I suppose unless you know it’s a literal Fox News Megyn Kelly talking point it’s easy to miss the sarcasm
War with...Iran?
- Thread starter Technarch
- Start date
- Status
TBH, I think MAGA generally doesn't care about Epstein and ostensibly doesn't want Trump starting wars. They were always going to vote Trump (probably even with the warmongering). That's not who this is aimed at.
This is aimed at the uninformed people who might actually might not have heard about the recent Epstein allegations from an underage girl specifically at Trump that the DOJ redacted from their published documents. Those folk could potentially swing an election. I'd argue it's working.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg3elr1dwpo
https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-5723968/epstein-files-trump-accusation-maxwell
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/26/trump-epstein-files-fbi
Don't want to edit my above post after it has reaction, but if I were Iran/Venezuela/tariffs/SCOTUS/whatever, I'd be tempted to append those allegations/articles/links to every single press release. Probably more effective than opposing the US military, maybe if that keeps happening he'll realize that whenever he's attacking, these allegations get surfaced.
Remember that trump repeatedly claimed that Obama would start a war with Iran to interfere with the upcoming election? I guess we shouldn’t at all be surprised it was yet more projection. Just like pizzagate was projection for Epstein files.
At this point Americans and Israeli athletes need to join Russian athletes as neutral athletes in the next Olympics. Not that I expect consistency out of politics.
If there's a future where people are being held accountable (one can dream) I look forward to huge insider trading convictions.
So to be clear: if I'd invested in the S&P 500 in 1871 I'd have seen gains of 145000%. Financial ruin facing us all.
So to be clear: if I'd invested in the S&P 500 in 1871 I'd have seen gains of 145000%. Financial ruin facing us all.
- Status