It isn't "basically debunked", it was a greedy scam to begin with, and have been utterly disproven unnecessarily many times since.Goddamnit RFK, Jr. you're supposed to push our poorly documented and basically debunked boogeyman, not your own different poorly documented and basically debunked boogeyman, which we're quite certain doesn't cause any issues until after birth, because early in life (not in pregnancy) is totally different and we want to scaremonger about this now!
View attachment 118657
I know you are being sarcastic, but I am. And man, it is hard most days not to cry at least once.Boy, what a time to be a parent with kids who are neurodivergent and non-gender-conforming.
Why is autism seen as the most terrible of conditions to have? I know many great people who happen to be on the spectrum.
I don’t doubt that some feel bad and many have had a hard time growing up, and I wish you better, but as me “judging” other people I don’t see anything wrong with autistic people. Different on occasion, sure. Difficult sometimes, sure. A problem, no not at all.
Ah yes, USA = the world!What a time to be. The end of the world only happens once, and this is it.
The US can't recover from this. Actually, they asked for more, fully informed.
It's not hard to understand:
Tylenol isn't all that safe (people die from Tylenol caused liver damage every year).
But for years and years experts have been pointing out
- vaccines don't cause autism, and that
- the common vaccines are all far, far, far safer than Tylenol...
... Ergo, Tylenol causes autism.![]()
Ah yes, USA = the world!


Medical experiments (as in scientific process experiment, not experiment-as-in-prototype) are exceedingly difficult for a variety of reasons. Luckily this one isn't all that difficult and the experimental procedure is straightforward:You take Tylenol for an underlying reason. So maybe that reason is the problem and not the masking with Tylenol? But, ethically, you can't really force someone to NOT take Tylenol to be a control group.... right?
Well, that part was a given.Destructive sideshow intended to distract from installing entrenched enforcers into the new theocratic bureaucracy got distracted by the collapsing weight of their own pile of cards?
Not surprising, actually.
And we have lots of names for those that fail. Being almost completely unregulated, the supplement industry is so dominated by quack nostrums that "supplement" and "snake oil" should share an entry in every thesaurus.…fortunately we have a name for those welness [sic] things that have passed that barrier, we call it ..established medicine.
Did you miss that human beings are not "small forest animals"?Did you miss that acetaminophen liver toxicity is the cause of 20% of human liver transplants.
"Okay, but this better be the last one!"Folinic acid is delivered in a solution, and if that doesn't cure your autism, they have another solution ready for you!
Leeches don't cure cancer, nothing cures cancer. Cancer is sent by God to punish sinners and the non-believers and it's meant to be fatal. Do not question cancer.
I think it is worth pointing out that the acetaminophen poisonings leading to that "20%" are from acute overdoses and not from chronic exposure. And we are talking doses of like 7 -10 GRAMS for an adult. Its much lower for kids ~150 - 200 mg/kg. So for my kid that is only 4-5 extra-strengths.Yes, because if you take a lot more than you should then it’s toxic. It’s extremely safe and well tolerated when used as directed, just don’t chug the damn things like M&Ms.
How sure are we that there will be history books about this century?
Don't mind me, it's just so depressing when the idiots are in charge.
Boy, what a time to be a parent with kids who are neurodivergent and non-gender-conforming.
To elaborate on this, acetaminophen exhibits a threshold effect in terms of liver toxicity. If you consume below a certain amount, your liver is able to process it fine and suffers effectively no damage. If you consume excess amounts, the pathway is overwhelmed and serious liver damage results in short order. Do not joke around with the daily limits on the bottle.Yes, because if you take a lot more than you should then it’s toxic. It’s extremely safe and well tolerated when used as directed, just don’t chug the damn things like M&Ms.
It isn't "basically debunked", it was a greedy scam to begin with, and have been utterly disproven unnecessarily many times since.
Historians will note that we entered the second dark ages at the turn of the millennium.
Bigot AgesThe Dark Ages is already taken.
The Dark Ages II Redux? Electric Bugaloo?
North American society is interested in burning more than just learned women this time around. Diversification!
Wouldn't Johnson & Johnson (makers of Tylenol) have a cause for action with serious damages against RFKJr for even implying (a scurrilous innuendo) that Tylenol might be responsible for autism? I mean, no matter what, this is now going to hit their bottom-line as the less-gifted half of the American population stops buying Tylenol altogether.
Oh, I think we know what the next target will be.Bobby, as they call him could come out tomorrow and say all of those things they listed are now 100% banned, and they'd still have something to say, because what does the dog do after catching the car?
As long as the cause of autism remains murky, I think I can make the case linking autism to social media use. Worth a shot, isn't it?That's actually hilarious. "Don't be distracted by their fake explanation, my fake explanation is better!"
Here's a story that has nothing to do with anything except Robin Williams and how much I liked him as a kid:I watched Mrs. Doubtfire with the kids yesterday and it struck me that if that movie had been done today there would have been a media firestorm like no other. Especially about the ending.
At the end of the movie Robin Williams character that does Mrs. Doubtfire gets their own kids show as Mrs. Doubtfire.
The right wing media would have a meltdown over that ending today.
The movie made me nostalgic for the 90s in the sense that this was a high profile movie and that got greenlight and released and there was no controversy. Well it might have been, I was to young to know when it initially released. But I have never heard anyone bring up the movie in a negative way from that perspective.
There are some other things about the movie that doesn't quite feel right though.
It is the fear of having to accept that that drives the nutjobbery.Wait until these nutjobs discover the cause for their kids’ autism are the genes they passed on to them.
Chocolate can a deadly toxic to dogs so better cross that off your list. dihydrogen monoxide kiils more people each year than lighting strikes and shark attacks. Big pharma doesn't want to know this.I'm not a fan of acetaminophen. It is a liver toxin. It is so toxic that it is used to poison brown tree snakes on Pacific islands, especially Guam.
https://www.pacificislandtimes.com/...ylenol-laced-bait-on-guam-s-brown-tree-snakes
In the United States, acetaminophen accounts for more than 50% of overdose-related acute liver failures and approximately 20% of the liver transplant cases. It is not a benign drug. People who like to imbibe alcohol should really avoid taking it.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4913076/
However, the recent Swedish study should have buried the autism claim for good. Acetaminophen does not cause autism.
There is also the significant issue of the interaction when using acetaminophen (Tylenol) together with consuming alcohol -- the combination is much harder on the liver than either alone, causing smaller doses to be more harmful.To elaborate on this, acetaminophen exhibits a threshold effect in terms of liver toxicity. If you consume below a certain amount, your liver is able to process it fine and suffers effectively no damage. If you consume excess amounts, the pathway is overwhelmed and serious liver damage results in short order. Do not joke around with the daily limits on the bottle.
By comparison, ibuprofen and related NSAIDs are hard on your kidneys and GI track at any dose when taken long-term, just in a more gradual/progressive way.
Put another way, at low doses acetaminophen is safer and in overdose ibuprofen is safer. It's reductive and misleading to say "acetaminophen is very dangerous!" because it could lead somebody to take an alternative pain reliever that ultimately ends up more harmful to them, depending on their situation.
As long as the cause of autism remains murky, I think I can make the case linking autism to social media use. Worth a shot, isn't it?