The US already lags far behind China and Europe, but we're going too fast, dealers say.
See full article...
See full article...
Will haul or does haul. Because F-150s hardly ever haul anything but the driver.
I mean, yeah, if you're a trade, you should own one. But there are 3 on my little cul-de-sac, and I'm the carpenter in the neighborhood. I have the garage wood shop. I buy lumber all the time. I own a plug-in Prius and an e-bike, and I get more lumber in a month than those other owners have EVER hauled of any kind in their pickup trucks in their life. They're paying $1000/mo for their pickup, and my lumber delivery costs me $45/mo.
And F-150s have gotten so fucked up that farmers out here are desperately buying up all of the older pickups that are cheap and actually can haul stuff because they aren't putting out $60K for a goddamn pickup truck that is better at being physically imposing over all of the other vehicles than actually pulling a load of hay across a field. They'd rather have a 15 year old Ranger than a modern pickup. Suburban truck buyers are destroying a class of vehicle that actual working people need, and it's terrible.
Also helped you weren't sharing the road with a 7000lb Suburban that was barreling at you at 90MPH.What's the crumple zone of the OG Bus?
Your fucking kneecaps.
You will never build a car anything like the VW Bus ever again. Not anywhere that has any safety regulations at all.
I’m waiting for the smaller ID Buzz — but VW has no plans to ship it in North America. Just another example of why cars cost so much in the US — because everyone in the US loves “supersizing” everything. Bigger cars means higher prices.There's a dip in sales cuz every1 is waiting for the ID Buzz.![]()
Nope;Kaypro
There are cases, like California residential electricity use, but it comes with very direct and fairly aggressive regulation and price incentives. But if you leave it to markets, consumption will always increase and costs will always be externalized.I am unaware of any cases where Jevons Paradox was shown to be false. Efficiency gains always result in more resource use. This is why energy generation has to be 100% carbon free long term.
Once again, just so it is absolutely clear, we are not talking about charging at home. We're talking about apartment dwelling people who have absolutely no way to charge at home. That's the entire point of this particular sub-thread. As for "10-15 minutes" I flat out do not believe you. Prove it. I've provided video references. Go generate your own.I have an EV. I know what charging it is like. At home, it's 3 seconds to plug in and I never think about it again. On the road, when needed, it's 10-15 minutes while I take a piss and grab a snack.
I'm keeping an eye on that. With a slightly better range and/or better charging speeds at comparable cost it'd be a really good fit for me. Maybe not up to the roughest stuff I do in my crossover but hey...The Bolt is returning (2025?). The Equinox is starting to ship next year.
Odd. When I click the link, it takes me to a site that explains how to say 92 in French (quatre-vingt-douze, which translates to "four twenties and twelve").What a weird site. I don't understand the purpose of that. Is it a meta-joke? Genuinely confused... There's one about "how to say acrylic in French" and it does do that, but... Not much else? I didn't see a search bar, so it's probably not an automatic translation service.
And it will be the electric companies like this one who will be whining in a few years when homes, businesses, and neighborhoods start disconnecting from the grid. Batteries and solar continue to get cheaper and better. Car dealers won’t be the only ones to come crying to the government when their business model becomes outdated.Puget Sound Energy was the one relaying this info about capacity limits on the current service to the community.
AmericansHow is this supposed to be the dealer's fault? The government can "mandate" any number of sales they want, American's don't care. The market has spoken, if EV's ever come close to being as good as traditional gas powered cars, people might switch. Until that time, no.
I have first hand experience. I own an EV. DCFC does not take "a couple of hours" to recharge your car. It's just fucking doesn't. Plug in while you're grocery shopping and you'll be good to go by the time you get out.Once again, just so it is absolutely clear, we are not talking about charging at home. We're talking about apartment dwelling people who have absolutely no way to charge at home. That's the entire point of this particular sub-thread. As for "10-15 minutes" I flat out do not believe you. Prove it. I've provided video references. Go generate your own.
It’s definitely a result, you’re right. I was in a similar boat to your friend but truth be told it didn’t take that much mental gymnastics to convince myself. It’s an expensive car, no one’s going to buy one if they really don’t want to.That just looks like a result, not a cause.
One of my friends was recently trying to buy an EV, and was basically forced to go Tesla after waiting lists and markups at the dealerships of other EV makers.
