yea SCs would fuck with that, but SCs fuck with races all the time.
I can see them making a short term adjustment, say throttling the rate that electrical power can be deployed would be the easy fix - battery runs down more slowly => battery lasts longer => smooths out the yo-yo charge-up/deployment curves => less clipping => fewer overspeed differential incidents.And it’s still stupid early in the regulations. Let ‘em breathe a bit.
Yes, lots of things would be solved if F1 dropped the half-ICE / half-electric power distribution, but then what about the marketing, and all the investment in MGU-Ks and power electronics capable of handling the initially proposed 350kW. Besides, even if they brought the electric contribution all the way back to the 120kW of the older regulations, the cars would still de-rate on the final third of straights, because now they don't have the MGU-H to send harvested power at wide-open throttle to the wheels (which it could do, besides charging the battery). The Energy Store remains the same size as it has been since 2014.I can see them making a short term adjustment, say throttling the rate that electrical power can be deployed would be the easy fix - battery runs down more slowly => battery lasts longer => smooths out the yo-yo charge-up/deployment curves => less clipping => fewer overspeed differential incidents.

IMHO, these cars with the old powertrains would've been epic, but that ship has sailed.I'm sure they can figure out how to jam the last reg PUs in to their cars by the time the next race weekend rolls around. Something about money spent developing a different fuel comes to mind too though.
I dunno. The racing looks great, especially from the onboards as long as they aren't clipping. I find it interesting watching the various drivers manage the car's energy/power through the same parts of the track, just too bad that's the cause of the problem for the whole thingThe FIA is kind of stuck aren't they...