I think you are seriously underestimating the size of paramountLmao it always makes me laugh how the online circle jerk is always far out and away from reality.
They just added 5.9 million new users this past quarter, way above analyst prediction of about 2 million. They are guiding the same increase in the next quarter. They are upping their cash flow by $1.5 billion to $5 billion for this year due to the strike, they are spending less.
They'd be in a position to buy Paramount in the next 1-2 quarters, and they should go for it imo.
Here's the problem with that plan. Let's say Disney, Warners and Paramount can't make it in streaming, which (given the death of linear TV) is a huge chunk of their business and they have to sell to a competitor. Will it be Netflix? Nope, not as long as Amazon is in the streaming business. The ability to buy a Disney or an HBO might wake Apple or Google out of their torpor.See, I think it's exactly the opposite. Execs at Disney, Warner, and Paramount screwed up their own streaming service rollout hard. They all are losing money and their shareholders aren't in it for the long haul, so they are already pulling content off their services and looking to try to sell the rights to stream it to other players to try to recoup the massive black holes of debt they dug for themselves. Meanwhile Netflix is turning a a profit. For all of the studios streaming is a cost sink that loses them money and tangential to their core business. For Netflix streaming is their core business and development of new shows is tangential.
Netflix just needs to weather the storm of the studios all thinking they can out-Netflix Netflix. That's why they had to move into creating original content in the first place - because they could see all of the studios moving into their territory and cutting them off from the shows they needed to keep their service running. With the idiot CEOs of the studios finally waking up to realize that there is no way that they can actually make their streaming services profitable in the short term, they're waking up to needing to have someone to pay them for their shows. And Netflix is right there, ready to hand over cash in exchange for streaming rights.
Netflix and the Hollywood studios are all minnows. The big sharks are Amazon, Apple and Google.I think you are seriously underestimating the size of paramount
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramount_Global
That's a likely state of affairs in the next decade. After looking at all the people who rotate subscriptions, they'll stop honoring monthly subs and force people onto quarterlies at rates maybe $2 less than the cost of 3 individual months in the previous plan. Then they'll wait a couple years to make it semi-annual. Then eventually, probably after some more consolidation, it'll be annual contracts, take it or leave it.Ya know what, a long as they offer a monthly rate, I won't pirate their stuff. I can throw them $15.50 per year, I'll just wait till they pile up a month's worth of stuff and give them a month in my churn rotation.
Now if they ever get cute about that and demand a years' subscription to watch anything, they deserve to get pirated up the wazoo.
Edit: completely wrong info on my part. DisregardNetflix and the Hollywood studios are all minnows. The big sharks are Amazon, Apple and Google.
Not based on market valuation. Netflix $224 billion and Paramount $10.7 billion.the original commenter said that the Netflix minnow would/should buy the paramount minnow, but the paramount minnow is much, much bigger than the netflix minnow. Hence my comment
How is it hard? they are the largest streaming service by a considerable margin and have some of the highest average revenue per subscriber numbers in all regions.It’s hard to imagine how Netflix is making money. I get weekly (which I discard) texts that my (nonexistent) Netflix account has been de=activated. (We sold our Netflix investment long ago.) /s
Apparently, they have been gaining since cracking down on password sharing and introducing the ad-tier.Apparently Netflix has not shed enough subscribers.
I stand corrected and therefore yieldNot based on market valuation. Netflix $224 billion and Paramount $10.7 billion.
Paramount's biggest problem is that their NFL rights cost $2.1 billion a year which is 6 months operating income.
Amazon already made a move, and bought MGM.Here's the problem with that plan. Let's say Disney, Warners and Paramount can't make it in streaming, which (given the death of linear TV) is a huge chunk of their business and they have to sell to a competitor. Will it be Netflix? Nope, not as long as Amazon is in the streaming business. The ability to buy a Disney or an HBO might wake Apple or Google out of their torpor.
The tech companies might end up buying Hollywood and divvying it between them but Netflix is hardly the biggest and baddest tech company out there. I see them more as prey than predator.
The moment I see an ad in my Standard Plan is the moment I cancel my subscription ... this is not negociable....
I expect to see them to introduce an ad-supported cheaper version of the Standard Plan the next time they need to show revenue growth and try to move Standard Plan customers onto it.
Do you think they thought people watched the commercials during linear broadcasts?It’s hilarious to me that ad companies are buying into this model. Do they think people actually sit there and watch these ads?
And now have raised prices on those accepting and excusing this action.Apparently, they have been gaining since cracking down on password sharing and introducing the ad-tier.
The problem is the consistent expectation of ongoing growth, year on year. It's not enough for a company, especially a publicly traded company, to be profitable - they have to keep growing. And that's just not sustainable. The market is way more fragmented than it was ten years ago, because all the big studios decided they wanted a bigger slice of the cake, and started their own streaming services. And Netflix has reached the zenith in terms of its subscriber base, now it's all about wringing more money out of those people.I'm disappointed in how fast streaming services copied the exact same path as cable television. Was it really only a bit less than a decade that we had it good?
