RealPage worked with some of the nation’s largest landlords to raise rents, says lawsuit.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
When someone’s idea or need to enrich themselves screws everyone else over in a major way. Yes, it’s LSC.Interesting. When does a 'business idea' become an 'illegal racket'? Is this another sign of 'late stage capitalism'?
When someone’s idea or need to enrich themselves screws everyone else over in a major way. Yes, it’s LSC.Interesting. When does a 'business idea' become an 'illegal racket'? Is this another sign of 'late stage capitalism'?
This one is interesting. I did a business exercise a few years ago where we had to figure out if gas stations posting their prices on the signs should count as collusion since their competitors can look and then adjust prices, and if that helps them raise prices and unofficially fix them as a group. This software reminds me of the same thing in that it's just a shortcut to looking at a bunch of price sheets.
Interesting. When does a 'business idea' become an 'illegal racket'? Is this another sign of 'late stage capitalism'?
It is an interesting concept. Indirect collusion through a third party. Collusion may not have even been the original intent, but widespread success in the landlord marketplace has made it a fact.
There is an issue with the amount of data available now. Our laws were designed to stop active collusion, necessary because there was a fog of war with imperfect information. With more perfect information and market consolidation, this is snowballing. This clearly crosses the line of current law, though. If this were a tool for property managers to use only publicly available and internal information to set prices, it would probably be legal. But with the algorithm taking in all information, public and private (price paid vs advertised for all participants), and coordinating lease periods, this is clearly violating the law.In a whole lot of industries, there is a sort of "soft cartel" anyhow. I mean, I do hope they bust this app and the landlords using it, but. . .
In most industries, there is at the minimum, all participants tracking the pricing of "the market" and raising prices accordingly.
This one is interesting. I did a business exercise a few years ago where we had to figure out if gas stations posting their prices on the signs should count as collusion since their competitors can look and then adjust prices, and if that helps them raise prices and unofficially fix them as a group. This software reminds me of the same thing in that it's just a shortcut to looking at a bunch of price sheets.
Strange how the free market always steers towards turning people into serfs. Wonder why that is.
Interesting. When does a 'business idea' become an 'illegal racket'? Is this another sign of 'late stage capitalism'?
In a whole lot of industries, there is a sort of "soft cartel" anyhow. I mean, I do hope they bust this app and the landlords using it, but. . .
In most industries, there is at the minimum, all participants tracking the pricing of "the market" and raising prices accordingly.
The company also said that landlords who use employees to manually set prices “typically” conduct phone surveys to check competitors’ rents, which the company says could result in anti-competitive behavior.
This one is interesting. I did a business exercise a few years ago where we had to figure out if gas stations posting their prices on the signs should count as collusion since their competitors can look and then adjust prices, and if that helps them raise prices and unofficially fix them as a group. This software reminds me of the same thing in that it's just a shortcut to looking at a bunch of price sheets.
Oh boy, just wait until you hear that Gas Stations have been using this exact same kind of software for a looooooong time (PriceAdvantage/Kalibrate). No need to even look out the window or adjust the prices yourself!
Things are pretty ugly in my town. With borrowing rates being so low, a couple of large investment groups from Denver borrowed a shit ton of money and basically bought up everything up here. From what I've seen, rents are up over 40% in the last 18 months, and there's nothing anybody can do because it's the same people that own everything. I wonder if something like this software gave them the idea that they could walk into the market here and clean up or if they just had the business plan or creating a monopoly.
Yep. Gas is often sold at or near cost with next to no margin. Almost a loss-leader. That's why all the stuff INSIDE the store is a buck or three more than anywhere else.This one is interesting. I did a business exercise a few years ago where we had to figure out if gas stations posting their prices on the signs should count as collusion since their competitors can look and then adjust prices, and if that helps them raise prices and unofficially fix them as a group. This software reminds me of the same thing in that it's just a shortcut to looking at a bunch of price sheets.
Oh boy, just wait until you hear that Gas Stations have been using this exact same kind of software for a looooooong time (PriceAdvantage/Kalibrate). No need to even look out the window or adjust the prices yourself!
Most stations don't have the freedom to adjust prices anyway. It's usually set by the suppliers, who quite obviously collude on it. But the stations themselves make very little on gas sales. It's all the other stuff that people come in and buy that makes them money.
Interesting. When does a 'business idea' become an 'illegal racket'? Is this another sign of 'late stage capitalism'?
It's that this 3rd party was using non-public data across _different_ landlords to help set prices. Effectively helping the landlords form a cartel to help set prices higher than they otherwise have been. Also it pushed landlords to keep some units vacant in order to help push prices higher which contributes to the housing shortage.
Basically it ended up having the big landlords collude into setting higher prices through private data sharing and artificially reducing supply so the Market couldn't actually set real supply & demand rates.
If you read further, it also kept pushing higher yearly rent raises higher than humans would have, which was influenced by all that non-public data.
If the software used public data and _only_ the individual landlords data for each landlord, that'd have been a lot different.
I can see this lawsuit having standing based on how many regular people it's screwed over.
'Nuanced' is not a word I would use for this case. More like 'clear as day' price fixing.Many commenters significantly overestimate the Federal judiciary's appetite for nuanced anti-trust/anti-competative behavior suits. The Federal judiciary is packed to the gills with former white-shoe corporate lawyers who (while not bought, per se) are mighty skeptical of claims of market rigging in anything more than cartoon handshake and briefcase of money scenarios.
There has been a 40+ year non-interference paradigm in market regulation, and Real Page's attorney's know it. Even within the FTC, many rank-and-file staff are true believers in "let the market sort it out".
In short, your thirst for justice will likely be un-slaked.
That shit-eating grin you can absolutely hear in their statements is them taunting the rest of us plebeian clowns by explaining "yes we're absolutely violating the spirit of anti-competative behavior laws, but not the current very narrow interpretation of the letter of that law. Even if a lower court judge nails us, SCOTUS is essentially the high-council of fucking over regular people, so....good luck losers."