Video player looks like a 1-inch TV from the ’60s and is wondrous, pointless fun

mygeek911

Ars Scholae Palatinae
946
Subscriptor++
I can already smell the dust heating up from the test tubes.

IMG_0302.jpeg
 
Upvote
81 (81 / 0)

Fatesrider

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,171
Subscriptor
With many TV owners relying on flat buttons and their voice to control TVs, turning a knob or pressing a button to flip through content feels novel. It also makes me wonder if today’s youth understand the meaning of phrases like “flipping channels” and “channel surfing.” Emulating a live TV, the TinyTV syncs timestamps, so that if you return to a "channel," the video will play from a middle point, as if the content had been playing the whole time you were watching something else.
Memories of the announcer saying, "Don't touch that dial!" near the end of the show...
 
Upvote
51 (52 / -1)

Chuckstar

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,340
Subscriptor
The CRTs used in video camera eyepieces were even smaller than that little color TV mentioned in the article (but obviously were not full-fledged TVs). For better sharpness, they used little B&W CRTs. More expensive designs would run the CRT at triple the refresh rate, with a color wheel spinning in front of it, which would produce a pretty good color image while retaining the sharpness of a B&W image. Sharpness was an important element, since being able to tell whether the image is in focus is a key concern of the camera operator, while color fidelity of the eyepiece image was of much lesser concern.
 
Upvote
72 (72 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Pete M

Seniorius Lurkius
16
Needs to support a Space Command remote for that real clicker experience.
51386621761_9627b184da_c.jpg


Serious aside: I’ve been wanting to pickup one of these remotes for nostalgic reasons - it was at archaic when I had to use one - and to show people what a real “clicker” is. A little surprising how much these old remotes go for on eBay.

For those who have never seen/used one, it used mechanical buttons to produce high frequency tones. One advantage it had over modern remotes - no batteries required.
 
Upvote
102 (102 / 0)
This is the definition of conspicuous consumption.
It's far from the dumbest or most egregious waste of resources, but man you have to wonder what the carbon footprint of a tiny novelty TV like this is, something that's going to get a "oh neat" for a few hours and then sit, forgotten, like all the other novelty tchotchkes out there.
 
Upvote
25 (36 / -11)

NetMage

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,004
It seems neat but the lack of attention to detail bothers me. One of the knobs should also be the power button with one click to turn on and then adjust the volume, not have buttons on top. The cheap plastic case shouldn’t have a seam down the front and should have more detail, etc. It could have been done so much better.
 
Upvote
7 (15 / -8)

AusPeter

Ars Praefectus
5,182
Subscriptor
Needs to support a Space Command remote for that real clicker experience. View attachment 116792

Serious aside: I’ve been wanting to pickup one of these remotes for nostalgic reasons - it was at archaic when I had to use one - and to show people what a real “clicker” is. A little surprising how much these old remotes go for on eBay.

For those who have never seen/used one, it used mechanical buttons to produce high frequency tones. One advantage it had over modern remotes - no batteries required.
Growing up, we had something similar (different brand) but it only had 2 buttons. But a really ingenious device.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
"(The smallest CRT TV was Panasonic’s Travelvision CT-101, which came out in 1984 with a 1.5-inch screen and is rare today.)"

They aren't technically TVs, no tuner; but I'm pretty sure that older video recorder viewfinders were CRT based and had still smaller screens(though the tubes tended to be pretty long; because the ergonomics of having the viewfinder stick out a little from the body of the camera made hiding the length a nonissue).

Those tubes are probably turning into unobtanium at this point; but they were pretty neat.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

Chuckstar

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,340
Subscriptor
Needs to support a Space Command remote for that real clicker experience. View attachment 116792

Serious aside: I’ve been wanting to pickup one of these remotes for nostalgic reasons - it was at archaic when I had to use one - and to show people what a real “clicker” is. A little surprising how much these old remotes go for on eBay.

For those who have never seen/used one, it used mechanical buttons to produce high frequency tones. One advantage it had over modern remotes - no batteries required.
A lot of TV shows used this as the remote control for the TV loooooong after it was no longer how TV remotes worked. Because it made a distinctive clicking sound that made it clear the actor had pressed a button. That audible click wasn't what the TV listened for, though, since as you point out the TV was listening for ultrasonic sounds. The mechanism worked by having a little hammer strike a little aluminum bar, that vibrated at an ultrasonic frequency. It worked like a little piano, where each button resulted in a separate hammer hitting a differently-tuned bar. Somewhere in the mechanism a click was produced, separate from the ultrasonic tone emitted by the aluminum bar.

EDIT: TV shows didn't necessarily use that exact model, but rather that type of "clicker" remote control.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
26 (26 / 0)
What a fun little thing. Tiny version of old tech are always satisfying and this is fun whimsy.

I built a mini PET to basically operate as a case for a Pi Zero running Pihole. It could just as easily be a screen in a boxy case, but this gives it more character and makes me smile.
1756423165686.png


At the other end of the scale, I've modified a couple of old tube radios to work as AirPlay targets. This one's my bedside radio, complete with lighting that turns on when it's playing and a functioning off switch. I made sure all modifications were reversible, the old tube guts are still in there. Does it work any better than some modern connected gadget? No. Does it bring me joy both in the design and construction and use? Yes.
1756423352665.png
 
Upvote
93 (93 / 0)