Maybe dealer tactics are the problem.
Can you cite some examples of the “more expensive service”?The data is that EVs need less service but that service is more expensive when it is needed. So it’s really a wash for the dealers.
And yet there are plenty of things that still require service on an EV.I think the problem is that many dealers see the handwriting on the wall with regards to reduced EV service requirements and are opting to slow-walk this transition to the best of their abilities. Dealers make a lot on service, and it makes sense that they'd view a transition to a more reliable breed of vehicle as a business disaster.
In my local experience, dealers are putting less than zero effort into marketing EVs to potential customers.
edit: ninja'd by BOTH johnsonwax and thekaj, I now see. I need to go back to typing school.
Yeah that’s crazy. I’ve never been able to get through a quick bite at a food court before having to run out to move the car. And that’s when topping up to full at a destination - along the way you only need to charge enough to get to the next stop.I have first hand experience. I own an EV. DCFC does not take "a couple of hours" to recharge your car. It's just fucking doesn't. Plug in while you're grocery shopping and you'll be good to go by the time you get out.
That said, I wouldn't personally buy an EV unless I could charge where I lived or where I worked. But I don't have to lie to make it worse than it is to support that. I just think one of the biggest benefits to an EV today is that by charging it during downtime (work or sleep), you effectively spend no time refueling. Without that, it's less convenient than an ICEV. Not impossible. Not "sit on your thumbs for hours to recharge." Just less convenient.
This has nothing to do with being an EV. All cars are going this way unfortunately.Also, I want controls that are accessible for my blind wife. She shouldn't have to rely on me to adjust her air conditioning, the radio if she wants to turn the volume down, I just want a car that can work for my family and none of them do So I'm not going to buy an electric car.
I would avoid the Nissan leaf. And here’s a good video about why it’s a bad choice in the EV market and will end up costing you more in the long run.Our next car is going to be an EV for sure; I might even buy a shot-out Leaf. My wife has a 1.1 mile commute, I've got a 6 mile commute, and we're both finally at "Nah, I legit might retire from this job" spots.
But we'll have to keep an ICE around either way, for 4x a year 6-hours-each-way trips to the family. That's doable in a day, with time for a nice visit. Make that into 8 or 10 hours with multiple stops for charging, and that turns into a not-so-much.
One of the few comments on this thread that I can TOTALLY agree on.How about we repeal the laws that prevent direct car sales to consumers, and see how quickly dealerships come around then?
Rebound always occurs. Rebound such that the subsequent rate of utilization exceeds the previous rate (which is Jevon's Paradox) most certainly does not always occur. I'll just give you a single example: we don't use more firewood than ever, in the U.S., even though wood burning stoves and furnaces are more efficient than they've ever been.I am unaware of any cases where Jevons Paradox was shown to be false. Efficiency gains always result in more resource use. This is why energy generation has to be 100% carbon free long term.
GM cancelled the Bolt in favor of the Equinox, which from a quick Google search is in the same general price range. Then uncancelled the Bolt.Aren't most manufacturers selling $60K - $150K electric vehicles? They chased after the whales; GM discontinued the Chevy Bolt, their best selling EV and decided to offer more expensive vehicles. Of course demand plummeted - we call can't afford driving F150 lightnings around.
I would do the math about how much an EV pickup would cost vs. an ICE one.I need a truck for my business and I'd like to buy an electric one, but the cheapest electric truck I know if is ~$70k. This is the issue.
Heck, the easiest way to assign the credit to the dealer is to lease the vehicle. Which is a process many people already manage.No, that's not true. The way it works is that starting 2024 you can assign your credit to the dealer, who takes it off their tax due which is presumably way over $7500. The dealer then gives you a credit for $7500.
Arcane Federal budgeting rules are to blame. A non-refundable tax credit does not have to be appropriated, so it's harder to get rid of it by omitting it from the budget. A refundable tax credit where it could be a direct payment has to be put in the budget each year.
The credit still requires US sourced materials.
That connector was brilliant. You could use this cable for high speed, or a micro USB cable connected to the same port for lower speed.The ideal analogy here is this motherfucking thing. USB micro-B 3.0. If you have a device that still uses one of these you curse it every single time you have to find the single operational cable you still have for it.
