Skip to content
ISPs want more money

EU lawmakers slam “radical proposal“ to let ISPs demand new fees from websites

New fees for websites and online applications would be a disaster, MEPs say.

Jon Brodkin | 127
A person's hand holding a roll of 50-Euro notes.
Credit: Getty Images | Alicia Llop
Credit: Getty Images | Alicia Llop
Story text

Fifty-four members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are protesting what they call a “radical proposal” to require payments from online service providers to Internet service providers.

Noting that Europe’s 2015 “Open Internet Regulation ensures that citizens are free to use whichever apps and websites they wish,” the MEPs said they have “deep concern about the European Commission’s plans to change our net neutrality legislation in the upcoming Connectivity Infrastructure Act to be proposed in autumn, without having consulted the public, technology experts, academics, civil society, or expert regulatory agencies.”

No specific proposal has been released, but “statements to the press indicate that a new provision would require payments from online service providers to broadband providers—ostensibly to fund the rollout of 5G and fiber to the home,” the MEPs wrote in the letter yesterday to the European Commission.

The letter cited a May 2 Reuters article that said, “Tech giants such as Google, Meta, and Netflix may have to bear some of the cost of Europe’s telecoms network, Europe’s digital chief Margrethe Vestager said on Monday, following EU telecoms operators’ complaints.” The MEPs’ list of references also includes two Ars Technica articles from 2012 when a similar proposal was being discussed.

Vestager reportedly said at a news conference that “there are players who generate a lot of traffic that then enables their business but who have not been contributing actually to enable that traffic. They have not been contributing to enabling the investments in the rollout of connectivity… and we are in the process of getting a thorough understanding of how could that be enabled.”

European ISPs sought payments from Big Tech

Despite claims by some that Big Tech gets a “free ride,” websites and other online service providers pay for their own Internet access and in some cases build extensive network infrastructure to carry Internet traffic part of the way to broadband users. But ISPs that deliver content directly to Internet users over the so-called “last mile” of the network have clamored for extra payments from websites to help cover their costs, in addition to the payments they already get from home and business Internet customers. In November 2021, the CEOs of 13 large European telecom companies called on tech giants to pay for a portion of the Internet service providers’ network upgrade costs.

“Large telecom companies have tried for decades to require compensation from content providers for providing access to customers, despite the fact that the telecom companies are already being paid by their own customers to provide access,” the 54 members of the 705-seat European Parliament wrote. Letting ISPs collect these payments “would reverse decades of successful Internet economics by requiring the providers of websites and applications to pay fees to ISPs that have never existed before,” and “abolish key net neutrality guarantees that Europeans fought hard for,” they wrote.

Complaining about an alleged lack of transparency, the letter said, “no one outside the Commission has been able to evaluate the announced proposal of access fees. To us it sounds very similar to ones that have been rejected many times already.”

The 2012 European proposal was ditched, and “every strong net neutrality regime has banned these fees, including in the EU, India, the US, and California,” they wrote. (US net neutrality rules were repealed, but the California ones remain in effect after judges rejected ISPs’ attempts to overturn them.)

MEPs warn against broadband monopoly power

The MEPs’ letter further argued that charging websites for access to broadband consumers would help ISPs abuse their monopolies:

Adopting a model that allows for or mandates access fees would be a disastrous return to the economic model for telephony, where telecommunications companies and countries leveraged their termination access monopolies to make communication expensive. Because phone companies had a monopoly over their customers, they could charge exorbitant prices to anyone seeking to call their customers.

Broadband providers have the same monopoly over their customers. Allowing them to charge content providers for access could cause significant harm to the Internet economy.

The MEPs also doubt such fees would improve broadband connectivity, saying that “factors such as permits or construction capacities can act as more severe barriers than lack of funding.” They urged the European Commission to take its time and open an official consultation, saying, “There is no emergency that requires action in autumn 2022.”

FCC Republican wants Big Tech to pay “fair share”

In the US, Republican Brendan Carr of the Federal Communications Commission has proposed making Big Tech pay what he calls a “fair share” into the FCC’s Universal Service Fund (USF), which gives grants to ISPs to build in unserved or underserved areas. The USF is paid for by US residents through surcharges on phone bills, and the FCC in December 2021 sought comment on how to sustain the program in a proceeding that was required by Congress. In response to the FCC inquiry, telecom industry lobby group USTelecom wrote in February that “providers of broadband-enabled services benefit significantly from [telecom companies’] investment without contributing to the construction and maintenance costs of the networks that make their services possible.”

Potential changes to the USF funding mechanism include requiring fees on broadband service in addition to phone service or Carr’s suggestion of charging Big Tech companies. USTelecom told the FCC, “Those who argue for expanding to include consumer broadband services alone without including a broader base of revenues from the broadband-enabled Internet economy are settling for an incremental, short-term fix and missing the opportunity for creating a long-term, stable foundation.”

Cable lobby group NCTA told the FCC that requiring payments from broadband providers “would almost certainly result in new passed-through fees not previously assessed on these services” and “place downward pressure on broadband demand and potentially depress adoption.” Major changes to the USF model could require action by both the FCC and Congress.

Listing image: Getty Images | Alicia Llop

Photo of Jon Brodkin
Jon Brodkin Senior IT Reporter
Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry.
127 Comments