Tesla sued after report that workers shared invasive images from car cameras

sryan2k1

Ars Legatus Legionis
46,410
Subscriptor++
I fear this is just the start. The more we allow companies to install cloud-connected cameras into devices over which we have zero control, and absent any kind of privacy legislation, this kind of thing will keep happening over and over again.
What they're doing is probbly not illegal, in the US anyway.
 
Upvote
18 (41 / -23)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,307
Subscriptor
WHY is this data even going onto Tesla's servers in the first place?! Shouldn't anything recorded on the car's cameras be stored entirely locally? That's how my dashcam/rearview cam works!
Tesla needs to know when they have to delete/corrupt footage that might expose them to liability.
 
Upvote
52 (56 / -4)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,307
Subscriptor
They are going to totally fry for this. I hope they get a truly staggering punitive damage judgement against them. It's just so insanely obvious that you don't do what they did. The rot clearly started at the top.
Maybe. Maybe not. Privacy laws in the US are pathetically weak, and class action suits most always occur to reward the lawyers who preside over them, leaving pennies for the actual individual victims to squabble over even if the suit succeeds.
 
Upvote
56 (63 / -7)

IncorrigibleTroll

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,228
They are going to totally fry for this. I hope they get a truly staggering punitive damage judgement against them. It's just so insanely obvious that you don't do what they did. The rot clearly started at the top.

Legal penalties are unlikely. However, anyone considering purchasing a Tesla should definitely take these reports into their decision-making process.
 
Upvote
69 (71 / -2)
I fear this is just the start. The more we allow companies to install cloud-connected cameras into devices over which we have zero control, and absent any kind of privacy legislation, this kind of thing will keep happening over and over again.
completely agree, but maybe not precisely the start. getting everyone to buy, with their own money, a tracking / recording device, and habituating them to carrying it at all times over these past <15 years was a big jump start.
 
Upvote
25 (29 / -4)
They are going to totally fry for this. I hope they get a truly staggering punitive damage judgement against them. It's just so insanely obvious that you don't do what they did. The rot clearly started at the top.
No, they won't. They are an extremely large corporation, which means any financial penalties resulting from the lawsuit will be capped at a laughingly low number and be the equivalent of a slap on the wrist that they will write off. The DoJ can't go around actually punishing companies. They're "job creators".
 
Upvote
50 (57 / -7)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,307
Subscriptor
WHY is this data even going onto Tesla's servers in the first place?! Shouldn't anything recorded on the car's cameras be stored entirely locally? That's how my dashcam/rearview cam works!
I think another interesting question is: Why is this data being collected at all? It sounds like most/all of it was recorded while the car was parked and quite possibly off - in people's garages and driveways. The idea that it was somehow being collected for "training" purposes sounds like a flat-out lie. If the car's parked, there's not a whole lot you can train it to do - other than spy, I guess.
 
Upvote
155 (158 / -3)

marmelade

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,064
"Tesla uses images from car cameras to train its artificial intelligence systems and reportedly has over 1,000 workers in the team that labels videos and images. We contacted Tesla about Yeh's lawsuit and will update this article if we get a response."

1000?! Yeah, that thar AI sure is scalable and a threat to all our jobs!
 
Upvote
24 (27 / -3)
I think another interesting question is: Why is this data being collected at all? It sounds like most/all of it was recorded while the car was parked and quite possibly off - in people's garages and driveways. The idea that it was somehow being collected for "training" purposes sounds like a flat-out lie. If the car's parked, there's not a whole lot you can train it to do - other than spy, I guess.
There is only one possible case for it, and it's one my rearview camera/dashcam combo is designed for. If the car gets a shock heavy enough to trigger the display or camera's motion sensors while it is in park, it starts recording front and back for a few minutes (including audio, but that's going to be muffled by the exterior of the car since the microphone's on the inside). This helps in the event my car was struck for a hit and run.

So, while I can see a situation where something like that can come in handy, it certainly has no business doing so without the user's knowledge or at any point involving Tesla's servers. Suppose someone willingly signed up for sending in testing data however. In that case, it still has no business sending parked recordings to Tesla as you say.
 
Upvote
49 (51 / -2)

unsunder

Ars Centurion
377
Subscriptor++
Maybe. Maybe not. Privacy laws in the US are pathetically weak, and class action suits most always occur to reward the lawyers who preside over them, leaving pennies for the actual individual victims to squabble over even if the suit succeeds.

