I'm curious what scenarios you think about for that calculus, because for most industrial uses the loss of precision would be catastrophic to say make a robot use a handheld drill rather than just make a drill robot, and the capital costs of reconfiguring and segregating zones/steps to intermingle safely is both known and cheaper in the long run due to the productivity gainsI disagree. I’m moderately in the humanoid robot camp because when co-working with humans, in choosing between adapting the human world for robots, or adapting robots for the current human world I prefer the latter.
But with that said there are huge areas of robot usage that would be better served by dedicated machines than how humiform devices.
Finally, I have zero trust/belief in Musk delivering on his robotic promises.
Oh no, I just imagined a room full of nazibots seig heiling and goose stepping while Musk watches on from a stageSwasticars are old and busted. Consumers will go gaga for our new line of Nazibots!
Then you can subscribe to the "knows how to do laundry" feature. The premium tier can use color vision to not put reds in with the whites.It is in no way a realistic number. He's said they'll cost around $30k. I've seen some notes about MAYBE $20k... He keeps saying he expects EVERYONE to buy these to work for them around the house or do dumb menial shit. But MANY (most?) people aren't even spending that much on their primary daily transportation, let alone a humanoid robot to do their laundry.
as of today, Tesla’s P/E stands at 197
which would be justified if.. well, there is no rationale justification apart from having just invented the anti-gravity engine, the cure for all cancers, or.. AGI i guess
the quintessential bubble, that will implode eventually. postponing the event is the reason why they awarded $ 29 billions of TSLA shares to Musk to keep him as CEO
as i often read on these pages, we live in a pretty weird timeline
And lol no "robots" will not save Tesla, just sink them further, easiest way to sink a struggling company is to become saddled with a capital intensive vanity project outside their core competency
Yesterday, BYD reported a 30 percent dropin quarterly profits, in part thanks to the Chinese government telling automakers at the start of the summer that their price war was over.
Not only that, energy consumption. How much power does a humanoid robot require?Erm... "the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year."
Bullshit.
How on earth would that be possible, unless they're going to sell for something like $99. Mobile phone sales last year were less than 2 billion, globally, so even they don't amount to billions (plural) per year.
Well clearly after I buy one and get it working on my plantation, I’ll be able to afford several more and start to develop my precious metals mines.Erm... "the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year."
Bullshit.
How on earth would that be possible, unless they're going to sell for something like $99. Mobile phone sales last year were less than 2 billion, globally, so even they don't amount to billions (plural) per year.
Everyone does... Literally everyone.Anybody else find Musk a bit ... odd?
IDK, maybe it's just me.
Nope, that was the month before last month. Last month was self-driving taxis, which are not in any way alike self-driving cars, because everyone who knows, knows there's no future in self-driving cars. Next month will be taxis driven by humanoid robots, because everyone who knows, knows there's no future in taxis that drive themselves.Wait, I thought the future of Tesla was in self-driving cars?
Or was that last month's future?
It just amazes me that there are still people who put credence in anything that Elon Musk says.
so do they start out punching trees? Can they do the full tech tree?Well clearly after I buy one and get it working on my plantation, I’ll be able to afford several more and start to develop my precious metals mines.
I’m failing to find a quote of his that mentions it specifically (way too many hits) but he has often said he finds himself a bit odd.Everyone does... Literally everyone.
You can start that way but pay to play is way quicker.so do they start out punching trees? Can they do the full tech tree?
Even there, there are limits. Musk had the "solving mass transit by running a car in an underground loop like a glorified slot-car" thing pretty much to himself, and AFAIK that remains a market of one. Having a team with some kind of cogent mission is also a required ingredient, and I'm not sure he's attracting those kinds of people anymore.Tesla and SpaceX have had some success by doing things no one else was even trying at. Tesla made it's mark when no one else was even really bothering with EVs. Falcon is successful because no one else has a reusable anything for space. Starlink is the first and only low-orbit satellite data service. The common factor seems to be that Musk did manage to identify a more or less empty market which could be entered successfully. And if you have the whole market to yourself, it's easy to be successful.
We've actually chosen to adapt the human world for robots - washing machines, dishwashers, bulldozers, piledrivers, tunnelling machines, CNC machines.I disagree. I’m moderately in the humanoid robot camp because when co-working with humans, in choosing between adapting the human world for robots, or adapting robots for the current human world I prefer the latter.
The market is controlled by big investors, who are not only riding the bubble, but encouraging it. Their goal is not fair valuation; it’s making money. What sane person actually believes Tesla istock is worth its current ~200 P/E? They’re just riding it until it collapses.It's almost as if they haven't exactly thought this through. Everybody knows the old adage about the market remaining irrational longer than you can remain solvent. But, I am really starting to wonder what precisely is going on such that these investments, that large numbers of people know are over-valued, are still appreciating (e.g., bitcoin, AI, tesla).
Paul et is controlled by big investorsKrugman cites some evidence that it's because markets don't react until it's ridiculously obvious what's going on. Still, if you believe all this crap is over-valued and that a reckoning is coming, the longer this goes on, the bigger the crash will be when the market finally does react.
There is one bright spot for Tesla, however—it sold 8,370 cars in Turkey in August
First, the EU has already hitched its automotive future to the Chinese market decades ago. They weren't complaining when for nearly a decade Volkswagen were selling more cars in China than in Europe. Even today, the Chinese market is still incredibly important for European cars.I'm still stunned that Europe is willingly screwing over their economic future to China in terms of the auto industry by allowing the product dumping that BYD is doing. I mean think about it, the subsidized dumping got so bad domestically that the CCP had to step in, let alone abroad.
