Skip to content
V2-who? never heard of it, mate.

Court rules FCC is allowed to reassign 5.9 GHz bandwidth, killing V2X

Bandwidth was set aside in 1999, but V2X has been an abject failure.

Jonathan M. Gitlin | 172
Technologists think that allowing cars to communicate with each other could eradicate traffic collisions. Credit: metamorworks/Getty Images
Technologists think that allowing cars to communicate with each other could eradicate traffic collisions. Credit: metamorworks/Getty Images
Story text

The long-running saga of V2X (vehicle to everything), a system that uses part of the wireless spectrum to allow vehicles to communicate with our road infrastructure and each other, appears to finally be over. On Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the Federal Communications Commission can go through with its plan to free up part of the spectrum previously set aside for vehicles and infrastructure to talk to each other. Instead, that bandwidth will be turned over to Wi-Fi instead.

The FCC set aside the 5.9 GHz band for V2X back in 1999. A communications protocol that vehicles could use to alert each other to dangers sounded like a great idea at the time, and the plan was to use dedicated short-range radio communication (DSRC) wireless to power the system.

Originally, the technology was meant to be fitted just to vehicles, but engineers got ambitious and decided that instead of just V2V, vehicles should be able to talk to things like traffic lights as well. This would lead us to a traffic utopia, where congestion and crashes are things of the past. There was even thought given to making pedestrians dependent on DSRC to avoid being flattened by speeding cars.

But as you might have noticed, your car almost certainly doesn’t have a DSRC modem more than 20 years after the industry decided to adopt the technology. In 2016, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would have seen DSRC-based V2X become mandatory on all new cars and trucks in the US. But the closest thing on the roads is Audi’s traffic light assist, and that uses 4G LTE, not DSRC. (And three years into the pandemic, the tech is next to useless in Washington, DC, as none of the light timings match what the cars think will happen now.)

Get real—DSRC is never going to happen

A technology like V2X only works if a substantial percentage of the vehicles on the road make use of it. But the continuing failure of automakers to actually build DSRC into their cars means there is no installed user base to benefit from the technology, even after two decades.

That ongoing failure has been evident to the FCC for many yearsIn 2020, the agency finally decided to reallocate 45 MHz from 5.850 to 5.9252 GHz. This bandwidth would be taken away from automakers and highway planners and given to Wi-Fi, which has actual users who need bandwidth.

A pair of industry trade groups, the Intelligent Transportation Society of America and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, took the FCC to court to prevent the reallocation, but as of last week, that legal challenge is over.

Predictably, ITS America and AASHTO are not pleased. “At a time when roadway deaths are at an all-time high, our efforts to preserve the entire 75 MHz spectrum for connected vehicle safety solutions demonstrate the industry’s commitment to saving lives,” the two organizations wrote in a joint statement. “Transportation safety stakeholders are overwhelmingly unified in opposition to the FCC’s ruling. We are disappointed and frustrated that the FCC and the Court disregarded our collective expertise and feedback, ignoring the importance of transportation safety and ignoring the importance of using these technologies to stop the public health emergency on our nation’s roadways. The FCC instead continued to prioritize economic interests over public safety.”

(A cynic might note that AASHTO could always tell its members to prioritize safe street and road designs as a way to prioritize public safety and reduce road deaths.)

The FCC, on the other hand, is happy with the outcome. “I am pleased with the Court’s decision, which upholds the FCC’s broad authority to manage the nation’s airwaves in the public interest,” said FCC Chairperson Jessica Rosenworcel in a statement. “In the more than two decades since the FCC allocated the 5.9 GHz band to support automobile safety, autonomous and connected vehicles have largely moved beyond dedicated, short-range communications technologies to newer, market-driven alternatives. Today’s decision recognizes that by allowing this spectrum to evolve, we can advance newer safety technologies and grow our wireless economy.”

The zombie tech that will never die?

A system that allows cars to talk to each other through potentially insecure communications protocols could certainly be problematic. But it might still be too early to completely count the idea out. Several years ago, Qualcomm debuted a new C-V2X chipset that uses cellular instead of direct radio communications between vehicles. ITS America and AASHTO are still hoping this will provide a technofix that could reduce the ever-growing death toll on US roads.

“Despite this disappointing ruling, we will continue our efforts to ensure the remaining 30 MHz is free from dangerous interference and advances transportation safety,” the two organizations wrote. “In addition, ITS America’s Future of V2X Working Group has been working actively for months to determine strategies to effectively deploy lifesaving Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) technologies under a new paradigm. AASHTO has also been working with its members to further the readiness, deployment, and integration of V2X technologies on public roadways. Connected vehicle technology and automated transportation solutions will continue to be critical tools to assist the transportation industry in achieving our goal to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all.”

Perhaps we’d be better served if cities and states started redesigning our roads so they aren’t quite as dangerous. After all, that would actually benefit all road users.

Listing image: metamorworks/Getty Images

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin
Jonathan M. Gitlin Automotive Editor
Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica's automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.
172 Comments