IANAL, but…

Class action lawsuit won’t be approved by a judge unless it actually benefits the class. That’s all part of the settlement. The reason class action lawsuits don’t convey that much to the members of the class is in the name itself. By definition, a class may and often does represent a lot of people, and the compensation to the class has to be divided among the members of the class.

Whatever the attorneys make is generally divided among a relatively small number of attorneys. But, they also put in the work to win the case, and typically they only do it because there is the potential for a big payoff. Otherwise, the lawsuit would never happen.
 
Upvote
52 (55 / -3)

sidran32

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,602
There is only one possible case for it, and it's one my rearview camera/dashcam combo is designed for. If the car gets a shock heavy enough to trigger the display or camera's motion sensors while it is in park, it starts recording front and back for a few minutes (including audio, but that's going to be muffled by the exterior of the car since the microphone's on the inside). This helps in the event my car was struck for a hit and run.

So, while I can see a situation where something like that can come in handy, it certainly has no business doing so without the user's knowledge or at any point involving Tesla's servers. Suppose someone willingly signed up for sending in testing data however. In that case, it still has no business sending parked recordings to Tesla as you say.
You can also stream the feeds from the cameras in real-time to your phone when it's parked and Sentry Mode is enabled. That can only work if they're cloud connected.

If I recall correctly, there's also an option to donate your camera images for the purposes of training its AI. You can opt-in/opt-out. If I'm remembering right (can't check as I'm at work and I'm not going to go out to my car to look just for the sake of an internet post), what they did was very likely a violation of the user agreement in that case.
 
Upvote
35 (35 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,436
Subscriptor
I feel like there's a weird process by which the personality of the founder comes to permeate the entire organization. Like, Apple took on Jobs' fastidiousness, obsession with detail, and idiosyncrasy, Amazon took on Bezos' obsessive optimization and suffocating ambition, Zuck's creepy, predatory blandness suffused Facebook.....and Elon's personality, which is basically that of a particularly odious, 4Chan-obsessed, socially maladroit eleven year old with no parental controls enabled on his internet browser, became that of Tesla.
 
Upvote
107 (109 / -2)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,307
Subscriptor
IANAL, but…

Class action lawsuit won’t be approved by a judge unless it actually benefits the class. That’s all part of the settlement. The reason class action lawsuits don’t convey that much to the members of the class is in the name itself. By definition, a class may and often does represent a lot of people, and the compensation to the class has to be divided among the members of the class.

Whatever the attorneys make is generally divided among a relatively small number of attorneys. But, they also put in the work to win the case, and typically they only do it because there is the potential for a big payoff. Otherwise, the lawsuit would never happen.
The word "benefits" is doing some heavy lifting there. I've been part of a few class action suits, and my benefit in all cases has never totaled more than $3; it's mostly under a buck. Now, multiply that by millions of plaintiffs and you're talking real money - for the firm handling the case - but the individual plaintiffs usually wind up with very little.
 
Upvote
22 (25 / -3)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,307
Subscriptor
You can also stream the feeds from the cameras in real-time to your phone when it's parked and Sentry Mode is enabled. That can only work if they're cloud connected.

If I recall correctly, there's also an option to donate your camera images for the purposes of training its AI. You can opt-in/opt-out. If I'm remembering right (can't check as I'm at work and I'm not going to go out to my car to look just for the sake of an internet post), what they did was very likely a violation of the user agreement in that case.
What kind of training is the car going to glean while sitting in the garage or driveway?
 
Upvote
29 (33 / -4)

marnetd

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
101
What they're doing is probbly not illegal, in the US anyway.
I doubt that. And if somehow we've allowed privacy policies, that most people don't read, to govern appropriate use to the extend that they can be used to humiliate customers or circulate child pornography, then these types of software and service "agreements" need to be more heavily regulated and restricted. I would argue that any settlement of this case that doesn't potentially bankrupt Tesla is a very strong case for heavy regulation.
 
Upvote
18 (21 / -3)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

ranthog

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,240
Question for any Tesla owners - is sharing video with Tesla opt-in? Their Privacy Notice implies so:

"...your consent for Data Sharing is required and can be controlled through the vehicle’s touchscreen at any time. Even if you choose to opt-in,...camera recordings remain anonymous and are not linked to you or your vehicle."

Opt-in muddies the privacy-violation waters a bit. It's still not 100% OK IMO, but if the owner has to go in to the settings and enable data sharing, that's better than Tesla grabbing the video without permission.

https://www.tesla.com/en_eu/legal/privacy
Another page indicating that sharing camera data is opt-in:

https://www.tesla.com/support/privacy
No user agreed to what Tesla was doing with their data.
 
Upvote
46 (50 / -4)