And lol no "robots" will not save Tesla, just sink them further, easiest way to sink a struggling company is to become saddled with a capital intensive vanity project outside their core competency
Yes, Optimus Gen 3 is Grok-enabled.Swasticars are old and busted. Consumers will go gaga for our new line of Nazibots!
... a car manufacturer with falling sales, relative to their competition.Exactly who is still holding onto Tesla stock? Can we use their change in inertia as early-warning system for the economy?
Also, until Tesla produces a single (pre-production I’d give them) robot they’re a car manufacturer and should be valued as such.
Not the first and not the only. Iridium was the first. Famously went bankrupt pretty much the day it started, but it restructured and has been operating since (eg with the inReach). Globalstar (used by SPOT devices) is the same era.Starlink is the first and only low-orbit satellite data service
That’s why I split my comment between areas where a robot is interacting with humans and the human environment and areas where their not.I'm curious what scenarios you think about for that calculus, because for most industrial uses the loss of precision would be catastrophic to say make a robot use a handheld drill rather than just make a drill robot, and the capital costs of reconfiguring and segregating zones/steps to intermingle safely is both known and cheaper in the long run due to the productivity gains
Haven’t you seen those documentaries? Humans become batteries for the robots! /sNot only that, energy consumption. How much power does a humanoid robot require?
He'll just have to cull the unwanted human population to save energy.
Perhaps that's the plan. He can't interact with real people, his swarm is via IVF, so replace them all with robots who bow when he enters the room and do his bidding without question.
He's ill.
Fixed that for you. And it wouldn’t take years to establish a self-evident fact.If a CEO is incorrect about a prediction, that's legal. It is illegal to mislead investors. This statement will tie the legal system up for years trying to figure out if Musk is simplyhopefuldemented or just bald face lying.
The robot in my home bumps around until it randomly finds a way. I can use doors to control where it goes.That’s why I split my comment between areas where a robot is interacting with humans and the human environment and areas where their not.
As an example if you want to introduce a robot to your house. How does it go through doors? Do you add actuators to the doors that the robot can control in order to open/close them? (And have to retrofit every door in your house). Or do you build a robot that can simply use the multitude of dooknobs/handles/latches that humans have developed over millennia? (Which means at the very least humanoid hand style manipulators. )
But for the industrial environment, you’re generally building your workspaces from scratch to support a new manufacturing system. So for that it makes sense for dedicated robots.
innovation? Whats that cause musk doesn't.The average Fortune 500 company only lasts for 15-30 years.
So far, Musk has done a great job of being at the forefront of innovation, making a ton of money, moving on from a mature market to the next wave of innovation.
What does Musk know about business, right? Not like he's one of the richest people on Earth.
Depends on what the robot is doing. Does a vacuum robot need to open doors? A robot doing laundry might, but that's a pretty expensive object for a pretty mundane simple job too outside of disability scenariosThat’s why I split my comment between areas where a robot is interacting with humans and the human environment and areas where their not.
As an example if you want to introduce a robot to your house. How does it go through doors? Do you add actuators to the doors that the robot can control in order to open/close them? (And have to retrofit every door in your house). Or do you build a robot that can simply use the multitude of dooknobs/handles/latches that humans have developed over millennia? (Which means at the very least humanoid hand style manipulators. )
But for the industrial environment, you’re generally building your workspaces from scratch to support a new manufacturing system. So for that it makes sense for dedicated robots.
I see it on the individual level all the time. Usually among kids, but too often in adults.It's almost as if they haven't exactly thought this through. Everybody knows the old adage about the market remaining irrational longer than you can remain solvent. But, I am really starting to wonder what precisely is going on such that these investments, that large numbers of people know are over-valued, are still appreciating (e.g., bitcoin, AI, tesla).
Paul Krugman cites some evidence that it's because markets don't react until it's ridiculously obvious what's going on. Still, if you believe all this crap is over-valued and that a reckoning is coming, the longer this goes on, the bigger the crash will be when the market finally does react.
Just because one person says something doesn’t mean it represents anything more than that. If the same person said the opposite thing, you might have a case.Funny given how many years I've heard endless "Europe has tons of great EVs you Americans need to get with the program and buy them" only now to be told that EU domestic makers are not making quality offerings.
Do you only have a dirty floor in one room? Or on one floor of your house? Or does every segmented area of your house get it’s own roomba?Depends on what the robot is doing. Does a vacuum robot need to open doors? A robot doing laundry might, but that's a pretty expensive object for a pretty mundane simple job too outside of disability scenarios
Considering he is claiming billions of robot sales per year...If a CEO is incorrect about a prediction, that's legal. It is illegal to mislead investors. This statement will tie the legal system up for years trying to figure out if Musk is simply hopeful or just bald face lying.
Actually, the market is waiting to identify the next bubble.It's almost as if they haven't exactly thought this through. Everybody knows the old adage about the market remaining irrational longer than you can remain solvent. But, I am really starting to wonder what precisely is going on such that these investments, that large numbers of people know are over-valued, are still appreciating (e.g., bitcoin, AI, tesla).
Paul Krugman cites some evidence that it's because markets don't react until it's ridiculously obvious what's going on. Still, if you believe all this crap is over-valued and that a reckoning is coming, the longer this goes on, the bigger the crash will be when the market finally does react.