Not to mention that some adults actually care about their children, and kind of get bent out of shape when the kid spends a week at death's door. In my defense, I am simply observing this behavior; I would not want RFKJr, dope supplier to his closest younger relatives, to think that I am condoning it.the cost of having your baby in NICU on a respirator for weeks is absolutely devastating
And the melamine suppliers became organ donors; not voluntarily. Mercifully, we are not looking for that degree of accountability, but a smidge of repercussions might be optimal."—or how to prevent it"
Easy. Do what large number of PRC parents who preferred their offspring to consume as little melamine as possible – yep looks like you have arrived at the same dismal point just from the other side — buy your formula from nations who take care not to poison or otherwise harm their most valuable asset viz their children.
The quantity of formula purchased by PRC parents from AU and NZ manufacturers was prodigious. Definitely on every pre-covid PRC tourist's shopping list.
Your kids,yourtheir funeral. Unfortunately.
Slight confusion here ...Also I don't think most people realize how toxic botulism is. Like the lethal dose is so low that failing to detect it in a sample from a large vat of something wouldn't really mean much I don't think.
Typically botulism spore testing isn't needed because adult digestive systems aren't a suitable environment to grow and produce toxin. Infants on the other hand are, so any food going to infants should require botulism testing.
Interesting, though that's probably worse I would assume? Like a couple of spores would also be extremely bad? Or does it take a lot of spores to make a little of the toxin?Slight confusion here ...
We're not talking about the botulinum toxin here, which is indeed almost unimaginably toxic, but rather spores of the underlying bacterium that can produce the toxin.
See also the above by Person_Man:
Okay, sure, but this is not what you said in your original post.I didn't say it was a-okay. I'm just pointing out that when talking about outbreaks of disease in a large modern community, we generally tailor our adjectives according to a rough scale, and I felt 'devastating' was high on the scale for this case in this context, i.e. implications for public health. That's all.
Obviously very many lesser things can be devastating to individuals, and the word can also be used in contexts where the same implications are not present.
Anyway, I quibbled over the use of a word. If that implies something wrong with me, I am hardly alone in these forums.
Well, I mean, RFK doesn't believe bacteria cause illness, so this result is no surprise. If babies get botulism, they should just crawl it off. [emphasis mine]
Not really.Interesting, though that's probably worse I would assume? Like a couple of spores would also be extremely bad? Or does it take a lot of spores to make a little of the toxin?
In the case of food borne toxin the bacteria may have had a considerable time to build up a considerable amount of toxin. It commonly occurs with poorly preserved foods that are then stored for long periods. Consume enough at once and you may well die too fast to even realise you need to seek medical help.Interesting, though that's probably worse I would assume? Like a couple of spores would also be extremely bad? Or does it take a lot of spores to make a little of the toxin?
The important factor is lack of oxygen is a requirement. The spores won't grow in the presence of oxygen. This is why under processed low acid canned foods are known for it. That said, commercial canneries are well aware of this, and they instill the fear into everyone working there and there are redundant checks on everything to make sure this doesn't happen. Home canning is a far more likely source of botulism toxin.In the case of food borne toxin the bacteria may have had a considerable time to build up a considerable amount of toxin. It commonly occurs with poorly preserved foods that are then stored for long periods. Consume enough at once and you may well die too fast to even realise you need to seek medical help.
It's a cost of regulating agencies not being given the resources, mandate, and guidance to help identify risks in the supply chain, leaders of companies who see a few sick infants as a reasonable cost of business, and a public with a short span of attention.Yes. But isn’t that a consequence of our “health care” system, more than of botulism per se?
Morbid humor has been a common coping mechanism long before the current American leadership’s rise to power. It is left as an exercise for the reader to determine which era gallows humor dates from based on the name alone. If you need extra brain power to figure it out, try eating some gas station sandwiches in the hopes of contracting some good worms.I came down to make sarcastic references to the babies clearly being deficient in crossfit exercise and raw beef, but I see I've been beaten to the punchline many times over. Gotta be quick with this crowd.
(Also, how bleak are things that morbid humor is a common coping mechanism to deal with the malicious incompetence of American leadership.)
In the void, three companies at the center of the investigation are left pointing fingers at each other, with none publicly taking responsibility for the contamination.
“Even though there are several hypotheses, investigational findings could not identify the source or root cause of contamination of the powdered infant formula,” the agency concluded.
You're way over-thinking this.The worst part is that many of these parents are probably going bankrupt from medical debt, and most of the babies are probably not getting the medical care and rehab etc that they need to grow up to be productive members of society. Some company needs to be at fault so it can be sued for damages; that money is badly needed in a country without universal health care and with high unemployment. This round-robin finger pointing is like being maimed by a hit-and-run driver. The executives should be in jail: companies pay them such exorbitant packages because of the enormous responsibilities they have, right?
well actually, the US has the best healthcare in the world, if you can afford it. The rich mostly come to the US for care because they can. The best here are the best in the world. The rest can be spotty.It is infuriating we have the worst healthcare system in the civilized world. When I bring this up with my Mississippi workmates, they cry THAT'S SOCIALISM!
Choose our ER visits more thoughtfully?And in general don't go to the hospital when the new residents come in (chaos) or around holidays (because the B-team is there).
Actually the US doesn't have a healthcare system. We have health insurance which is a financial instrument. You buy it, use it and pay a deductable, and if the care is covered, the insurer will pay 80%. Damn this is just like auto insurance, or house insurance.well actually, the US has the best healthcare in the world, if you can afford it. The rich mostly come to the US for care because they can. The best here are the best in the world. The rest can be spotty.
Of course, there are good docs all over the world. But there are more of them in the US, and the ones here are also better because they see lots of patients. That's the medical virtuous cycle at work.
