I wonder if the Supreme Court can/might/will throw out the lawsuit as frivolous. Perhaps it depends on how much favor Elon currently has at the royal court. The king seems to be distracted by a crusade in Persia though.In a loss, every harmful move that DOGE made could possibly be undone.
“If Plaintiffs prevail on their claim that Musk was not constitutionally appointed and therefore lacked authority to exercise the power of a principal officer, the court could vacate Musk-initiated policies or cuts that are causing Plaintiffs ongoing harm,” Chutkan wrote.
"But he said he's autistic" or whatever his groveling fanboys say to excuse his fucking heinous behaviors.Ah the Musk defense of "I'm a known douchebag, so it's not my fault that bad things happened when the executive branch gave me power with no oversight"
It is the job of Congress to take rapid action in such matters. With a non-functional and/or complicit Congress in place, it is then up to the courts, which move at the speed of...courts.Here's one reason why the US system is broken - all of these arguments were made at the time, and it has still taken the court a year to do anything about it. All the personnel and offices of those agencies are gone. A governmental system that cannot handle psychotic attacks like this is not viable. The US needs to not just remove the criminals that are currently looting it, but re-organize in a way that prevents this.
I agree the issues here are systemic and only solved with a total rebuild of the system.Here's one reason why the US system is broken - all of these arguments were made at the time, and it has still taken the court a year to do anything about it. All the personnel and offices of those agencies are gone. A governmental system that cannot handle psychotic attacks like this is not viable. The US needs to not just remove the criminals that are currently looting it, but re-organize in a way that prevents this.
Here's one reason why the US system is broken - all of these arguments were made at the time, and it has still taken the court a year to do anything about it. All the personnel and offices of those agencies are gone. A governmental system that cannot handle psychotic attacks like this is not viable. The US needs to not just remove the criminals that are currently looting it, but re-organize in a way that prevents this.
The courts move slow--because of decades of taxpayers getting what most of them claim they want: tax cuts. Government can move efficiently and quickly--but only when it has the resources to do so. No one wants to pay for it, and then they complain about getting what they claim they want.It is the job of Congress to take rapid action in such matters. With a non-functional and/or complicit Congress in place, it is then up to the courts, which move at the speed of...courts.
Sadly, I think no matter what lower court judges rule, SCOTUS will be more than happy to paper over whatever laws got broke here and say it was all within the President's authority to appoint Musk and have him do whatever he wanted to. In fact, they'll probably say the interpretation of the Appointments clause of the Constitution has been overly broad and they're narrowing it dramatically.As much as I want to be excited to see possible actual justice sometime over the next few years, I've just been disappointed too many times already.
they can absolutely refuse to hear it. it's a thing. they can't take every case, they have to pick and choose. to some degree you can gauge how a given scotus leans by which ones they take on.I wonder if the Supreme Court can/might/will throw out the lawsuit as frivolous. Perhaps it depends on how much favor Elon currently has at the royal court. The king seems to be distracted by a crusade in Persia though.
Yes, they do. And they are absolutely unable to admit it was illegal and should require prison time for all parties involved - including Agent Orange who created it to circumvent the constitutional requirement of due process.“Defendants appear to make the extraordinary argument that an individual who holds an important office and wields immense power is not subject to the Appointments Clause so long as the office was unlawfully created, and the power was unlawfully seized,” Chutkan said.
indeed.Here's one reason why the US system is broken - all of these arguments were made at the time, and it has still taken the court a year to do anything about it. All the personnel and offices of those agencies are gone. A governmental system that cannot handle psychotic attacks like this is not viable. The US needs to not just remove the criminals that are currently looting it, but re-organize in a way that prevents this.
That stood out to me the most from this article, the government saying "there isn't a law saying he can't do this so he can" which, like, most kids learn at a young age isn't how things work in practice.The legal arguments these idiots make are at the playground level of thinking. They are the dumbest people to ever be in power and the American Nazi party is the most vile party.
You can probably infer them from this paragraph:This article didn't satisfy my curiosity piqued by the sub headline about DOGE's "biggest wins". What were those, exactly?
I wish I could agree, but I don't. Any organization, big or small, assumes good will on the part of the people in charge. It couldn't function otherwise. I'm not saying the structure of the US Government doesn't need to be overhauled, but no organization can protect itself against a sociopathic narcissist, or however Trump et al should be classified, at the top. Once the US populace put Trump in charge, things were broken, and the Republican Congress is complicit because they are the group that should be stopping him, and they haven't.Here's one reason why the US system is broken - all of these arguments were made at the time, and it has still taken the court a year to do anything about it. All the personnel and offices of those agencies are gone. A governmental system that cannot handle psychotic attacks like this is not viable. The US needs to not just remove the criminals that are currently looting it, but re-organize in a way that prevents this.
But not the damage that occurred by letting that idiot(and his goons) run free.
For plaintiffs, the lawsuit is not about Musk as an individual, though
I truly hate that no matter how fake the name change is legally that the Department of War is a real thing.Of course, these are the biggest wins--you know, good things, organizations that increase the good in the world. Musk would never make cuts to the Department of Greed, the Department of Hate, the Department of Death, the Department of War, or the Department of Ignorance.
All of DOGE’s work could be undone as lawsuit against Musk proceeds
Less likely they will refuse to hear it, which would leave standing a lower court order against DOGE and Musk, and more likely they will stick it in their to-do list, postponing the hearings as long as they can possibly get away with.they can absolutely refuse to hear it. it's a thing. they can't take every case, they have to pick and choose. to some degree you can gauge how a given scotus leans by which ones they take on.