Dell releases powerful, well-supported Linux Ultrabook

Status
Not open for further replies.

XTF

Ars Centurion
305
> Out of the box the laptop will just work. They also have their own PPA if you want to pull down the patches separately, either to reload the laptop or to use on a different machine.

Why haven't these patches been integrated upstream?
Is Ubuntu the only distro that'd work? What if I prefer Debian or Mint?

> The hardware is solid, but the software is the fun part.

The target audience has the software part figured out already.
 
Upvote
28 (38 / -10)
Why does it cost $1500 when it only has a 1366x768 screen? Does it have like a 512 GB SSD drive? Because anything lower than that, and the price doesn't make sense. It's like they're trying to charge a premium for a device with a *free* and open source OS.

EDIT: I see it has a 256 GB SSD drive. Great. So they ARE charging a premium for the fact that it's using a FREE operating system. And I agree that at this point a laptop like that, especially for developers, is a non-starter with that resolution. Doesn't Dell do any market prediction at all? Or do they always want to be the LAST ones to adopt something?
 
Upvote
46 (50 / -4)
XTF":2uxmj3zi said:
> Out of the box the laptop will just work. They also have their own PPA if you want to pull down the patches separately, either to reload the laptop or to use on a different machine.

Why haven't these patches been integrated upstream?
Is Ubuntu the only distro that'd work? What if I prefer Debian or Mint?

> The hardware is solid, but the software is the fun part.

The target audience has the software part figured out already.

The drivers will go upstream, they said.
 
Upvote
19 (19 / 0)
*sigh* I agree about the resolution. That's pretty sad. My X220 has the same resolution and it's not beautiful to look at it. While its not terrible, I would have loved to see a higher res to really showcase the Linux desktop.

Lee, your coverage these days makes me happy. You are officially my favorite writer on Ars. :D

XTF":2nhuje1h said:
Is Ubuntu the only distro that'd work? What if I prefer Debian or Mint?

I agree, while its great that Ubuntu ships on it, I've been driven away from Ubuntu by Dash/Unity. I recently found Mint and I'm loving it. A few niggles that aren't as smooth as I'd like, but overall I love the Cinnamon and Mate interfaces. Plus using the version based on Ubuntu means all those commands I have ingrained into my subconscious still work. ;) I would expect though this laptop and the drivers written with Canonical's help would work fairly easily with Mint.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

pokrface

Senior Technology Editor
21,531
Ars Staff
XTF":d7r59su1 said:
Why haven't these patches been integrated upstream?
Is Ubuntu the only distro that'd work? What if I prefer Debian or Mint?
According to Barton George, they're trying. Unfortunately, Canonical and Dell aren't the only entities involved. As has been the case many, many times before, the hardware vendors aren't always keen on sharing, and it's hard to convince some companies that the FOSS model works and that it won't infect them with some kind of "open source cancer" that will prevent them from making money.
 
Upvote
25 (26 / -1)
academic.sam":3227t88h said:
1366x768 .. Sigh..
Edit: We have tablets at a ridiculous 2560x1600, but this.. C'mon

Yea. I'm pretty disappointed by this too. Dell sells a laptop with a 12.5" touchscreen that's 1080p for less money too. I was sorta looking forward to this but with that screen res at $1500 it's a no go.
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)

elkoraco

Seniorius Lurkius
45
XTF":10h116cb said:
Why haven't these patches been integrated upstream?
Is Ubuntu the only distro that'd work? What if I prefer Debian or Mint?

Looking at the Launchpad description, most of the fixes are backported from the 3.6 kernel. There seems to be some code for the non-standard trackpad, but I wouldn't worry. It's mostly just Ubuntu with a few version control systems and admin tools installed.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

psarhjinian

Ars Praefectus
3,725
Subscriptor++
That screen, oh, that screen...

It's like the device was hamstrung at birth: give it good software, but slap it into a line (XPS or Inspiron) that has a short shelf life and hobble it with a low-resolution screen and sell it for more money. I can see why (those panels are cheap and it keeps costs down) but it's an unfortunate choice. You might as well opt for their 12" flip-book and hope.

It would be nicer, I think, to see a Latitude with 1920x1080 or 1200. Mind you, Dell (nor Lenovo, with the T-Series) doesn't have a high-res Latitude that isn't a 15" brick. Or get a MacBook...
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)
I mean, I can understand why the price is so high.. all that work with Canonical, developing the "Developer Tools", some pretty decent hardware, and the Dell business support is frankly awesome.. but for this price? I'm sure it's a good PC, but really $1,600 worth?

