Anti-Trump Instagram pic of seashells now enough to indict ex-FBI directors

That filing is a Goddamn disgrace, and I'm not even a lawyer. The lawyer behind this should be disbarred on general principle. I remember reading many of the legal filings in the 2020 election nonsense, and those at least tried to sound like legal complaints.
It isn’t clear that the lawyers can be disbarred. The DoJ is moving to preempt state bar discipline against their lawyers because outside groups have been referring too many lawyers for discipline. Supposedly, the high rate of state bar referrals was caused by weaponization, not misconduct.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)
Does Ars, by republishing the "threatening message", face the same possibility of prosecution?
In addition, by reading the ArsTechnica story, which contains the image of the "threatening message", are we readers also subject to prosecution? What if on our next walk on a beach, we were to also see a similar arrangement of seashells. Would it be a "see something, say something" situation?

Seriously though, deluging the FBI with reports of similar seashell patterns, might just point out how absurd this allegation against Comey is. Mind you, I'm not a fan of Mr. Comey. The ill timed release of Ms. Clinton's email issues may have tipped the 2016 election in 45/47s favor.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

azazel1024

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,136
Subscriptor
I know it's just a screenshot from a video, a snapshot in time which can result in all sorts of unintended expressions on people's faces... but wow do these guys look pissed.

View attachment 134003
It is a lifestyle choice. I almost feel bad for them.

Almost. Life must really suck being that angry at everything all the time. I am looking forward to the eventual prosecutions of most of these individuals. Fingers crossed.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

azazel1024

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,136
Subscriptor
Also, last night the DOJ submitted what was basically a Truth Social post as a legal filing in the ballroom case. Screenshot of the first page in the spoiler. Though arguably it's pre-spoiled.
Add in their indictment of the SPLC, which sounds like it is going to get torpedoed amazingly fast. I wonder if the judge just throws it out before even getting to jury selection.

What scares me is, how much longer will the judiciary stand as a semi-bulwark against this Stalinist crap?
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)


I regularly question myself and my actions even when the answer seems like it should be obvious because there is always a chance I've overlooked something. I wonder what it's like to just start from the premise that you're right about everything? Goes to the article. That's not something you can really do in wage labor and service job.
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes this exactly: more experienced folks assume they are just average, and less experienced people assume they are above average.

Or, to be glib: MAGA is too dumb to know how dumb they are.
 
Upvote
20 (20 / 0)

Cycledoc2210

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
186
Be aware that tech billionaires have gone bat shit crazy thinking about the power of AI and have sold their souls to the devil; our religious types are looking forward to the rapture; we have a demented idiot as President; the powers behind the government are the nutso rightists of Project 25. And the only thing standing between these crazies and America's demise (taking with it the constitution, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and the rule of law) as a democracy is the coming election.
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)

Gillian Seed

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
139
Watching the circus that is America, run by a reality-bereft clown that the majority of Americans voted for, is both saddening and frustrating. Now America and the Western World are suffering the consequences of your vote.

Did you not learn anything from his 1st term?

Most American's didn't vote for Trump. Of those who voted, only 49.8% voted for Trump.
 
Upvote
11 (15 / -4)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

MacBrave

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,464
Subscriptor++
Ken White over at the Popehat Report has a great commentary on this: https://www.popehat.com/p/the-comey...hlid=657f38babaa67d3f60ec307d70948596527e10db

On April 28, 2026, the United States Department of Justice indicted former FBI Director James Comey over a mildly sassy arrangement of seashells. The charge is preposterous and no competent or honest prosecutor would bring it. It represents a betrayal of the professional and ethical obligations of every U.S. Department of Justice attorney involved, and reflects the complete collapse of the Department’s credibility and independence in favor of a cultish and cretinous devotion to Donald Trump. .....
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

cleek

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,153
Raleigh NC recently had this ad campaign on their public garbage cans:

Screenshot 2026-04-29 080850.png

so threatening.
 
Upvote
20 (21 / -1)

fitten

Ars Legatus Legionis
55,000
Subscriptor++
Some of us are old enough to remember gun targets with Obama's picture on them... deemed "Freedom of Speech".

Florida gun shop taking heat (again) for selling gun targets using President Obama's face​


https://www.tampabay.com/news/polit...-selling-gun-targets-using-president/2279875/


And some of us are old enough to remember things like this:

Funny Joe Biden Funny Truck Tailgate Decal Sticker Wrap – Vinyl Graphic Decal Bumper Sticker​


https://www.cubebik.com/shop/kidnap...l-bumper-sticker-221116-132132-07e1e3c02e246/


So yeah... he's the biggest snowflake on the planet and his entire cult is right there with him.

Edit: just found another
1777470173689.png
 
Last edited:
Upvote
24 (25 / -1)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
75,736
Subscriptor
History will look upon this regime and wonder

WTF were you thinking, electing a felon senile clown to be president. You elect a clown, you get a clown show which is exactly what we are seeing now.

Trumpers and republicans will need to answer that call.

Trump NOT our KING!!!
Twice. Elected him twice, with a normal president in between.
 
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)
More proof of the absolute disconnect between the poor and the rich. They don't even understand the number's 86 meaning > it means taken off the menu. Trump impeached!? Sure. A threat on his life? That's a stretch around the globe. The fact that they even tried, is a direct attack on the 1st amendment, but that's nothing new for the Orangutang King Wannabe.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)
If I want to read about politics, I am not going to ArsTechnica. Stick to actual technology articles please.
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

This type of drive-by has been addressed, ignored, mocked, and problematic for the speaking up lurkers posting it for over a decade at this point.
 
Upvote
30 (30 / 0)

adamsc

Ars Praefectus
4,278
Subscriptor++
If I want to read about politics, I am not going to ArsTechnica. Stick to actual technology articles please.

The problem is that politics isn’t staying confined: this prosecution is driven by the same people and policies which are destroying the American scientific system, giving large tech companies carte blanche to abuse their users, and destabilizing the global economy.

Ars has covered politics since the late 90s for that very reason. Things have gotten worse since then as tech runs more of our lives but it’s not like there was a period where we could just see cool science news without the background of DRM, government surveillance, or the Cold War which funded an awful lot of that cool science.
 
Upvote
24 (24 / 0)

Zeppos

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,963
Subscriptor
Threatening to wipe an entire civilization off of the planet gets a pass.
Strange.
It is cool to do that. Makes you great. That is worth a few silly sacrifices today. Bunch of snowflakes can't handle that! Red pill darlings, red pill. Better stay in your caves.

(/S)

Update: now I am stuck with the song "Pretentious Moi" in my head. Ça Va?
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

AusPeter

Ars Praefectus
5,201
Subscriptor
I was just listening to an NPR segment on this lawsuit. The lawyer that NPR interviewed explained that while 86 was a term most commonly used in restaurants etc, it also has organized crime/mob implications of killing someone.

So now the lawsuit makes perfect sense. The current regime thinks of itself as a an organized crime cartel, and that Trump thinks of himself as a mob boss. So of course anyone saying 86 47 is calling for violence - because that is how the current regime would use the term.
 
Upvote
13 (14 / -1)

fitten

Ars Legatus Legionis
55,000
Subscriptor++
So now the lawsuit makes perfect sense. The current regime thinks of itself as a an organized crime cartel, and that Trump thinks of himself as a mob boss. So of course anyone saying 86 47 is calling for violence - because that is how the current regime would use the term.

That's pretty much how you can tell what they are thinking in all things... it's all projection. Whatever they claim someone else for doing, that's always how they think about whatever it is and what they would do. They whine about '86' because that's what they would mean when they said it. When they whine about "they would use that to go against political opponents" it's because that's what they'd do, etc. It's pretty easy to figure out what they are thinking that way.
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)

Tofystedeth

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,450
Subscriptor++
I was just listening to an NPR segment on this lawsuit. The lawyer that NPR interviewed explained that while 86 was a term most commonly used in restaurants etc, it also has organized crime/mob implications of killing someone.

So now the lawsuit makes perfect sense. The current regime thinks of itself as a an organized crime cartel, and that Trump thinks of himself as a mob boss. So of course anyone saying 86 47 is calling for violence - because that is how the current regime would use the term.
It is always projection.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

SouseMouse

Seniorius Lurkius
37
Subscriptor++
Clearly this was a full misreading of the message.

8+6=14
14*4=56
The common denominator in 8, 6, and 4 is 2.
2*7=14
56-14=42, the answer to life, the universe, and everything. Comey is simply a fan of the HHGTTG and a math nerd.
That's pushpins and string level. How about this?

93*92+91

And it's prime!
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
It is always projection.
If we could legally enshrine this so the conservatives were forced to confront it, it would be revolutionary in culture and politics. It would still apply to liberals but not nearly as thoroughly or transformatively as how many legal and cultural walls conservatives try to willfully ignore but would be forced to confront if they had to second guess everything they had to say as their own projection even if it was cultural theatre.

It would shatter their current voting coalition if they had to consistently, even if it built even more cultural resentment that they have toward liberals, consider legal or financial consequences to being caught projecting as a caveat to freedom of speech.

It's being yoked to that exact cultural theatre that they fear most, even more than liberalisms continuation itself, not being allowed to project anymore when telling on themselves as most human beings do when you listen to them for five minutes.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
Really wish I'd be around to read the history books in 100 years, if there are any left
The problem with history books about all this will be the superabundance of footnotes. Every sentence will need to end with a footnote, with some variation of:

"I'm serious. This really happened."
"No, really, I'm not joking"
"With all due respect to Alfred Jarry, the book you currently hold in your hands is not intended to be read as an absurdist farce."
"Similarities to the 2006 file Idiocracy are entirely coincidental."
"Yep, he really said that."
"This quotation is yet another example of herp derp--a linguistic pattern that rapidly became ubiquitous among the ruling class in the US beginning around 2016."
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)

Jim Salter

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,236
Subscriptor++
The legal foundation here is incredibly thin. You might say, wafer thin /Monty

In Watts v. United States (1969), the Supreme Court overturned the conviction of a man who literally said he wanted to put LBJ in his rifle sights, finding it was political hyperbole protected by the First Amendment. Comey posted a photo of seashells. The standard has actually gotten harder for prosecutors since Watts: the 2023 Counterman decision requires showing that a speaker subjectively understood their message would be perceived as threatening.

Also, Matt Gaetz used "86'd" to describe ousting Republican leaders. Jack Posobiec tweeted "8646" about Biden. Neither was investigated, of course.

Personally, I consider very publicly reposting Comey's pic on major social media under my own name to be a patriotic, public duty. And I did my duty today.
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)