Netflix kills Basic plan, making its cheapest ad-free tier $15.49

williamyf

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,404
Lmao it always makes me laugh how the online circle jerk is always far out and away from reality.

They just added 5.9 million new users this past quarter, way above analyst prediction of about 2 million. They are guiding the same increase in the next quarter. They are upping their cash flow by $1.5 billion to $5 billion for this year due to the strike, they are spending less.

They'd be in a position to buy Paramount in the next 1-2 quarters, and they should go for it imo.
I think you are seriously underestimating the size of paramount

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramount_Global
 
Upvote
-2 (0 / -2)

nerdrage

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,974
See, I think it's exactly the opposite. Execs at Disney, Warner, and Paramount screwed up their own streaming service rollout hard. They all are losing money and their shareholders aren't in it for the long haul, so they are already pulling content off their services and looking to try to sell the rights to stream it to other players to try to recoup the massive black holes of debt they dug for themselves. Meanwhile Netflix is turning a a profit. For all of the studios streaming is a cost sink that loses them money and tangential to their core business. For Netflix streaming is their core business and development of new shows is tangential.

Netflix just needs to weather the storm of the studios all thinking they can out-Netflix Netflix. That's why they had to move into creating original content in the first place - because they could see all of the studios moving into their territory and cutting them off from the shows they needed to keep their service running. With the idiot CEOs of the studios finally waking up to realize that there is no way that they can actually make their streaming services profitable in the short term, they're waking up to needing to have someone to pay them for their shows. And Netflix is right there, ready to hand over cash in exchange for streaming rights.
Here's the problem with that plan. Let's say Disney, Warners and Paramount can't make it in streaming, which (given the death of linear TV) is a huge chunk of their business and they have to sell to a competitor. Will it be Netflix? Nope, not as long as Amazon is in the streaming business. The ability to buy a Disney or an HBO might wake Apple or Google out of their torpor.

The tech companies might end up buying Hollywood and divvying it between them but Netflix is hardly the biggest and baddest tech company out there. I see them more as prey than predator.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

HiroTheProtagonist

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,542
Subscriptor++
Ya know what, a long as they offer a monthly rate, I won't pirate their stuff. I can throw them $15.50 per year, I'll just wait till they pile up a month's worth of stuff and give them a month in my churn rotation.

Now if they ever get cute about that and demand a years' subscription to watch anything, they deserve to get pirated up the wazoo.
That's a likely state of affairs in the next decade. After looking at all the people who rotate subscriptions, they'll stop honoring monthly subs and force people onto quarterlies at rates maybe $2 less than the cost of 3 individual months in the previous plan. Then they'll wait a couple years to make it semi-annual. Then eventually, probably after some more consolidation, it'll be annual contracts, take it or leave it.
 
Upvote
7 (8 / -1)

Ushio

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,462
the original commenter said that the Netflix minnow would/should buy the paramount minnow, but the paramount minnow is much, much bigger than the netflix minnow. Hence my comment
Not based on market valuation. Netflix $224 billion and Paramount $10.7 billion.

Paramount's biggest problem is that their NFL rights cost $2.1 billion a year which is 6 months operating income.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

Ushio

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,462
It’s hard to imagine how Netflix is making money. I get weekly (which I discard) texts that my (nonexistent) Netflix account has been de=activated. (We sold our Netflix investment long ago.) /s
How is it hard? they are the largest streaming service by a considerable margin and have some of the highest average revenue per subscriber numbers in all regions.

$1.49 billion net income on just under $8.2 billion revenue for the second quarter is pretty good to.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

williamyf

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,404
Here's the problem with that plan. Let's say Disney, Warners and Paramount can't make it in streaming, which (given the death of linear TV) is a huge chunk of their business and they have to sell to a competitor. Will it be Netflix? Nope, not as long as Amazon is in the streaming business. The ability to buy a Disney or an HBO might wake Apple or Google out of their torpor.

The tech companies might end up buying Hollywood and divvying it between them but Netflix is hardly the biggest and baddest tech company out there. I see them more as prey than predator.
Amazon already made a move, and bought MGM.

