Until recently, China's entries in the realm of spaceflight patches often lacked originality.
See full article...
See full article...
Do these Buddhist gods hint at the purpose of China’s super-secret satellites?
- Thread starter JournalBot
- Start date
Then the Ori arc kicked in and Daniel Jackson went all crazy eyed, but hey, SG-1 showed them in the end!
Upvote
7
(8
/
-1)
Speakertoanimals
Ars Praefectus
Terry Pratchett's Death proposed that one must learn to believe in the small lies, such as the Tooth Fairy and the Hogfather in order to be able to believe in the greater fantasies, such as Justice, Duty or Mercy.
Edit:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPS5Yw_YsHA
Upvote
9
(10
/
-1)
Ugh. That's capacity, not transfer rate. Always check your units.
(Even "size of a football field" is bullshit; area, length or volume of the turf? Gah.)
Upvote
0
(2
/
-2)
I often imagine that future archeologists will find depictions of Superman, Batman, Spider-Man, and the Avengers in various artifacts, and then conclude that our civilization worshipped these gods that were part of a shared mythology.
Upvote
12
(12
/
0)
The difference between Buddhism and Monotheistic religions is that Gods in Buddhisms eventually do die with the rest of the Universe and get reincarnated, depending on their karma.
Even Hinduism, out of which Budhism developed has a god or two that supposedly create and unmake the universe together with the rest of the gods.
In Buddhism there is no such thing. There is no absolute deity which created the Universe. Basically in Buddhism all gods die too at the end. Its just that they live super long and are practically immortal while the movie plays. This is the same across all main versions of Buddhism.
The only way to get out of this whole thing is to wake up and so reach Nirvana. Like Buddha did.
Buddha - literally, the awakened one.
- Oh, Nirvana is not "nothing", because the concept of "nothing" is a part of this Universe. It is very difficult to explain what Nirvana is, because it is something outside of all possible concepts that exist or could exist in this Universe. It is unexplainable by words or thoughts. Because those are part of this Universe. And so on. (you can only beat around the bush, as it were)
As for China, Im glad they are putting some pressure on USA. After all USA was doing these same things to everyone else for decades since WW2.
So, its all good gamemanship and healthy competition, for now.
Even Hinduism, out of which Budhism developed has a god or two that supposedly create and unmake the universe together with the rest of the gods.
In Buddhism there is no such thing. There is no absolute deity which created the Universe. Basically in Buddhism all gods die too at the end. Its just that they live super long and are practically immortal while the movie plays. This is the same across all main versions of Buddhism.
The only way to get out of this whole thing is to wake up and so reach Nirvana. Like Buddha did.
Buddha - literally, the awakened one.
- Oh, Nirvana is not "nothing", because the concept of "nothing" is a part of this Universe. It is very difficult to explain what Nirvana is, because it is something outside of all possible concepts that exist or could exist in this Universe. It is unexplainable by words or thoughts. Because those are part of this Universe. And so on. (you can only beat around the bush, as it were)
As for China, Im glad they are putting some pressure on USA. After all USA was doing these same things to everyone else for decades since WW2.
So, its all good gamemanship and healthy competition, for now.
Last edited:
Upvote
8
(10
/
-2)
Exactly. The Jews didn't kick the other gods out of the Temple until after the Babylonian Captivity. You can learn all sorts of weird stuff by reading the Bible. As Martin Luther suggested, don't let other people read it for you.
Upvote
12
(12
/
0)
Upvote
8
(11
/
-3)
As a christian... I've always felt there is a grain of truth in most faiths. A little more suspicious of religions that manage only a few years and revolve around letting a creep bed ones wife or give away your money to one "prophet"... a commonality of the "truth" seems to revolve around peace and goodwill. Like a number of related subjects, it seems unlikely such ideas and beliefs can last for so long, influencing so many, and not have some truth to it.
Naturally, I think my particular school is "most" correct. But acknowledge it is the result of thousands of years of translations. The few fanatics that think they speak for God inherently dont understand their own faith, and like many charlatans, are using faith for their own secular ends. God doesn't need defenders... especially ones that obscure that understanding of one another.
I have a lot of respect for Buddism in particular since there seems to be a fair amount of "truth" in the religion.
Good summation btw.