I think people typically think of PCs as expensive because of the Windows license.. it would have been nice to see that savings here, as well as a resolution greater than my 11" mini Dell laptop. A step in the right direction, I suppose?
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
D

Deleted member 330960

Guest
I can't see how this is attractive to Linux/Unix fans of which I am one.
If size, weight, and looks aren't a concern then https://www.system76.com/laptops/model/gazp8 is pretty good. Otherwise, I have a 2012 Macbook Air that I picked up for 1300 with 8 GB RAM and 1440x900. Along with http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/ I don't miss Ubuntu/Linux. You do pay the Apple tax but more importantly forgo the MS tax ;)
 
Upvote
-1 (17 / -18)
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
academic.sam":1aq6v378 said:
1366x768 .. Sigh..
Edit: We have tablets at a ridiculous 2560x1600, but this.. C'mon
Hell,there are phones with better displays nowadays too..
And to be honest for this pricetag, I'd just grab a Zenbook Prime for the 1080p display (and discrete graphics) and bite the bullet with driver support.
 
Upvote
10 (13 / -3)
satai":xfz9m9bn said:
Makes no sense.
1) Ultrabooks are not machines suitable for developers.
2) The resolution is funny.
3) Ubuntu is "I don't want Windoze and I don't know Unix distro". Majority of developers prefere Fedora, SuSE, Arch...

Dell already has a reletionship with Canonical, so that is why it is Ubuntu.

Actually, there are many server installations with Ubuntu too, so it does make some sense.
 
Upvote
15 (16 / -1)
DrDenim":37rm0vvg said:
I'll join in ranting about the pathetic screen. 1366x768, and probably TN too, for $1500?? are you serious? I know how to use an OS so don't need that crap, just give me a decent screen, and improved trackpad drivers!

Those drivers will go into the meanstream kernel, so atleast that is an improvement.
 
Upvote
6 (8 / -2)

tutubibi

Smack-Fu Master, in training
69
Not sure why so much negative comments about this ultrabook. It's solid offering and a step in the right direction.

Yes, it has screen resolution that could be higher. But this is portable machine, nobody will do any serious development on 13" screen regardless of the resolution. You would hook it up to a nice external monitor and real keyboard for serious work and have laptop for out of the office work or demos.

It is also cheaper than comparable MacBook Air with 8GB RAM and 256 GB SSD.

In terms of quality, I don't consider Dell a bad choice, pretty much every laptop and desktop machine I purchased over the last 10 years was Dell (Vostro, XPS and Optiplex lines) and never had any issues with any machine.
 
Upvote
16 (25 / -9)

donrhummy

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
183
academic.sam":2uogzchq said:
1366x768 .. Sigh..
Edit: We have tablets at a ridiculous 2560x1600, but this.. C'mon
And for such a low-res screen at that price?! $1500?!

I was excited about the possibility of moving all our developers to Linux ultrabooks (that "just work") but not at $1500 each.
 
Upvote
7 (8 / -1)

donrhummy

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
183
stevegula":3ev74zws said:
I would /seriously/ consider buying one if the resolution weren't so low, but knowing it's that I won't even bother going to Dell's website.

Does anyone other than Apple make a laptop with > 1080p resolution?

I think Asus's Zenbook Prime and Samsung's Series 9 are 1080p screens.
 
Upvote
3 (4 / -1)

hobbes13

Seniorius Lurkius
33
1366 x 768 on a 13.3 inch screen is nearly 118 pixels per inch. That makes everything tiny enough for me! I like ppi under 100 for comfortable text display.

"Developer" is a bit of a stretch. I might use a 13-inch for blog articles or configuring something over SSH, but serious work requires more and bigger windows than will usably fit on this screen.

The big news here is that Dell is trying again. The fact that the execs feel safe offering a Linux end-user machine again means the power of a certain monopolistic commercial-ware vendor is waning.

This is still not quite for me. I'll buy a 14 inch ultrabook for a lower price, eventually, or a 15.6 fatter laptop, when all the drivers are available in the distro of my choice.
 
Upvote
10 (12 / -2)
On the subject of the resolution,

I have a dell xps 15z with a 1080p screen. At 15" its almost too small to read comfortably in a desk setup. On the desk, I have a full sized keyboard and mouse and a second monitor. With it 1-2 feet away, its a bit tough to read whats on the laptop screen. Maybe I am just getting old, but 1080p on a 13" screen would be WAY too small.

The price is also way too high.
 
Upvote
-3 (3 / -6)
Status
Not open for further replies.