I cancelled a while back, due to the shit Bezos has been doing with WaPo and his general coziness with the trump admin, but it only finally lapsed the other days as it was an annual subscription.Well, locks me in on canceling my prime sub. Been buying less and less from them anyways with all the spammed knock off brands and no longer reliable "prime" delivery. Maybe do some quality control on your next billion dollar boondoggle of a show before you spend all the money.
Artificial paywall. I am quite certain they had this planned out from the outset. As a public company they have no choice if they want to drive stock value. I mean they could have skipped Melania and probably not have to raise rates.Maybe I'm getting old but I can't follow any of that. Why can't there just be two tiers: ads or no ads, and both get the highest bitrate your ISP can handle? Is it more expensive for them to push out 4K/Atmos/Vision/whatever? Or are they artificially paywalling features (e.g., BMW putting heated seats behind a subscription)?
But what will they charge for ad-free Prime Video with ads?Amazon Prime subscribers will pay $5 per month for ad-free Prime Video without ads
You can do both. You can pony up for the ad-free tier for a month, then let it drop when you've binged through whatever you find worthwhile. Just wait until near the end of the season (Clarkson's Farm typically releases weekly, for instance) so you don't have to spill over into another month. I'll probably catch that and the final season of The Boys that way, and that's pretty much all Prime offers anymore that interests me enough to part with three bucks.I rarely used Prime Video before the adpocalypse because it kept trying to hide the "included with Prime" content. Now, I never use it at all because ads are, just, no.
Unless there's a new season of Clarkson' Farm. I'll put up with some ads for that. My mute button still works.
It's probably more expensive for them to stream in 4K since they're paying something for the bandwidth, but I doubt it's anywhere near the amount they are charging customers to upgrade. It's mostly a product segmentation thing.Maybe I'm getting old but I can't follow any of that. Why can't there just be two tiers: ads or no ads, and both get the highest bitrate your ISP can handle? Is it more expensive for them to push out 4K/Atmos/Vision/whatever? Or are they artificially paywalling features (e.g., BMW putting heated seats behind a subscription)?
It's almost entirely artificial, the file sizes that would need to be streamed are larger and technically require servers with more storage. But these files already exist for the higher subscription tiers so that is a moot point. Similar with bandwidth considerations (or ISP data caps, for that matter), most limits are arbitrarily applied rather than technical.Maybe I'm getting old but I can't follow any of that. Why can't there just be two tiers: ads or no ads, and both get the highest bitrate your ISP can handle? Is it more expensive for them to push out 4K/Atmos/Vision/whatever? Or are they artificially paywalling features (e.g., BMW putting heated seats behind a subscription)?
They aren't doing as well as they were a few years back, and massive flops like the vastly expensive Rings of Power - and not-quite-so-massive-but-still-huge flops like Melania aren't helping their bottom line. Plus they've pretty much saturated their market - most anyone who's ever gonna be a Prime member already has a subscription, and that portion of their business just isn't gonna grow anymore at this point. They have to be a lot more cost-conscious now than in the past. We'll see more shenanigans like this, and far less risk-taking, going forward.It's probably more expensive for them to stream in 4K since they're paying something for the bandwidth, but I doubt it's anywhere near the amount they are charging customers to upgrade. It's mostly a product segmentation thing.
I think normal ad blockers might work against it? at least, I think I only remember seeing them on my tablet, where I've been using the app.Huh, weird, my streams don't ever have any ads.
I stopped watching direct from Prime the instant I saw the first ad. I certainly won't be paying even more for the pleasure of not watching ads.
IIRC it is a ton more expensive for the routing and bandwidth...but whether it is actually worth it or not is another matter. Not all codecs are equal and it depends on the source. Remember, Amazon needs to not only have regional mirrors, but also routing paths to get content to people everywhere and none of that is cheap.It's probably more expensive for them to stream in 4K since they're paying something for the bandwidth, but I doubt it's anywhere near the amount they are charging customers to upgrade. It's mostly a product segmentation thing.
They embed them from the same streaming servers, now.I think normal ad blockers might work against it? at least, I think I only remember seeing them on my tablet, where I've been using the app.
Do you mean like the UK's TV licence fee?<sigh> This death-by-a-thousand-cuts is exhausting. Amazon has the money...can they do us the favour of buying a few Senators or House members to pass the legislation for us to simply send these companies a portion of our income every month for nothing in return other than a shiny "Paid Up!" badge now rather than drag it out over the next few years? It seems to be the way we're headed with every change these companies make that strips away a little more here, a little more there...
Skip sports too. That's where the real money is going.Artificial paywall. I am quite certain they had this planned out from the outset. As a public company they have no choice if they want to drive stock value. I mean they could have skipped Melania and probably not have to raise rates.
“Delivering ad-free streaming with premium features requires significant investment