And in general don't go to the hospital when the new residents come in (chaos) or around holidays (because the B-team is there).
Actually the US doesn't have a healthcare system. We have health insurance which is a financial instrument. You buy it, use it and pay a deductable, and if the care is covered, the insurer will pay 80%. Damn this is just like auto insurance, or house insurance.
Well, I mean, RFK doesn't believe bacteria cause illness, so this result is no surprise. If babies get botulism, they should just crawl it off.
In a regulatory system that doesn't regulate effectively and hands out the metaphorical equivalent of a stern look when companies don't follow the watered down rules we do have, it shouldn’t be surprising in the slightest that people run to the courts when they suffer injury. Especially when their medical bills may exceed the fine handed down by the “regulator”.I can't REALLY blame them. Even the tiniest crack the facade of perfection will open them up to tremendous legal liabilities, so there is very strong incentive NOT to look hard to find mistakes, because even an internal investigation can leak. This is a huge downside of the litigious and wildly unpredictable culture in the US and the ability for courts to grant absolutely devastating fines in some cases, while not taking any meaningful action in others.
Well it's actually not insurance, it's cost sharing; it's not like auto or home insurance at all. They call it insurance because overloading the word "insurance" helps them sell it.
If you think single payer is great, WaPo just had a story about some dude in England who had penis worms for 40 years before the NIH diagnosed it. It sounds like Beth got scooped on this one.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/heal...doctor-visits-one-question-changed-everything
I have a suggestion: Let's make RFK Jr. eat this stuff, the known contaminated product, and then he can just crawl off...permanently.Well, I mean, RFK doesn't believe bacteria cause illness, so this result is no surprise. If babies get botulism, they should just crawl it off.
Sounds great to me, if it were the US it would have just stayed undiagnosed.If you think single payer is great, WaPo just had a story about some dude in England who had penis worms for 40 years before the NIH diagnosed it. It sounds like Beth got scooped on this one.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/heal...doctor-visits-one-question-changed-everything
Adults can consume botulism spores without issue. RFK Jr may act like a giant baby, but he's actually a grown man.I have a suggestion: Let's make RFK Jr. eat this stuff, the known contaminated product, and then he can just crawl off...permanently.
Or decontaminate the end product either before or after it's packaged. After is safer but probably more expensive.FWIW, my background is in canning and food processing and know a bunch about botulism. It sounds like the companies were probably doing everything they're supposed to, but the regulations need updating. Botulism spores are extremely hardy and drying alone isn't likely enough heat to inactivate them. Starting with just pasteurized milk wouldn't be good enough, but UHT milk would be. The UHT process goes well above the time/temp to inactivate the spores. Also, testing alone for spores doesn't guarantee they aren't there, it just guarantees they aren't in the test that you performed. So from my perspective, I think all the raw materials going in (If they aren't already) must go through some sort spore killing heat step and remain in a clean through packaging.
My hope is they bring in experts to look at the entire supply chain going into the formula and update requirements for each ingredient and the final mix. I'm certainly not that expert, but I know enough to see what is likely the problem.
text of the story says otherwise.If it really was introduced in the last step of the process, then there really isn’t anything that the milk provider did wrong or could do to prevent it.
Sue all of them. The law is that if any of their negligence contributed to the harm, they're all liable.I think the lawyer has the right idea: go after ByHeart. The buck stops there. If they believe that their supplier provided milk contaminated with botulism, then ByHeart can go after their supplier to recoup some of their losses, but it doesn’t let ByHeart off the hook.
I thought the most valuable asset was measured in tokens these days.Do what large number of PRC parents who preferred their offspring to consume as little melamine as possible – yep looks like you have arrived at the same dismal point just from the other side — buy your formula from nations who take care not to poison or otherwise harm their most valuable asset viz their children.
Speaking as a parent:I'm not sure I like the word "devastating" in "the devastating outbreak of botulism in babies" in that as far as I can see no babies died - and as I understand it botulism doesn't typically have major damaging sequelae for survivors (and none seem to be mentioned in the links I have seen).
That's not intended to be an argument for carelessness with infant formula - just an argument for precision with words.
and ball tanningYou left out ivermectin.
I don't think your in-group is as large as you may think it is.Mercifully, we are not looking for that degree of accountability
Sounds like an ideal case for irradiation.FWIW, my background is in canning and food processing and know a bunch about botulism. It sounds like the companies were probably doing everything they're supposed to, but the regulations need updating. Botulism spores are extremely hardy and drying alone isn't likely enough heat to inactivate them. Starting with just pasteurized milk wouldn't be good enough, but UHT milk would be. The UHT process goes well above the time/temp to inactivate the spores. Also, testing alone for spores doesn't guarantee they aren't there, it just guarantees they aren't in the test that you performed. So from my perspective, I think all the raw materials going in (If they aren't already) must go through some sort spore killing heat step and remain in a clean through packaging.
My hope is they bring in experts to look at the entire supply chain going into the formula and update requirements for each ingredient and the final mix. I'm certainly not that expert, but I know enough to see what is likely the problem.
the recent medical drama "the pitt" brings up the cost issue multiple times including some super gross stuff where the patient tried to wait it out before finally going to ER because they don't have a regular doc or can't afford their copaysCongratulations, you found one story where the healthcare system got it wrong. Now compare that to US outcomes, particularly for people who can't afford insurance.
Indeed, it would work well. But when it comes to baby food, irradiation isn't going to be perceived as safe for babies regardless of the facts. The granola crowd will freak out that the big companies are making their babies radioactive. Same reason why GMOs aren't in baby food.Sounds like an ideal case for irradiation.