FCC invokes 1960s-era policy to punish media after decades of minimal enforcement.
See full article...
See full article...
I can't tell whether you're taking a huge bong hit before you write this stuff, or if you abuse an LLM by telling it to rewrite the same ancient bog-standard screed about hypocrisy but purpler and more prolix.I must confess a certain weary amusement observing the fervent defenders of censorship here at Ars suddenly recoiling at the sting of their own venom.
Why not? In the USA, the far-right has been rebranded as the right, and the center-right has been rebranded as the left.Sorry bud, but conervatives in this country are fascists. You can't rebrand this just because you don't like it.
Seeing the constant ignorant replies of: "Europe has no free speech" and "We fund your healthcare", "knife stabbings in the UK"... on any comment section that shits on these fascists.In light of the past couple of months I notice the usual "but China, but Russia" retort lost a lot of popularity. The US now is on the path to get to the exact same place. Not irreversible but not enough people are doing enough to revert it.
While you don’t specify, that sounds like the figures for Poland. In the same period the Einsatzgruppen murdered at least 65,000 Polish (primarily Jews, socialists, intellectuals and anyone politically active) civilians. Of course its not a competition and all atrocities are atrocities whoever committed them and whatever their purported motives.the first thing communists did in my country was to kill 30 000 people in 3 months to bypass the resistance. so i dont think nazis are remotely close to what animals were communists.
They are NOT conservatives. Conservatives believe in the rule of law, in personal freedoms. The GOP has moved beyond that.
This is a brave new world.
Tell me exactly how "impartiality" works when one side is actively fascist?In the UK, the BBC is required to be impartial, as such it's really one of the few trusted news sources here. Enforcing impartiality isn't necessarily bad.
Though in this climate it does seem that this is being politically motivated, so rather than ensuring impartiality, it'll have the exact opposite effect.
The USA is way too polarised at the moment for this work. Even if it was being done in good faith, nobody would agree.
NO, they absolutely are conservatives. This is exactly what conservatives believe. They absolutely the fuck do not believe in the rule of law or personal freedoms.They are NOT conservatives. Conservatives believe in the rule of law, in personal freedoms. The GOP has moved beyond that.
This is a brave new world.
Tell me you have no idea what you're talking about without telling me you have no idea what you're talking about.I must confess a certain weary amusement observing the fervent defenders of censorship here at Ars suddenly recoiling at the sting of their own venom. I've watched you applaud every creeping advance of "content moderation," every cheering embrace of state-sanctioned "fact-checking,"
The human ability for cognitive dissonance is impressive, but Americans are the most entertaining about it. Nobody voted for Bush twice, after all.NO, they absolutely are conservatives. This is exactly what conservatives believe. They absolutely the fuck do not believe in the rule of law or personal freedoms.
I'm really sick and tired of people trying to distance conservatives from this. Conservatives voted overwhelmingly for Trump. This is conservatism. Deal with it.
My understanding is that the use of 'conservative' and 'liberal' as nouns is the result of Republican rebranding to foster division and extremism. Objective definitions of the two terms show them as adjectives for moderated or regulated behavior, and unregulated behavior. The most telling point of the blatant hypocrisy of Republicans calling themselves 'conservative' is that they do not support actual conservation or environmental protections. Seriously, how conservative is promoting industrial poisoning of our air and water and land?Sorry bud, but conervatives in this country are fascists. You can't rebrand this just because you don't like it.
Or the fact that he has brown skin. That is what really set them off.Imagine the kind of Republican reaction if Obama wrote a mildly worded editorial about Fox News being biased.
The etymology of conservative, as it relates to politics, dates to the French restoration of the Bourbon monarchy and has nothing to do with ecological conservation. It has always been a matter of conserving hierarchy, and Republicans are genuine adherents.My understanding is that the use of 'conservative' and 'liberal' as nouns is the result of Republican rebranding to foster division and extremism. Objective definitions of the two terms show them as adjectives for moderated or regulated behavior, and unregulated behavior. The most telling point of the blatant hypocrisy of Republicans calling themselves 'conservative' is that they do not support actual conservation or environmental protections. Seriously, how conservative is promoting industrial poisoning of our air and water and land?
