Comcast and Time Warner Cable announced the termination of their merger agreement this morning, ending the proposed combination of the nation’s two largest cable companies. Comcast had lobbied on behalf of the merger for more than a year but faced opposition from the Department of Justice and Federal Communications Commission.
“Today, we move on. Of course, we would have liked to bring our great products to new cities, but we structured this deal so that if the government didn’t agree, we could walk away,” Comcast CEO Brian Roberts said in the company’s statement. “Comcast NBCUniversal is a unique company with strong momentum. Throughout this entire process, our employees have kept their eye on the ball and we have had fantastic operating results. I want to thank them and the employees of Time Warner Cable for their tireless efforts. I couldn’t be more proud of this company and I am truly excited for what’s next.”
The deal was structured so that Comcast would not have to pay a breakup fee to Time Warner Cable.
The end of the merger also prevents Charter’s plan to expand. Charter stood to gain customers in system swaps that were contingent on the Comcast/TWC transaction. Charter’s plan to buy Bright House Networks was also contingent on the deal being approved.
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler issued a statement saying that preventing the merger “is in the best interests of consumers. The proposed transaction would have created a company with the most broadband and video subscribers in the nation alongside the ownership of significant programming interests.”
Wheeler had not commented publicly on his opinion of the merger until now. “Today, an online video market is emerging that offers new business models and greater consumer choice,” he said. “The proposed merger would have posed an unacceptable risk to competition and innovation, including to the ability of online video providers to reach and serve consumers. I am especially proud of our close working relationship throughout the review process with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Our collaboration provided both agencies with a deeper understanding of the important issues of innovation and competition that the proposed transaction raised.”


Loading comments...