It isn’t clear that the lawyers can be disbarred. The DoJ is moving to preempt state bar discipline against their lawyers because outside groups have been referring too many lawyers for discipline. Supposedly, the high rate of state bar referrals was caused by weaponization, not misconduct.That filing is a Goddamn disgrace, and I'm not even a lawyer. The lawyer behind this should be disbarred on general principle. I remember reading many of the legal filings in the 2020 election nonsense, and those at least tried to sound like legal complaints.
In addition, by reading the ArsTechnica story, which contains the image of the "threatening message", are we readers also subject to prosecution? What if on our next walk on a beach, we were to also see a similar arrangement of seashells. Would it be a "see something, say something" situation?Does Ars, by republishing the "threatening message", face the same possibility of prosecution?
It is a lifestyle choice. I almost feel bad for them.I know it's just a screenshot from a video, a snapshot in time which can result in all sorts of unintended expressions on people's faces... but wow do these guys look pissed.
View attachment 134003
Add in their indictment of the SPLC, which sounds like it is going to get torpedoed amazingly fast. I wonder if the judge just throws it out before even getting to jury selection.Also, last night the DOJ submitted what was basically a Truth Social post as a legal filing in the ballroom case. Screenshot of the first page in the spoiler. Though arguably it's pre-spoiled.
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes this exactly: more experienced folks assume they are just average, and less experienced people assume they are above average.…
I regularly question myself and my actions even when the answer seems like it should be obvious because there is always a chance I've overlooked something. I wonder what it's like to just start from the premise that you're right about everything? Goes to the article. That's not something you can really do in wage labor and service job.
Watching the circus that is America, run by a reality-bereft clown that the majority of Americans voted for, is both saddening and frustrating. Now America and the Western World are suffering the consequences of your vote.
Did you not learn anything from his 1st term?
I plan to make approximately 8,647 references to it this week in casual conversation.This needs to be the “67” meme, but for adults.
This number needs to start appearing EVERYWHERE.
Alternatively you could just stop reading them and spare us all your noise.If I want to read about politics, I am not going to ArsTechnica. Stick to actual technology articles please.
On April 28, 2026, the United States Department of Justice indicted former FBI Director James Comey over a mildly sassy arrangement of seashells. The charge is preposterous and no competent or honest prosecutor would bring it. It represents a betrayal of the professional and ethical obligations of every U.S. Department of Justice attorney involved, and reflects the complete collapse of the Department’s credibility and independence in favor of a cultish and cretinous devotion to Donald Trump. .....
Twice. Elected him twice, with a normal president in between.History will look upon this regime and wonder
WTF were you thinking, electing a felon senile clown to be president. You elect a clown, you get a clown show which is exactly what we are seeing now.
Trumpers and republicans will need to answer that call.
Trump NOT our KING!!!
Amazing coincidence! That's the same number as the combination on my luggage!8647
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.If I want to read about politics, I am not going to ArsTechnica. Stick to actual technology articles please.
If I want to read about politics, I am not going to ArsTechnica. Stick to actual technology articles please.
It is cool to do that. Makes you great. That is worth a few silly sacrifices today. Bunch of snowflakes can't handle that! Red pill darlings, red pill. Better stay in your caves.Threatening to wipe an entire civilization off of the planet gets a pass.
Strange.
Who wrote this? The language is so uniquely DJT, but there's no way he could have written 9 pages of anything.
So now the lawsuit makes perfect sense. The current regime thinks of itself as a an organized crime cartel, and that Trump thinks of himself as a mob boss. So of course anyone saying 86 47 is calling for violence - because that is how the current regime would use the term.
It is always projection.I was just listening to an NPR segment on this lawsuit. The lawyer that NPR interviewed explained that while 86 was a term most commonly used in restaurants etc, it also has organized crime/mob implications of killing someone.
So now the lawsuit makes perfect sense. The current regime thinks of itself as a an organized crime cartel, and that Trump thinks of himself as a mob boss. So of course anyone saying 86 47 is calling for violence - because that is how the current regime would use the term.
That's pushpins and string level. How about this?Clearly this was a full misreading of the message.
8+6=14
14*4=56
The common denominator in 8, 6, and 4 is 2.
2*7=14
56-14=42, the answer to life, the universe, and everything. Comey is simply a fan of the HHGTTG and a math nerd.
View attachment 134038yes, that is a video of a bound and gagged Joe Biden that Trump reposted.
If we could legally enshrine this so the conservatives were forced to confront it, it would be revolutionary in culture and politics. It would still apply to liberals but not nearly as thoroughly or transformatively as how many legal and cultural walls conservatives try to willfully ignore but would be forced to confront if they had to second guess everything they had to say as their own projection even if it was cultural theatre.It is always projection.
The problem with history books about all this will be the superabundance of footnotes. Every sentence will need to end with a footnote, with some variation of:Really wish I'd be around to read the history books in 100 years, if there are any left
The legal foundation here is incredibly thin. You might say, wafer thin /Monty
In Watts v. United States (1969), the Supreme Court overturned the conviction of a man who literally said he wanted to put LBJ in his rifle sights, finding it was political hyperbole protected by the First Amendment. Comey posted a photo of seashells. The standard has actually gotten harder for prosecutors since Watts: the 2023 Counterman decision requires showing that a speaker subjectively understood their message would be perceived as threatening.
Also, Matt Gaetz used "86'd" to describe ousting Republican leaders. Jack Posobiec tweeted "8646" about Biden. Neither was investigated, of course.