Buying a second studio may be "Troublesome" from a regulatory point of view. More so given the hostility that many govts are showing to them as of late.

Having said that, if Disney (owners of ABC and ESPN) was able to buy Fox (both TV and studio, sans sports and news), anything is possible I guess...
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

Dr. McCoy

Smack-Fu Master, in training
97
...

I expect to see them to introduce an ad-supported cheaper version of the Standard Plan the next time they need to show revenue growth and try to move Standard Plan customers onto it.
The moment I see an ad in my Standard Plan is the moment I cancel my subscription ... this is not negociable.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

AceRimmer

Ars Scholae Palatinae
968
They should have allowed people to sign up for the $9.99 for a short period of time. I might have done it and they would have gotten $120 a year from me. Now I will just stick with the alternate services and only pay for Netflix two months a year.

Of course I'm sure Netflix (and every other service) is working on a plan to prevent people from service hopping...
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)

rainynight65

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,242
Subscriptor
I'm disappointed in how fast streaming services copied the exact same path as cable television. Was it really only a bit less than a decade that we had it good?
The problem is the consistent expectation of ongoing growth, year on year. It's not enough for a company, especially a publicly traded company, to be profitable - they have to keep growing. And that's just not sustainable. The market is way more fragmented than it was ten years ago, because all the big studios decided they wanted a bigger slice of the cake, and started their own streaming services. And Netflix has reached the zenith in terms of its subscriber base, now it's all about wringing more money out of those people.
 
Upvote
3 (5 / -2)

Alexstarfire

Ars Scholae Palatinae
721
It's funny, all these services keep raising prices while making the user experience worse. I don't have the time or energy to track down what show has moved to what service or if it was canceled and removed completely. There's so much garbage content to sort through the few times i do pick up the remote I often give up out of frustration. A subscription plan with commercials isn't even an option for me personally, it's either the higher plan or no subscription at all, currently it's no subscription.
Justwatch.com seems to work for anything non-anime related. Anime is very hit and miss.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

zombi3g

Ars Scholae Palatinae
711
Do you think they thought people watched the commercials during linear broadcasts?
I think there was a time when they did. Commercial breaks used to be shorter, and there weren’t so many in one program. And you couldn’t pause the TV in those days.

Personally I’d like to see a return to single sponsor programming. Like “Abbott Elementary is proudly brought to you by Sears”. Hell, even bring back the little skits stars of a program used to do as part of the paid promotion.

I’m also amazed product placement didn’t work out for daytime soap operas. That used to be the whole point of their existence.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Fuzzypiggy

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,108
Wouldn't be so bad if Netflix had a decent library but I've spend countless times scrolling and finding nothing I want to watch, going back to my DVDs and wondering why the hell I bother giving NF money in the first place! My daughter is at college so she's on the extra external member slot, once she's home from college and working she can chip in and pay or it gets cancelled as i certainly can live without it.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
Of course not, but that's not what they tell their clients.
I bloody well hope that ads work. I hope they work spectacularly.

Because if ads don't work, how can we explain the industrialized world's addiction to going into serious debt to buy so fucking much environment-killing useless throwaway shit that no one needs?

I'd rather believe that we are largely helpless slaves to evil marketing masterminds than think the entire species is made up of nothing but voluntarily psychopathic morons.
 
Upvote
-3 (3 / -6)

The Lurker Beneath

Ars Tribunus Militum
6,637
Subscriptor
Netflix’s “password sharing” restrictions made me cancel my subscription after being a customer non-stop from ~2005.

Let’s say you go on a trip and want to use a device to stream Netflix. There are now a few factors that force legit customers to have to pay to use the service away from home.

* I’ve been to a few BnB’s where the TV has a Guest Mode and allows me to sign into my services and use them without having to AirPlay or otherwise find a way to connect my own device. You will now need to pay $7.99 to make that BnB a “member” to watch the content you already pay for.

* I don’t always realize ahead of time that I’ll have time to watch content while away from home. I often have to login again because it’s so far between times where I need to use my phone/tablet for Netflix. If you do not plan ahead and login once every 30 days on every possible device you might use, then when you are away from home and haven’t checked in that device, you will have to pay $7.99 for a new “member” to use the service you already pay for.

