Skip to content
HDR

New HDR10+ Advanced standard will try to fix the soap opera effect

Can more creator control fix motion smoothing?

Scharon Harding | 191
A scene from Mission: Impossible - Fallout
A scene from Mission: Impossible - Fallout, which director Christopher McQuarrie and star Tom Cruise urged fans to view with motion smoothing off. Credit: Paramount Pictures/YouTube
A scene from Mission: Impossible - Fallout, which director Christopher McQuarrie and star Tom Cruise urged fans to view with motion smoothing off. Credit: Paramount Pictures/YouTube
Story text

Motion smoothing has a bad reputation among most cinephiles, as well as many home theater enthusiasts and content creators. Also known as motion or video interpolation, motion smoothing is available in virtually every modern TV today. It’s supposed to remove judder from films and TV shows that are shot with 24p (24 frames per second) or 25p film and displayed on 60Hz or 120Hz TVs. But motion smoothing often results in the dreaded soap opera effect and unwanted visual artifacts.

Two upcoming HDR standards, HDR10+ Advanced and Dolby Vision 2, are looking to change how we perceive motion smoothing and more closely align motion interpolation with a creator’s vision. However, it’s unclear if these standards can pull that off.

HDR10+ Advanced’s Intelligent FRC

Today, Samsung provided details about the next version of the HDR10 format, which introduces six new features. Among HDR10+ Advanced’s most interesting features is HDR10+ Intelligent FRC (frame rate conversion), which is supposed to improve motion smoothing.

A TV using motion smoothing analyzes each video frame and tries to determine what additional frames would look like if the video were playing at a frame rate that matched the TV’s refresh rate. The TV then inserts those frames into the video. A 60Hz TV with motion smoothing on, for example, would attempt to remove judder from a 24p film by inserting frames so that the video plays as if it were shot at 60p. For some, this appears normal and can make motion, especially camera panning or zooming, look smoother. However, others will report movies and shows that look more like soap operas, or as if they were shot on higher-speed video cameras instead of film cameras. Critics, including some big names in Hollywood, argue that motion smoothing looks unnatural and deviates from the creator’s intended vision.

Intelligent FRC takes a more nuanced approach to motion smoothing by letting content creators dictate the level of motion smoothing used in each scene, Forbes reported. The feature is also designed to adjust the strength of motion interpolation based on ambient lighting.

Dolby Vision 2’s Authentic Motion

HDR10+ Advanced’s Intelligent FRC sounds awfully similar to the Authentic Motion feature that Dolby announced for its upcoming HDR standard, Dolby Vision 2, in September.

Dolby’s announcement described Authentic Motion as “the world’s first creative driven motion control tool to make scenes feel more authentically cinematic without unwanted judder on a shot-by-shot basis.” Authentic Motion will be available on TVs that adopt Dolby Vision 2’s most advanced tier, which is called Dolby Vision 2 Max, and will target high-end TVs.

TechRadar reported in September that Authentic Motion will have 10 levels of motion smoothing, citing a demo of the feature applied to a scene from the Amazon Prime Video series Paris Has Fallen, which was shot at 25p. In the demo, the video reportedly went from level 5 motion smoothing during a tracking shot to level 3 when “the camera switched to tilting down gently,” to level 1 “as the camera settled,” and then level 0 “when the still camera watched the woman talk.”

Will this work?

We don’t have sufficient information about either HDR standard to be convinced yet that the technologies will improve the appearance of videos using motion smoothing, especially to viewers who are already put off by motion smoothing.

Giving creators greater control over when exactly motion smoothing is implemented and how strong it is could mean that the soap opera effect isn’t applied to scenes unnecessarily. But neither standard has proven that motion smoothing will look natural when applied at different scales to specific shots.

Neither standard has mentioned addressing the visual artifacts associated with motion smoothing, such as halos. Artifacts appear when a TV struggles to determine how the frame in between two very different-looking frames should appear. Having creators set per-scene motion smoothing levels doesn’t directly address that problem in an obvious way.

Samsung showed some publications a “simulation” of what it would like HDR10+ Advanced’s Intelligent FRC to look like, but a simulation is far different from the technology running in real time on a supported TV. If you’re curious, though, you can see images of the simulations from Forbes and Trusted Reviews.

Another question will be adoption and availability, not just by TV makers, but by creators. HDR10+ was announced in 2017 and is supported by 500 movies and 16 streaming services, per Forbes. Dolby Vision came out in 2014, and in 2020, Dolby said that 900 movie titles support the format [PDF]. We don’t know how much more of a burden that mastering content for HDR10+ Advanced or Dolby Vision 2’s motion smoothing features could put on content creators compared to today’s HDR standards.

HDR10+ Advanced is supposed to debut on Samsung’s 2026 TVs and be supported by Prime Video. Dolby Vision 2 HDR doesn’t have a release date yet.

With many TVs having motion smoothing enabled by default, improvements to the technology’s performance could enhance the viewing experience for a large audience. But both upcoming HDR standards have a long way to go to make motion smoothing look natural and to win over some of the biggest names in cinema.

Photo of Scharon Harding
Scharon Harding Senior Technology Reporter
Scharon is a Senior Technology Reporter at Ars Technica writing news, reviews, and analysis on consumer gadgets and services. She's been reporting on technology for over 10 years, with bylines at Tom’s Hardware, Channelnomics, and CRN UK.
191 Comments
Staff Picks
m
Is this even an issue for anyone under 40?
It's part of why I posted the ergonomic consideration.

Yes, it is apparently happening more with younger than older. Here's why:

There are is a minority but bigger-% for a younger age than for an older age, among people who can't stand 24fps because their brains are no longer being conditioned to tolerate low frame rates on big screens.

TL;DR Reason: Fewer movie theater visits, more TVs with default interpolation, extreme exposure to high frame rate gaming, continual exposure to higher refresh rate screens, and other things like that, conspire to reduce 24fps acclimation factor.

While it's a still a minority of population (e.g. 1% vs 5%; exact numbers still unknown but is a big gap)...
...It is still definitely observed of a very clear pattern emerging. It is noticeably bigger with the younger generation now than, say, the Gen-X or boomer generation.

In my experience, more 24fps discomfort seem to be occuring with the new generation who did not grow up with low frame rates or interpolation-free TVs. While 24fps on a phone is usually no problem, large-FOV 24fps (big screen TVs, theaters) seem to trigger motion sickness in more of the younger generation than the older generation.

Several also haven't gone to movie theaters often enough, to acclimate to Hollywood Filmmaker Mode. While I am not a film maker, I'm considered an industry expert in this topic (see earlier Google Scholar link). The pandemic lockdowns did not help, acclimating many to interpolation-riddled TVs.

I make it a point to manually configure my TV to Hollywood Filmmaker Mode, as I usually prefer original 24fps for my movies, even if I prefer extreme frame rates for my videogames/VR. But I have noticed that the accessibility considerations now happen increasingly more and more, due to the reduced exposure/acclimating to large-FOV 24fps as of late.

It's really annoying -- but this is a data point in my business.

Most famous filmmakers are older than 40, so there's a slight ergonomics generation gap.

It's a pretty muddy rabbit hole. Ugh.