He didn't know who Moldaver was specifically until he was taken in by the "govermint" boys. Then he saw the wanted poster of her. Then he most definitely wanted to speak to her in addition to collecting the bounty.Moldaver is the person who put the bounty out. It makes sense that the ghoul wanted the head to cash in the bounty. We never had anything imply that the ghoul just wanted the head for funsies he was after the money. But then at some point they started acting like he specifically wanted to talk to moldaver regardless. He didn't show up at her place chasing the head, he showed up to talk to her.
At least that's what it look like. He had no specific need for the head other than as a bounty, but he seemed to want to talk to moldaver specifically and they even put in a little bit of backstory where they knew each other before the war.
He didn't know who Moldaver was specifically until he was taken in by the "govermint" boys. Then he saw the wanted poster of her. Then he most definitely wanted to speak to her in addition to collecting the bounty.
Sure does gives "choking the chicken" a whole new meaning, though...Chicken scientist according to himself!
Never mind that he last saw her 219 years ago. And probably wonders how she made it so long.He knew exactly who Moldaver was and always did. He was surprised by her appearance. The poster looked different than how he remembered her.
Did he though? How would he if he's never seen her in the wastelands before?He knew exactly who Moldaver was and always did. He was surprised by her appearance. The poster looked different than how he remembered her.
That would explain why Hank didn’t freak out when he saw her (and the riot in 32). In theory, the only people who would be overseer would be people from 31. If she was in 31, and took 32 over, she could have started the conflict to get out but still hasn’t been nominally in charge of 32.I thought maybe Moldaver was one of Bud's Buds, and that's how she got to the future; she was working against Vault-Tec from the inside after they bought out her company, and her research (though shelved) allowed her to reach a fairly high rank before the bombs dropped. She enlisted Coop to help her spy on Barb because she didn't have top-level access.
When they thawed her out for duty in the vault she took off for the surface instead, some time before Hank himself was activated, and became Moldaver. Just a theory.
You're coming at this from a perhaps logical, but still completely wrong direction. Literally none of this makes any difference whatsoever in terms of whether a character dies or not.Again missing my point. It isn't whether the mechanism is realistic, but whether it is plausible.
It's not plausible that magic syringes should exist in this world, even with the mentioned lore.
Unless it is just bad writing there are two things which makes me think he knew her as Moldaver. Maybe that was an alias we didn't see in the flashbacks but happened before the bombs fell or shortly after the bombs fell.Did he though? How would he if he's never seen her in the wastelands before?
As far as we know, he's only seen her at that Hollywoo meeting, and as I recall she isn't isn't introduced by name or at least not as Moldaver. I'm at work and can't rewatch that scene but I'm pretty sure.
I was thinking that too the only weird thing is the last episode would have been a good time to reveal that. If she was going to live then hanging on to a few secrets might be useful for future season minor plotpoints but the writer would know that wouldn't happen. So why not reveal something? They revealed flashback but the only post-bomb ones were her meeting Rose & Lucy in Shady Sands. Also it would have been a good way for Hank to undermine her credibility "she abandoned her Vault Lucy" but he didn't.That would explain why Hank didn’t freak out when he saw her (and the riot in 32). In theory, the only people who would be overseer would be people from 31. If she was in 31, and took 32 over, she could have started the conflict to get out but still hasn’t been nominally in charge of 32.
I mean, his wife was talking about getting into a “special vault for management” and we know what “management” means. Entirely possible we will get back to 31/32/33 and get some backstory there.I was thinking that too the only weird thing is the last episode would have been a good time to reveal that. If she was going to live then hanging on to a few secrets might be useful for future season minor plotpoints but the writer would know that wouldn't happen. So why not reveal something? They revealed flashback but the only post-bomb ones were her meeting Rose & Lucy in Shady Sands. Also it would have been a good way for Hank to undermine her credibility "she abandoned her Vault Lucy" but he didn't.
As I said in the similar post above probably never going to know for sure now since she is dead.
I had no intention of watching the series. Since its release, all I've heard is praise, and this coming from people who have never played a Fallout game.
That sold me, so I watched the 8 episodes on a lazy Saturday.
Damn. Two people did what the studio which owns the rights have not done in two games: make damn good Fallout.
I enjoyed the episodes so much, I watched them again the following weekend, glad to pick up on things I missed with the first viewing.
My expectations were shattered and I couldn't be more happy. Watching every episode build up to its conclusion was incredible.
I am very curious how they're going to handle New Vegas canon. The moment Lucy and Coop step into the Strip, canon is defined.
