<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jack_o:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Farlander30:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jack_o:<BR>And fourty-nine percent of them don't have any sense. If I was forced to cut back, the first thing that would go for me would be the internet connection because it just doesn't have as much intrinsic value as say for example, well, food and shelter.<BR><BR>Always nice to see what Verizon thinks of its self. So, they change the slogan from "Can you hear me now?" to "Can you twitter me now?" </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Where the hell do you get that they'd value their internet over potentially losing food and shelter? Nice how you just insult all 49% for that, as well, when you are somehow (I have no idea how) misinterpreting the point of that statement.<BR><BR>Since your own sense was (irony!) absent, let's go over a list of what everyone else obviously considers things that can go first:<BR>1.)Paid TV service.<BR>2.)Cell phone.<BR>3.)Eating out.<BR>4.)Doing anything else "out", for that matter (movies, drinking, etc.)<BR>5.)Movie/Game rentals.<BR>6.)Excessive power usage (ie - being mindful of what you use, when, and how much).<BR><BR>Not that I expect facts or sense to get in the way of your Verizon haterade.<BR><BR>EDIT: It's not conceited or stupid of Verizon, if they came up with those answers from a poll of their own customers, especially when giving internet up last makes sense to so many people nowadays. Just because you disagree doesn't make all those people senseless or stupid. It just makes you an ass for saying so. </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR>"Where the hell do you get that they'd value their internet over potentially losing food and shelter?"<BR><BR>Because they said so right there in black and white, because it said: <BR><BR>"Fourty-nine percent of existing fiber to the home users said that their Internet connection would be the "last thing" they would give up if the economy forced them to cut back."<BR><BR>specifically > "...would be the "last thing" they would give up" <BR><BR>Meaning that everything else would go first before the internet connection which would be the last thing to go. That means that everything else before the internet connection is considered expendable just to maintain the internet access, that includes food and shelter because they are part of that everything else. Now maybe someone would not give up their home or eating for an internet connection, but there are people who are so addicted to it they will give up marriages, time with their family and friends, so like a drug addict they would sacrifice those things which are really more important to get their 'fix' from something that has no intrinsic value compared to more things of value for the most part. <BR><BR>This was a dumb or smug and conceited thing for Verizon to say because it highlites the stupidity of such a choice implying that Verizon thinks not too well of their customers. So basically Verizon said "We have them so addicted to their internet connections that they would be stupid enough to keep us and give up everything else."<BR><BR>Are you a Verizon customer?<BR><BR><BR><BR><I>This comment was edited by Jack_o on June 30, 2009 23:12</I> </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR><BR>Are your working for another telco? You must, since you seem to be deliberately misinterpreting statements. That, or you're reading comprehension impaired.<BR><BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jack_o:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Chris R.:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jack_o:<BR>"Fourty-nine percent of existing fiber to the home users said that their Internet connection would be the "last thing" they would give up if the economy forced them to cut back."<BR><BR>And fourty-nine percent of them don't have any sense. If I was forced to cut back, the first thing that would go for me would be the internet connection because it just doesn't have as much intrinsic value as say for example, well, food and shelter.<BR><BR>Always nice to see what Verizon thinks of its self. So, they change the slogan from "Can you hear me now?" to "Can you twitter me now?" </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Seams like you're deliberately misinterpreting that statement. Internet would be one of the last things to go in my household, <B>We cut cable when FiOS came available (and yes we cut FiOS TV as well), I'd cut netflix first, <I>Cut eating out</I> before I cut internet.</B> I already cut my cell phone, and I'd probably have my wife cut hers before we got rid of the Fiber. It really does provide the most bang for the buck and makes some utilities cheaper such as getting VOIP instead of a traditional phone. It's not essential, but it's about as close as it can get. </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Nah, not 'deliberately misinterpreting', I was pointing out what a conceited and stupid thing it was for Verizon to make their customers sound so stupid for the sake of what smacks squarely of advertising in the guise of research.<BR><BR>Are you serious, you would cut out food and go hungry, allow your family to go hungry, as long as you could have your internet connection? </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Yup. Because eating out is the only means of feeding yourself or your family. There's no conceivable way one could EAT AT HOME!