I also agree on healthy geopolitical competition. Far better it be China over Russia... China doesn't want to destroy the world if it cant rule it.
Upvote
6
(6
/
0)
In American publications, size of a football field, by convention, refers to the length usually 100 yards of a US football field as in "The human infant can travel three football fields in an hour."
Upvote
4
(5
/
-1)
Buddhism doesn't have gods per se. Gods, especially back then, tended to be localized. They were the gods of specific regions and peoples. The Gupta kingdoms where the Buddha taught were wiped out by the Huns. Any local gods were lost as the religion was carried, mainly east, across the Himalayas. Judaism may have developed its universal god that way, shedding locality, demanding supremacy and then, under Christianity, becoming universal. Buddhism and Christianity are the two great missionary faiths.
For an interesting take on how Buddhism meets up with the traditional gods of China, read Journey to the West (Monkey Folk Novel of China). Monkey was the rational aspect of humanity who challenges the heavens but is smacked down by the Buddha and sent on a mission to help bring Buddhism to China. It's more Chaucer than religious allegory but a good place to get some cultural insight.
Those four Chinese gods remind me of the four winds: Boreus, Zephyrus, Notus and Eurus or the four angels at the "corners of the Earth" in Revelations. Maybe China is going to launch three more such satellites, but I wouldn't read too much into the mission patch.
For an interesting take on how Buddhism meets up with the traditional gods of China, read Journey to the West (Monkey Folk Novel of China). Monkey was the rational aspect of humanity who challenges the heavens but is smacked down by the Buddha and sent on a mission to help bring Buddhism to China. It's more Chaucer than religious allegory but a good place to get some cultural insight.
Those four Chinese gods remind me of the four winds: Boreus, Zephyrus, Notus and Eurus or the four angels at the "corners of the Earth" in Revelations. Maybe China is going to launch three more such satellites, but I wouldn't read too much into the mission patch.
Upvote
3
(4
/
-1)
Yet oddly, those tend not to be "religious folk" we find in politics (ranging from school boards up to national office).
But perhaps (as with so much related to religion) the devil is in the definitions. For example, of "lots", "atheist", and "religious". I could not tell you whether I am "atheist" or "religious" without being provided with a rigorous definition of the terms. Though I once did, during the Vietnam war, when filling out forms to apply for conscientious objector status, which limited the acceptable rationale to religion. Whereupon I discovered the truth of lawyers, that if you control the definitions, you can control the outcome of the argument.
Upvote
7
(7
/
0)
* P.S.: That is the speed it can develop, but it usually falls asleep no farther than at the 20-yard line. So "can" in this context should more properly be "could, in theory".
Upvote
2
(2
/
0)
There's some truth to that. (I have also noticed that a high percentage of those evangelists were raised Roman Catholic.)
Never seemed to be much point to me, it's like arguing that the moon is not made of green cheese or the world is not flat, except that those are questions that can actually be scientifically answered..
Upvote
1
(1
/
0)
Ask a Chinese question, expect a Chinese answer, wu. 無. Mu is the Japanese reading of the character. One came before the other.
Upvote
5
(5
/
0)
Quite a bit.
So would the Crusaders, but don't project your arguments on to others.
Yep.
I would tend to, but you're creating a false dichotomy here. Rain on your wedding day is a bad thing. A free ride when you've already paid is a bad thing. Good advice that you just didn't take is a bad thing. Alanis Morissette isn't invading lands and killing non-believers over such bad things. Neither are American atheists.
Nope. I feel very little compulsion to do that. You can live whatever lie you wish so long as you don't force me to go along with it or discriminate against me because I won't believe it.
If only Christian Nationalists, and apparently yourself, would do the same... but nope, you have to control the culture, legislate it, punish those who won't conform to your conception of it...
Last edited:
Upvote
9
(10
/
-1)
Japanese. It's a Zen koan.
I don't know anything about Chinese Buddhism exept that it gave rise to Zen. Sorry about that.
Last edited:
Upvote
3
(3
/
0)
On that note, as someone keenly attuned to nuance and connotation in my native tongue, even then we view the text through the translator’s filters.
Upvote
5
(5
/
0)
From my perspective, religion and logic are incompatible. Everyone is entitled to their beliefs, but I have never been able to "believe" in a god. Too many inconsistencies for me. Why, yes, I am an engineer...
Still, the pantheon provides a fertile ground for project names, sometime with, and sometimes without any relationship between deity and the actual project.
Still, the pantheon provides a fertile ground for project names, sometime with, and sometimes without any relationship between deity and the actual project.
Upvote
5
(5
/
0)
I am atheist, but would not condone states banning religion. As long as it's not being pushed to others.
I do think religion is not based in reality, that doesn't mean that it has no value to folks practicing it.
I would much rather offer people what they find useful in religion without religion. That way religion will not be lost, it will just change into into mythology, similar to the Greek pantheon. Still useful, but nobody confuses it with reality.
Upvote
9
(9
/
0)
If bandwidth (and not latency) is all that matters, then the limiting factor is probably the number of takeoff slots at LAX. Wikipedia says there are around 750 outbound flights per day. So,
70x10^18 bytes/flight x 750 flights/day / (24 hours/day) =~ 2.2 x 10^21 bytes / day. That's around 600 petabaud if I did the math right. Add maybe 50% if the other LA-area airports get in on it.
Assuming an infinite supply of SD cards, of course.
Upvote
6
(6
/
0)
Make it full duplex and you only need as many SD cards as it takes to cover the latency of one round trip, plus an extra buffer to account for data read/write time at each end. In the steady state, there's a finite upper limit for the number of cards required. Not acccounting for faulty card replacement.
In any case there'd be some incentive to develop SD card recycling into a profitable sideline.
(ETA: We're well into XKCD what-if territory now.)
Upvote
5
(5
/
0)
That was before the ATC system was decimated. Now... assume one in 10 aircraft crashes...
Upvote
3
(4
/
-1)
There is need to worry about the military consequences. Surely a lot of progress has been made in the training of the military Psychic Warrior Monks that crackpots Puthoff and Targ championed so much in the 1970s and later. Extreme credulity is required among the perpetually perplexed, when scientific illiteracy alone is simply insufficient.
https://www.coffeeordie.com/article/psychic-spies-warrior-monks
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00789r001001420001-3
Don't you just love all the remote viewers' descriptions of Venus and Mars, among other planets, that have been shown to be fractally bad comic book levels wrong? These morons never thought to do any double-blind controlled experiments on the Earth, yet they believed the horse apples.
https://www.coffeeordie.com/article/psychic-spies-warrior-monks
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00789r001001420001-3
Don't you just love all the remote viewers' descriptions of Venus and Mars, among other planets, that have been shown to be fractally bad comic book levels wrong? These morons never thought to do any double-blind controlled experiments on the Earth, yet they believed the horse apples.
Upvote
2
(3
/
-1)
Carlin's commandment had a greater amount of truth in it than many of the world's religions like:
"THOU SHALT KEEP THY RELIGION TO THYSELF!"
Here is the breakdown of the religious voting for Mango Mussolini, not a pretty picture:
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...r-harris/sr_24-09-09_harris-trump-religion_1/
Upvote
3
(6
/
-3)
How many are AI in here? This forum will be taken over quickly if no measures are taken,
Upvote
-17
(0
/
-17)
David Mayer
Ars Centurion
The thing is, without an extensive good faith (unintended) conversation about belief with someone, you have no way of reliably determining if your assumptions are correct.
Upvote
2
(2
/
0)
The 4 guards in Chinese imply meanings:
1 - Listen to every one.
2 - Kill with a sword.
3 - Jam and control every one with music.
1 - Listen to every one.
2 - Kill with a sword.
3 - Jam and control every one with music.
Upvote
2
(3
/
-1)
Yes, one came after the other, but not the one you’re thinking about. The Japanese pronunciation of "mu" was directly copied from Early Middle Chinese spoken during the so-called Six Dynasties era, specifically in the area around present-day Nanjing in 5th and 6th centuries. "Wu" in Mandarin is a much later evolution. As additional evidence that 無 was originally pronounced with an "m", the character is variously pronounced as "mou" in Cantonese, "mo" in Sichuanese and "mau" in Hakka.
Last edited:
Upvote
7
(7
/
0)
you actually dont know what are you talking about. you have not experienced savage soviet propaganda, so stick with democracy and dont replicate the same soviet propaganda clichees.
Upvote
-4
(1
/
-5)