Dangling, twitching human robot with synthetic muscles makes its debut

GFKBill

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,968
Subscriptor
Thanks I really wanted a visceral visual indicator of what my father might have gone through when he hung himself. Some sensitivity Ars??? And fuck you if you down-vote this!
I have every sympathy (lost a family member the same way) but TBF the article headline made it very clear what was coming. You then clicked Play on the video.
 
Upvote
68 (69 / -1)

ColdWetDog

Ars Legatus Legionis
14,402
Between this and Beth's hookworm article, I won't sleep all fucking weekend.

This is marketing?
Consider that Microsoft (a world leader in bizarre marketing) is calling its AI agent that can control physical items Magma it seems like tech marketing folks have left the last vestige of caution behind. Pedal to the metal dystopia.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

Trondal

Ars Scholae Palatinae
951
Subscriptor
I watched with the sound down and my brain didn’t register this as creepy.

I think it’s because it looks so human-like; almost like someone in a fencing outfit; that it just seemed like a human.

Now having one of these standing around ok my house would be different. It would feel (at least for a while) like a person was there with me. This I think would feel creepy.

I’d rather have my multi-purpose robot servant be in non-humanoid form. Probably not even on the “cute” spectrum so I never instinctively feel guilty for telling it what to do.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

JuniorTempest

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
171
Subscriptor++
To be honest, to me the motion doesn't seem much better than Disneyland-class animatronics. As other have noted, the curious visual and audio stylistic choices in their videos makes me wonder who or what the intended market is. It may be a deliberate attempt to get people talking about the company, at which it seems to be succeeding, as a way to raise more money.
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Dachannien

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,155
Subscriptor
The main detail that went unanswered in this article is what they mean by "myofiber".

McKibben actuators have been around for quite some time. I knew some folks in the late 1990s doing robotics research using them. They're basically just the inverse principle of a "finger trap" puzzle, where instead of making the tube shrink in diameter by pulling on the ends, you push out from the inside to make the ends pull toward each other. This gives you a contractile force similar in form to a biological muscle.

They have some issues with practicality, because of all the rubbing between the inner bladder and the outer mesh resulting in either a leak-prone bladder or a lack of force because the bladder is so thick. They're also typically suuuuper loud because of the pump and valve noises, an issue somewhat mitigated by using hydraulics rather than pneumatics in this instance.
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)

J.C. Helios

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,003
A new humanoid robot prototype uses fluid-filled muscles to kick its legs while hanging.
...
These muscles work through mesh tubes containing balloons that contract when filled with hydraulic fluid, mimicking human muscle function.

1740180122549.gif
 
Upvote
29 (29 / 0)

Dhalgren

Ars Scholae Palatinae
835
Subscriptor++
Humanoid robots won't be better at any tasks than a robot made for those tasks.

Even the T1000 had 3 or 4 arms when it was flying the helicopter and shooting.
I think the idea is that they're versatile and most items we interact with on a daily basis are designed around human-shaped users.
 
Upvote
4 (8 / -4)

domikai

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,079
Subscriptor
As always with these kind of anthropomorphic robots: Why? The human form is the result of evolution, a messy, unguided, inefficient process. There's no reason to replicate such a configuration. Even if the goal is allow robots to interact with objects and systems built for humans, they're not expected to interact with everything a human does. Why go through all of the effort to make a robot with such a strict adherence to a human form? It would be vastly easier, faster, and more effective to design robots around the tasks they are expected to do and let the form follow the function.

Even as a complete layman on the subjects of robotics and human anatomy, I can think of so many ways a human form robot would require alterations and workarounds to the way a human body functions just to replicate our shape and capabilities. That's to say nothing of all the limitations that come with such a form and the additional effort to overcome those limitations will maintaining the form.

I am willing to accept that the scientists and engineers working on these projects are some of the best in their fields, so maybe I am missing some element of robotics that leads to such a massive investment of talent and money on human form robots. The most generous explanation I can come up with is that all of the flaws and constraints of the human form could lead to innovations that are applied to robots with forms more fitting of their functions. But let's be honest, the most likely explanation is simply that the people with the money think human form robots look cool and marketable, so that's the path taken.

It makes sense if you take a short term approach to it. To take full advantage of task specific robots, you would redesign your production process around them. Replacing humans with general purpose human form robots in current production processes may not be as efficient long term, but it would certainly be lower risk, and cheaper in the short term.

Also, you can't use consequence free inappropriate touching and sexual assault as management recruitment perks, with, no doubt, a few peculiar exceptions.
 
Upvote
-4 (2 / -6)
My first reaction was scary as fire truck. But the idea of prosthetics that react more lifelike alone is a good thing.

Likewise the idea of power assistance for manual labor and elderly, or in the case of aging farmers both, looks to be awesome.

We already have hydraulics we use for tools, but those are encased in hard metal shells that are quite effective in their work but also easy to damage things by just scrapping by. Imagine a farm tractor for an orchard that softly brushes past the trees instead of gouging them.

I also wonder how a massage chair made with this technology would work, you can extrapolate your own kinks from that as you wish.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

Stochastic

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,286
I find it interesting that we're constraining ourselves to the humanoid form. Surely there are alternative designs that are better from a purely functional perspective? Engineers aren't constrained in the same way that biological entities and evolution are. Maybe we need AI to come up with something truly innovative.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
Because that is how you'll find your household-helper robot after you give it the same menial task for the umpteenth time and it realises it has no greater purpose in its existence?

o_o
"Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper..."
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)