Justwatch.com seems to work for anything non-anime related. Anime is very hit and miss.It's funny, all these services keep raising prices while making the user experience worse. I don't have the time or energy to track down what show has moved to what service or if it was canceled and removed completely. There's so much garbage content to sort through the few times i do pick up the remote I often give up out of frustration. A subscription plan with commercials isn't even an option for me personally, it's either the higher plan or no subscription at all, currently it's no subscription.
Downgraded just in time. The moment they cancel the 9,99$ option is the same moment I’m canceling.
I think there was a time when they did. Commercial breaks used to be shorter, and there weren’t so many in one program. And you couldn’t pause the TV in those days.Do you think they thought people watched the commercials during linear broadcasts?
I'd give it longer but yeah, that is the next step.I give it 3 months until the ad based plan is $9.99. They’re set on pushing this as hard as possible and that’s the next logical step.
I bloody well hope that ads work. I hope they work spectacularly.Of course not, but that's not what they tell their clients.
Netflix has not offered anything of value for some time now.
Netflix’s “password sharing” restrictions made me cancel my subscription after being a customer non-stop from ~2005.
Let’s say you go on a trip and want to use a device to stream Netflix. There are now a few factors that force legit customers to have to pay to use the service away from home.
* I’ve been to a few BnB’s where the TV has a Guest Mode and allows me to sign into my services and use them without having to AirPlay or otherwise find a way to connect my own device. You will now need to pay $7.99 to make that BnB a “member” to watch the content you already pay for.
* I don’t always realize ahead of time that I’ll have time to watch content while away from home. I often have to login again because it’s so far between times where I need to use my phone/tablet for Netflix. If you do not plan ahead and login once every 30 days on every possible device you might use, then when you are away from home and haven’t checked in that device, you will have to pay $7.99 for a new “member” to use the service you already pay for.
I also have a huge gripe in that Netflix has always limited the number of simultaneous streams. The highest tier allows 4 devices to play content from the same account at the same time. There’s the limiter. That’s how you control sharing. Adding all the location bullshit was completely unnecessary.
Let’s pretend they care about your security and are concerned about people sharing passwords… Okay. Why not just let each profile have their own login that goes to the shared account? That makes a lot more sense and they essentially did this but through the $7.99/mth per member fee.
It shouldn’t matter where the streams come from as long as you’re within that limit. Why does that limit even exist any more? Maybe they’re trying to phase it out, but it’s still in their features list so…
Netflix wants to treat me like a pirate because I want to save my young adult children money by allowing them to use 1 or 2 of my available streams. So I decided that’s what I’ll be. I cancelled my subscription and I’ll find other ways to watch their content.
Yeah. Saw a lot of identical claims regarding the demise of subscription sharing.Downgraded just in time. The moment they cancel the 9,99$ option is the same moment I’m canceling.
Meanwhile, 5.9 million other people signed up for new subscriptions since PW sharing was blocked, a significant gain over the 1 million lost the previous year.Cancelled my subscription when PW sharing was blocked. Their value proposition was paper thin already and they decided to double down on the shite.
Like an all-you-can-eat restaurant that won't let you bring your friends along?
No, you paid for all YOU can eat... not what you and several other people can eat.Like I’ve already paid for 4 meals, but Netflix will only let me eat one unless I pay $7.99 for each of the other 3 plates I already paid for with my original purchase.
Either Netflix allows them to keep offeringthe basic plan (the special telco plan), They move the offer to "Standard with ads" and disclose the presence of the ads in the small print, or move to a competing service. I am certain that those carriers will not swallow the price increase out of the goodness of their heartsI wonder what this will do to mobile service providers that offer the basic plan for free as a perk. I'm guessing they will downgrade this perk to the ad-supported tier.
Honestly, I'd see Google as the most likely suitor. Google really doesn't have an answer to Prime Video or Apple TV+ at this point. YouTube Red didn't light the world on fire (and their best series ended up moving to Netflix), and YouTube TV is just cable TV all over again.My perennial answer for that kind of question is Amazon.
Apple could buy everyone but they seem far too picky about what they eat.
Google seems content with YouTube and YouTube Live but that could change if something good goes up for sale.
It's hard to see how puny Netflix and the equally puny Hollywood studios can outdo/outlast the tech behemoths.
Wouldn't be so bad if Netflix had a decent library but I've spend countless times scrolling and finding nothing I want to watch, going back to my DVDs and wondering why the hell I bother giving NF money in the first place! My daughter is at college so she's on the extra external member slot, once she's home from college and working she can chip in and pay or it gets cancelled as i certainly can live without it.