"in certain instances relating to workplace culture, we should have done a better job ensuring our values were embraced across all parts of the company."
Meaning you didn't snuff out enough resistance to keep accusations from reaching the point of legal action?
Seriously, though, isn't that something that a CEO should be responsible for? That's the role that can dictate policy for the company as a whole. So why does Bobby Kotick still have a job in light of this massive failure that will negatively impact shareholders for years to come?