I also have a huge gripe in that Netflix has always limited the number of simultaneous streams. The highest tier allows 4 devices to play content from the same account at the same time. There’s the limiter. That’s how you control sharing. Adding all the location bullshit was completely unnecessary.

Let’s pretend they care about your security and are concerned about people sharing passwords… Okay. Why not just let each profile have their own login that goes to the shared account? That makes a lot more sense and they essentially did this but through the $7.99/mth per member fee.

It shouldn’t matter where the streams come from as long as you’re within that limit. Why does that limit even exist any more? Maybe they’re trying to phase it out, but it’s still in their features list so… 🤷🏼‍♂️

Netflix wants to treat me like a pirate because I want to save my young adult children money by allowing them to use 1 or 2 of my available streams. So I decided that’s what I’ll be. I cancelled my subscription and I’ll find other ways to watch their content.

Like an all-you-can-eat restaurant that won't let you bring your friends along?
 
Upvote
-8 (1 / -9)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,319
Subscriptor
Downgraded just in time. The moment they cancel the 9,99$ option is the same moment I’m canceling.
Yeah. Saw a lot of identical claims regarding the demise of subscription sharing.

Meanwhile, Netflix has added 5.9 million subscribers since enforcing its ban on password sharing, against a 1 million subscriber loss the previous year.

You'll do whatever it is you do. But for the most part, this latest change will likely also be a positive for Netflix.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,319
Subscriptor
Cancelled my subscription when PW sharing was blocked. Their value proposition was paper thin already and they decided to double down on the shite.
Meanwhile, 5.9 million other people signed up for new subscriptions since PW sharing was blocked, a significant gain over the 1 million lost the previous year.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
I wonder what this will do to mobile service providers that offer the basic plan for free as a perk. I'm guessing they will downgrade this perk to the ad-supported tier.
Either Netflix allows them to keep offeringthe basic plan (the special telco plan), They move the offer to "Standard with ads" and disclose the presence of the ads in the small print, or move to a competing service. I am certain that those carriers will not swallow the price increase out of the goodness of their hearts
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Well Netflix has been faltering in terms of licenses content for a while, but recently they've had enough good stuff that it actually makes it worth subscribing (Glass Onion, Arcane, Puss in Boots:The Last Wish).

I dropped out for a long time because of the high price and low quality original content (too trashy, not enough family-friendly shows) but with the ad-supported tier I can afford it.

It is somewhat ironic that when all these "revolutionary" services finally settle down and start making a profit, they are basically broadcast TV and cable TV with you being able to choose when you watch content. And by that I mean, you either get commercials poor service you can afford or a "premium" channel with a high price.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
My perennial answer for that kind of question is Amazon.

Apple could buy everyone but they seem far too picky about what they eat.

Google seems content with YouTube and YouTube Live but that could change if something good goes up for sale.

It's hard to see how puny Netflix and the equally puny Hollywood studios can outdo/outlast the tech behemoths.
Honestly, I'd see Google as the most likely suitor. Google really doesn't have an answer to Prime Video or Apple TV+ at this point. YouTube Red didn't light the world on fire (and their best series ended up moving to Netflix), and YouTube TV is just cable TV all over again.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
Wouldn't be so bad if Netflix had a decent library but I've spend countless times scrolling and finding nothing I want to watch, going back to my DVDs and wondering why the hell I bother giving NF money in the first place! My daughter is at college so she's on the extra external member slot, once she's home from college and working she can chip in and pay or it gets cancelled as i certainly can live without it.

Part of the problem is the algorithm which kinda sucks at predicting what you want to see for a lot of people (it ignores if you like family content, retro content, indie content, and keeps trying to push you to horror, adult-content, Netflix sponsored content). The other part of the problem is there's no function to HIDE things you don't like, and your list heavily weights the last thing you added, ignoring the first things you added.

So the most recent things you watched keep cycling over and over again, and promoted content in genres you despise (I hate horror content and don't EVER want to see it even promoted) keeps being pushed in your face.

If Netflix were about serving their customers instead of self-promotion a lot of people would be a lot happier.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)