Women sue men who used their Instagram feed to create AI porn influencers

AI ModelForge is a platform that teaches men how generate their own AI influencers.

See full article...

 

[Dark Jaguar]

Scum, and the Generative model solicited to create the deep fake NCII bears blame too.

 

[Dark Jaguar]

Well, not everyone.
It's peaceful not to have accounts there, can recommend.

The only thing I know about instagram is it's for adding old timey filters to your photos. I never got into it.

 

[Dark Jaguar]

It MAY be a bit over the top, but perhaps if we just dug a deep hole and shoved these people who do this kind of shit into the hole, and then covered it up, the human race would be disproportionately improved.

Do this for all the psychopaths. That we tolerate this in any way is kind of the problem.

PERHAPS being somewhat less extreme, we could just pass a law that any platform that allows this would be shut down regardless of any other content or its popularity. That'd force them to curate their content on upload, not allowing it to go live until it was inspected by a human. Filter it with an AI, if need be, but make really sure it's biased enough so that nothing problematic gets through. Reuploads would have to go through the same process.

This should not be an issue on social media. It shouldn't be an issue with humans, either, but that's a more intractable problem since it's psychopaths who tend to be our more in the spot-light leaders.

Careful, because this way goes another major problem. You use an AI to filter things, you get what Youtube's become. You get automatic filtering of any content that even uses the word "nazi", even when it's videos educating people on the horrors they committed and debunking pro-nazi propaganda.

This isn't going to be an easy solution, and saying "throw an algorithm at it" is how we got into this mess in the first place.

 

[Dark Jaguar]

This may sound unserious, but an honest question: I wonder how these sorts of rules would apply to a "Rule 34" type of situation, esp in regards to animated characters? Would that just be some kind of civil copyright violation of some sort?

If someone created a Fanvue page of Minnie/Mickey/Mario/Peach, would Disney/Nintendo sue under "Take It Down Act" or ... ?

Mickey, being a fictional character, can't sue for defamation if further obviously fictional images are made of Mickey smoking pot or slapping a baby or playing patty-cake with Jessica Rabbit or whatever. No one's worried about that. We're all worried about these photorealistic images that are very very hard to distinguish from the real thing, based on real people (mainly women and children, though this article focuses on the adult women victims of it in this case), to make NCII content. It's humiliating, it's an attack on their reputation (whether intentional or not), and it's just plain sleazy.