The new bivalent COVID-19 booster spurred neutralizing antibody levels that were fourfold higher against the omicron subvariants BA.4/BA.5 in older adults than those seen after the original booster, Pfizer reported Friday.
The new data may help calm concerns about whether the updated booster is an improvement over the previous booster. But the fall booster campaign—aimed at preventing another devastating winter wave—still faces considerable challenges. For one thing, a shockingly low number of Americans are rolling up their sleeves to get the shot.
Better boost
Experts all agree that the new booster shot, like the old one, will revive waning immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and provide strong protection from severe COVID-19. But some experts have expressed skepticism about whether the updated bivalent booster—which in part targets omicron subvariants BA.4/BA.5—will offer a clinically meaningful advantage over the previous booster in preventing mild infections against the subvariant.
The new data released by Pfizer and partner BioNtech today doesn’t directly address that question—it only presents data on antibody levels, not data on whether bivalent-boosted people were less likely to get infected with SARS-CoV-2 than people given the old booster. However, a fourfold increase in neutralizing antibodies is impressive—and thought to represent a clinically meaningful difference in protection.
“Fourfold is usually the magical cutoff for a lot of us when we look at neutralization. Fourfold seems to mean something,” Florian Krammer, a vaccinologist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in Manhattan, told Stat News.
For their analysis, Pfizer and BioNTech compared antibody levels in adults older than 55 who received a fourth dose of either the new bivalent vaccine (36 participants) or the original booster vaccine (40 participants). The companies looked at antibody levels just before the booster and a month afterward. The two groups had similar, stratified blends of people who had evidence of a past SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who did not.

Loading comments...