I love how easily you conflate government censorship of media with platforms who chose to engage fact-checkers or use their own standards of content moderation. The beauty of the First Amendment and Section 230 is that it gives every platform the right to determine their own standards. Ars can have theirs; Facebook can require clickbait and rage content and Truth Social can ban truth entirely. The key factor is that people can choose to engage with those platforms or not.I must confess a certain weary amusement observing the fervent defenders of censorship here at Ars suddenly recoiling at the sting of their own venom. I've watched you applaud every creeping advance of "content moderation," every cheering embrace of state-sanctioned "fact-checking," and every bureaucratic incursion designed to suppress inconvenient voices under the sanctimonious banner of combating "misinformation." How earnestly you championed the arbiters of "truth," confident that power would always rest in benevolent hands—yours, naturally.
Whaddaya mean??? Every single thing they say about his Holiness the President and Sleepy Joe Biden is thruthy!!!So when does Fox News get investigated?
I feel like there's a distinction between conservative (with a lower case 'c') and Conservative (with a capital 'C').NO, they absolutely are conservatives. This is exactly what conservatives believe. They absolutely the fuck do not believe in the rule of law or personal freedoms.
I'm really sick and tired of people trying to distance conservatives from this. Conservatives voted overwhelmingly for Trump. This is conservatism. Deal with it.
In the run-up to Brexit, The BBC was entirely guilty of attempted 'neutrality' by repeatedly broadcasting the crazy views of xenophobes, quacks, conspiracy theorists and grifters as counterpoints to professionals, professors and experienced journalists. Thus, the words of the crazies were given the same weight of trust as the serious people. Thus, a trusted broadcaster convinced a lot of people that Brexit would be great.Being impartial is not the same as being neutral.
If one side only produces idiotic actions and statements, while the other side behaves rationally and makes decent statements, even an impatial reporting of the facts will not result neutral news coverage or "balanced reporting" as they like to call it.
Simply because the facts, idiotic vs. rational behavior, are not balanced.
This is simply an attempt to censor away news they don't like while giving the task a different name.
I think conservatism is more about conserving institutions and rejecting change. A lot of the times, those institutions align with preserving hierarchy (for example, slavery or Jim Crow). However, in this instance, the attacks are being made on institutions (courts, regulatory agencies, social programs, etc.). I would not categorize the current Republican party as small c conservative. I would categorize them as capital C Conservative.The etymology of conservative, as it relates to politics, dates to the French restoration of the Bourbon monarchy and has nothing to do with ecological conservation. It has always been a matter of conserving hierarchy, and Republicans are genuine adherents.
Edmund Burke in Reflections,The etymology of conservative, as it relates to politics, dates to the French restoration of the Bourbon monarchy and has nothing to do with ecological conservation. It has always been a matter of conserving hierarchy, and Republicans are genuine adherents.
In the UK, the BBC is required to be impartial, as such it's really one of the few trusted news sources here. Enforcing impartiality isn't necessarily bad.
This is just another part of Emperor Trumps plan. Control the media.
The one you should really be focussed on is his statement from the campaign trail that a vote for Trump meant never having to vote again. This, like his campaign statements on tariffs has to be taken at face value.
America is lost. There will be no more elections - it will be a Trump on the throne forever.
This is just splitting hairs, because the natural end state of the former is the latter.I feel like there's a distinction between conservative (with a lower case 'c') and Conservative (with a capital 'C').
The first is a political philosophy/viewpoint. The second is an increasingly authoritarian and reactionary brand or identity based on beating down everyone else.
What I genuinely wish would be the case:Truly. They are masters of contortion when it comes to inventing narratives from whole cloth and selectively applying the law when it suits their cause, and ignoring it when it does not.
Punch the gas, I say.Very dangerous road we're heading towards. Every little step makes it that much harder to avoid the move to Fascism. We ignore the little steps because they seem little but those little steps will establish a foundation that will be very hard to reverse. It's sad what has happened to the country.
The policy is tough to challenge. The rally outrageous thing in the investigation. Courts really don't have much power over federal investigations, only the outcomes of the investigations - any fines or failure to renew a license would be challenged in federal court.Carr doesn't have the authority to enforce this. Remember when the GOP took the FCC to task and declared it couldn't do things like this without congressional authority?
Can't have it both ways, GOP. The distortion policy should be challenged.