No, the "only better choice" would be it not being mutually exclusive with non-gigantic font options. It's 2024, why does every such negligible cost thing in a digital design still need to be seen as some zero sum game.
They're defending it because they have parasocial relationships with the staff here. They're friendly and so it feels like they're defending community.
FFS people are posting user scripts to fix the problem. That is sad.
It actually just occurred to me that this is probably all intentional. Ars knows their reader base will do things like provide fixed CSS.
Why bother hiring competent staff when you can just do a shit job and let the community fix it?
It's the Condé Nast version of Bethesda's "let the modders fix it."
This is an intentional beta release, they knew it'd be buggy as shit and rushed it knowing it would piss off the community. Know they'd do the hard work of debugging and finding root causes. Just look at the dialog of these threads...people are doing what SHOULD be paid work. It's a back and forth just like you'd see a developer working with a designer in the real world.
Aurich, know it or not but you're exploiting the community you claim to care about. This ain't an open source project but you're taking help as if it were. You're getting paid subscribers to spend time fixing your release. It doesn't matter if they "want to." It's still exploitation with extra steps and a pretty bow. Do better.