View attachment 68477
Wait until all those landlords work out they can charge more for apartments that do have a charging space, though.The subsidy needs to be higher. WAY higher. Like "free truck or SUV" level of subsidies we had under Bush.
And all apartments should be required to provide an electric charging space.
The #1 obstacle I have is I only live in apartments because I can't afford a house. And since they aren't required to have a charging space...they don't have one.
Have you done the sums on whether it would be cheaper to use an EV locally and rent a car for any long distance trips you make?You may say it's due to "ignorance", but there's much more nuance to that.
Take my situation. I live in an area where the closest next city is 300km drive, and the closest place I'd call a metropolis is maybe 600km away?
An EV would not be a great choice "at the moment". Once battery tech improves not only for range, but winter driving, I'll consider buying one for sure. Until then, I cannot own an EV as my only vehicle, and I cannot afford 2 vehicles.
Such is the attitude of most capitalists when they're faced with the threat of free markets working against their favor.
Engage in shady sales practices, underpay your employees such that they quit, then act like a persecuted victim and whine to the government.
China definitely has "cheap EV's".Do Europe and China have small affordable EVs?
If the only options available in the US are overpriced luxury vehicles, it is no wonder the EVs are sitting on the lots. While I consider dealers to be unnecessary middlemen that only add to the price of a vehicle, I have a small sliver of sympathy for them, as they can't sell the types of vehicles the public wants if the manufacturers are not making those types of vehicles.
No, I’m pretty sure he’s simply saying the vast majority of EVs cost too much - for everyone. And those who think people who make $100-200K a year have infinite resources - particularly if they live on either coast - need to think again.Just checking, but are y'all trying to complain about how hard it is to buy a car making $100k+/year to someone who makes less than half that and just wants an even playing field so they have a shot at making a contribution to not spewing fossil fuel byproducts into the air?
Thanks for playing. Yes, tire particulates do matter as one factor amoung many, perhaps that was not the one i should have led with though. Completely agree rare earths are not rare, not quite clear how that is relevant to today's bingo score given Lithium is not a rare earth? But like any commodity it does takes time to scale production of by an order of magnitude. I agree there's a pretty wide range of crossover estimates out there depending on who's paying the researcher and what marginal energy mix you assume. Note I said energy crossover, not CO2 crossover. I'd point you to the Volvo anlysis at c 110k km as probably reasonably neutral. But even if you prefer a researcher arguing much earlier crossover you miss the main point, wihich is that the battery is both the most energy intensive and the most supply constrained piece of the problem. If you are playing bingo in the same universe as me, hopefully you agree we factually do not currently have enough Li in production to switch to 100% EVs overnight? If so, then the single most environmentally friendly thing you can do is put that Li into vehicles where the batteries do the most miles. As 90% of milage is the daily commute sub 100miles, that hybrids are the best place enviromentally to put the Li until the available Li supply exceeds 100% of car production x 100mile batteries. Exceptions exist for delivery drivers or people with 400mile daily commutes. Number 34 - ask for more.There it is. Bingo in one post. We had to wait until page 6 but we got "but tire particulates!!!", rare Earths are rare (they're not), the grid can't handle it (it can), a wildly inaccurate break even timeframe pulled out of their ass, crash and fire fearmongering, "batteries need replaced after 7 years" bullshit, and only rich people can afford to have a second car and then it'll never get driven (my ICEV is the car that never gets driven. The EV had more miles in less than a year than the ICEV has racked up in the last 4).
With a side of "electricity comes from coal" in there as well.
As long as you're coming back down the mountain, there shouldn't be much of a range hit. You can regen down the mountain and it takes nothing to keep the motors going.Here in the Rockies, the charging infrastructure is non-existent the second you leave city limits. I routinely make a 240 mile roundtrip so I could charge before returning, but I worry about how a mountain pass affects range, and if some chucklefuck causes an accident that blocks the highway for three hours, am I screwed? This has happened to me before in an ICE car, and it's not like you can just get off the highway and take side streets - they don't exist. You are going to sit there until the highway is cleared, however many hours it takes. Usually at least a few places along the way will have a gas pump if you run low waiting, but there's nowhere to charge between my A and Z on this trip.
Teslas arrived with COVID here, but it's all transplants and people with second vehicles.