The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) warns in a new report that Internet service providers could use data caps to impose higher prices on consumers, especially in markets where ISPs face little competition. But the GAO’s recommendations to the Federal Communications Commission are already meeting resistance.
ISPs have argued that consumers could benefit from caps or “usage-based pricing,” because consumers who use small amounts of data would pay less than customers who use a lot more, similar to how the cellular market works. But there isn’t enough competition in all cities or towns to prevent ISPs from abusing data caps, the GAO wrote.
“Although few fixed Internet customers are affected by UBP [usage-based pricing] at this time, the number could grow to the extent that fixed Internet providers increase their use of UBP and data use grows,” the GAO wrote. “Providers could implement UBP in a way that benefits consumers—for example, by offering low-data, low-cost plans for customers who do not want to pay for an unlimited data plan they do not need. However, providers—especially those facing limited competition—could use UBP as a means to increase their profits which could result in UBP having negative effects, including increased prices paid by consumers, reductions in content and applications accessed by consumers, and increased threats to network security.”
The GAO pointed to a 2012 study that suggested consumers might forego automatic security updates to reduce data usage.
The cellular market generally has more competition than the home Internet market, the report said. Cell phone owners throughout the US can generally choose from four nationwide providers and some smaller carriers, but the number of options for home Internet service varies by city and town. Where there’s little competition, usage-based pricing “may not be beneficial because limited competition gives the seller greater ability to make take-it-or-leave-it offers to consumers—who may face few choices to move to other providers,” the GAO wrote. Ultimately, this could “enhance providers’ profits at the expense of consumer welfare.”
The agency recommended that the Federal Communications Commission “collaborate with fixed Internet providers to develop a voluntary code of conduct, similar to the Wireless Code of Conduct, to improve communication and understanding of data use and pricing by Internet consumers.” The FCC was also urged to track deployment of data caps on fixed Internet service and “take actions, if necessary, to protect consumer interests.”



Loading comments...