Will Mr. House still live? Control the Strip? Or will they take the safe approach and turn it into the desolate and abandoned city with no real explanation of its failing which the preview looks to have given us.
I can't be the only one who noticed the tower isn't lighting up the area during sunset as it does in the game.
Or that McCarran is gone.
My bet is for an ending with bad karma, independent New Vegas, Mr. House killed and Securitrons not upgraded.I had no intention of watching the series. Since its release, all I've heard is praise, and this coming from people who have never played a Fallout game.
That sold me, so I watched the 8 episodes on a lazy Saturday.
Damn. Two people did what the studio which owns the rights have not done in two games: make damn good Fallout.
I enjoyed the episodes so much, I watched them again the following weekend, glad to pick up on things I missed with the first viewing.
My expectations were shattered and I couldn't be more happy. Watching every episode build up to its conclusion was incredible.
I am very curious how they're going to handle New Vegas canon. The moment Lucy and Coop step into the Strip, canon is defined.
Will Mr. House still live? Control the Strip? Or will they take the safe approach and turn it into the desolate and abandoned city with no real explanation of its failing which the preview looks to have given us.
I can't be the only one who noticed the tower isn't lighting up the area during sunset as it does in the game.
Or that McCarran is gone.
Hmm that is possible too. Had forgot that ending. Without House or NCR eventually New Vegas fails at some point between those events and current day in the series.My bet is for an ending with bad karma, independent New Vegas, Mr. House killed and Securitrons not upgraded.
Oh I saw a lot of those side quests, but they never really explained what Vault-Tec actually hoped to accomplish by doing all of these obviously bad experiments that maybe started out trying to test something meaningful but got lethally dumbed down along the way. This instead laid out that there never was a coherent method and it was just executives playing god with really terrible ideas in an attempt to try different approaches to see which produced the "best" outcome.It's buried in a lot of the computer entries and holotapes scattered around over multiple games. If you just played the story without taking the time to check and read everything, you would have missed it. If you want a detailed (and somewhat overlong) summary of all the evidence, check out the videos by EpicNate on YT.
ETA some of it's in side quests, too, so easy to miss.
There's been speculation that it's all supposed to be leading to trying to create a "perfect" Vault (or sometimes space colony/ship). E.g. 111 would be a prototype for extended cryo sleep, 108 testing clone stability, 112 testing simulation while in cryo, etc.Oh I saw a lot of those side quests, but they never really explained what Vault-Tec actually hoped to accomplish by doing all of these obviously bad experiments that maybe started out trying to test something meaningful but got lethally dumbed down along the way. This instead laid out that there never was a coherent method and it was just executives playing god with really terrible ideas in an attempt to try different approaches to see which produced the "best" outcome.
I was thinking that too the only weird thing is the last episode would have been a good time to reveal that. If she was going to live then hanging on to a few secrets might be useful for future season minor plotpoints but the writer would know that wouldn't happen. So why not reveal something? They revealed flashback but the only post-bomb ones were her meeting Rose & Lucy in Shady Sands. Also it would have been a good way for Hank to undermine her credibility "she abandoned her Vault Lucy" but he didn't.
As I said in the similar post above probably never going to know for sure now since she is dead.
I am very curious how they're going to handle New Vegas canon. The moment Lucy and Coop step into the Strip, canon is defined.
Will Mr. House still live? Control the Strip? Or will they take the safe approach and turn it into the desolate and abandoned city with no real explanation of its failing which the preview looks to have given us.
I can't be the only one who noticed the tower isn't lighting up the area during sunset as it does in the game.
Or that McCarran is gone.
Apparently the show is too "woke" because Bethesda and Amazon attacks capitalism and America, and everyone knows the real Fallout was never about that. /sLook out guys - just because some "reviewer" with 17K subs that nobody has ever heard of didn't like the show, everything you thought about it is wrong.
Ugh, was that the gist of the "review"? When I saw it was someone literally droning, in the most punchable voice imaginable, for an hour and a half, I stopped watching (about 30 seconds in).Apparently the show is too "woke" because Bethesda and Amazon attacks capitalism and America, and everyone knows the real Fallout was never about that. /s
No, I had the misfortune of being served a video on Youtube with that message because, obviously, if you indicate interest in a subject by viewing one video, one must be utterly obsessed with the subject to the exclusion of everything else. I have a lot of "Fallout series is woke" in my Youtube-feed at the moment.Ugh, was that the gist of the "review"? When I saw it was someone literally droning, in the most punchable voice imaginable, for an hour and a half, I stopped watching (about 30 seconds in).
2 years here and you think shit like this flies?Meanwhile, a review from an actual (ie: not a brainless blegthesda shill) Fallout fan: