Women sue men who used their Instagram feed to create AI porn influencers

AI ModelForge is a platform that teaches men how generate their own AI influencers.

See full article...

 

[enilc]

It's a weird extension of the historically successful concept of the people who got rich from the Gold Rush of the 19th Century West in the US: Your odds of being successful were much higher selling the shovels and supplies to the high-risk gamblers known as miners.

 

[enilc]

This may sound unserious, but an honest question: I wonder how these sorts of rules would apply to a "Rule 34" type of situation, esp in regards to animated characters? Would that just be some kind of civil copyright violation of some sort?

If someone created a Fanvue page of Minnie/Mickey/Mario/Peach, would Disney/Nintendo sue under "Take It Down Act" or ... ?

 

[enilc]

This seems like a difficult case to prove? How do you show that the John Does actually used your specific photos to generate their content? Wouldn't you have to seize their computers and/or online activities?

You can get pretty detailed in a prompt to generate an image from scratch that looks very similar to a real person, without using an actual image.

As far as the named dirtbags with the Whop site, can they get by with a disclaimer "for entertainment purposes only?"

Or is the hope to be successful with jury/judicial nullification due to the obvious immoral purpose of the site?

 

[enilc]

1) You won't get a facial likeness with just text prompting.

You are woefully behind in your AI-prompting knowledge.

Can I introduce you to "Not Jason Statham" who was created without using any names and a three-sentence prompt: