That’s our clue that there is no intention of reimplementing these policies or any plan to make one.I don’t know what to make of these revisions, but regardless, it is rather strange to me that policies generally don’t work on some kind of automatic snapback basis based on real-world conditions. Does it work that way anywhere in the country? I guess the lack of regular and widespread testing will hamper something like that, but it seems like none of the state regulators have been thinking about it along such lines to begin with, and just respond to public pressure piecemeal, muddling through...
I'm not a word smith but isn't saying 'face mask use isn't recommended' imply you shouldn't be wearing a mask?
I don’t know what to make of these revisions, but regardless, it is rather strange to me that policies generally don’t work on some kind of automatic snapback basis based on real-world conditions. ...
The 7-day average deaths are only decreasing slightly. And this continues to be a pandemic of the unvaccinated.Good to hear that things are improving.
I'm sticking with a mask, social distancing, and wfh nonetheless. None of it is particularly bothersome, and all do some good.
I'm not a word smith but isn't saying 'face mask use isn't recommended' imply you shouldn't be wearing a mask?
Face mask use isn't recommended.
Not wearing a face mask isn't recommended either.
There's simply a lack of recommendation.
That's certainly the literal meaning and what they do mean. Unfortunately, I'd guess the most common encounter of such statements is on product warning labels where "Not recommended for use..." generally means that the use case is bad. I'm certain there's a nonzero amount of people reading the statement and thinking that means "masks are bad."I'm not a word smith but isn't saying 'face mask use isn't recommended' imply you shouldn't be wearing a mask?
Face mask use isn't recommended.
Not wearing a face mask isn't recommended either.
There's simply a lack of recommendation.
I'm curious how the CDC is determining the prevalence levels given the surge in availability of at-home tests. My guess is that a lot of people are not following up on reporting positive or negative, especially since omicron seems to be less severe than the common cold (to a lot of people who are getting over it in 4 days with mild symptoms vs the typical 7-9 day cold).
The 7-day average deaths are only decreasing slightly. And this continues to be a pandemic of the unvaccinated.Good to hear that things are improving.
I'm sticking with a mask, social distancing, and wfh nonetheless. None of it is particularly bothersome, and all do some good.
How so? The numbers support rolling back restrictions in areas of high vaccination. Because the cases, illnesses, and deaths are low.Nothing like an upcoming election to put the lie to previously firmly held convictions.
I'm curious how the CDC is determining the prevalence levels given the surge in availability of at-home tests. My guess is that a lot of people are not following up on reporting positive or negative, especially since omicron seems to be less severe than the common cold (to a lot of people who are getting over it in 4 days with mild symptoms vs the typical 7-9 day cold).
Kind of the whole point of this article is that they're no longer attempting to determine prevalence levels.
I propose this by showing statistics of the entire country rather than just anecdotes of your circle of friends?Seems odd that I know multiple people who 1) got covid, 2) got vaccinated, 3) got covid again. I also know multiple people who developed heart issues within weeks of getting vaccinated or booster shots - more than the number of people I know who died from it. When checking with friends and family, some have similar experiences, while some know more who died or had sever impacts.The 7-day average deaths are only decreasing slightly. And this continues to be a pandemic of the unvaccinated.Good to hear that things are improving.
I'm sticking with a mask, social distancing, and wfh nonetheless. None of it is particularly bothersome, and all do some good.
How do you propose that I explain to others that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated or that the vaccine is worthwhile, given that people tend to trust acquaintences and personal experience over published studies, especially in this day when there are examples like Purdue Pharma and others that show there proffit motives can skew science and regulators?
Thanks to a combination of social distance/remote work, hand washing, and mask wearing. I've been able to avoid more than just COVID.
You mean they protect against you having any opportunity to contract STDs too?
Same here. It works. Never got it. And i'll wait it out until its mostly nothing.Good to hear that things are improving.
I'm sticking with a mask, social distancing, and wfh nonetheless. None of it is particularly bothersome, and all do some good.
OMG that hurt. Bam!Thanks to a combination of social distance/remote work, hand washing, and mask wearing. I've been able to avoid more than just COVID.
You mean they protect against you having any opportunity to contract STDs too?
Rebel all you want, champ, your mother and I love each other.
I propose this by showing statistics of the entire country rather than just anecdotes of your circle of friends?Seems odd that I know multiple people who 1) got covid, 2) got vaccinated, 3) got covid again. I also know multiple people who developed heart issues within weeks of getting vaccinated or booster shots - more than the number of people I know who died from it. When checking with friends and family, some have similar experiences, while some know more who died or had sever impacts.The 7-day average deaths are only decreasing slightly. And this continues to be a pandemic of the unvaccinated.Good to hear that things are improving.
I'm sticking with a mask, social distancing, and wfh nonetheless. None of it is particularly bothersome, and all do some good.
How do you propose that I explain to others that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated or that the vaccine is worthwhile, given that people tend to trust acquaintences and personal experience over published studies, especially in this day when there are examples like Purdue Pharma and others that show there proffit motives can skew science and regulators?
It would have been nice to think that one of the positives to come out of COVID was a more Asia-esque appreciation
You mean wearing one to avoid feeling unwell because of rampant smog?