CompleteAndUtterShamelessCorruption?I'm looking for a 10 letter word that starts with "Co" and ends with "rruption". Anyone lend a hand?
I hope nobody tell them that inadvertently they have launched a jobs program for physicists and semi engineers.I'm looking for a 10 letter word that starts with "Co" and ends with "rruption". Anyone lend a hand?
I used to say "Manuer Touch", but I'm adopting yours.I'd normally support the government taking equity stakes in an emerging technology, but this deal leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Leave it to this President to corrupt a good idea. Truly, the Sidam touch.
“With today’s CHIPS Research and Development investments in quantum computing, the Trump administration is leading the world into a new era of American innovation,” said US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick.
Cografterruption (see also: Cotrumpurruption)I'm looking for a 10 letter word that starts with "Co" and ends with "rruption". Anyone lend a hand?
I was looking for a phrase that started with “Co” and ended with “ngressional Authorization”.I'm looking for a 10 letter word that starts with "Co" and ends with "rruption". Anyone lend a hand?
They asked Lil Mikey J and he said it's cool.I was looking for a phrase that started with “Co” and ended with “ngressional Authorization”.
I know this really wasn't your point, and not that I'm a fan of capitalism, but...It could be there's ways to carefully invest government money in private industry- maybe that's the possible, and there's a conversation somewhere on how to do that in a fair, stable, and equitable way.
Obama also caught a lot of flak from the GOP over Solyndra, although maybe China wouldn't be the world leader in solar panel production today if we'd done more of that instead of less. They certainly wouldn't have 85% market share by wattage, in any case.Oh, by the way, Gray Man bad, Orange Man gooooood:
Former President Donald Trump recently took an unexpected stance against the CHIPS Act, a bipartisan initiative aimed at strengthening U.S. semiconductor manufacturing. During his address to Congress, Trump called the law a “horrible, horrible thing” and suggested repealing it, catching many lawmakers off guard. His remarks particularly surprised Republicans, who had previously been reassured of his administration’s support.
There’s a very innovation averse trend here in these threads lately. Quantum isn’t being built to replace people anymore than the spreadsheet, WYSIWYG, Internet, or any other computing improvement in the last 30 years. Real quantum computing could be amazing for drug design, transportation planning, and many other things. Having American companies lead this field would be good for the US.I like how these are all "Will create thousands of jobs"
Quantum will of course be used for speeding up processing so less people need to do something.
Or AI.
Which is famous for providing thousands of jobs....
It's often counterproductive to have nuance when those in power choose not to. Innovation is pretty much always a mixed bag of benefits and risks, and responsible folks try to magnify the benefits and reduce the risks. But when you have no faith in leaders' abilities to reduce the risks, those risks become the thing that needs to be focused on. Altering viruses in order to study and prepare for upcoming disasters is incredibly valuable. But if we expect the people doing the work to quickly release the viruses, you don't support the research until someone else is in charge.There’s a very innovation averse trend here in these threads lately. Quantum isn’t being built to replace people anymore than the spreadsheet, WYSIWYG, Internet, or any other computing improvement in the last 30 years. Real quantum computing could be amazing for drug design, transportation planning, and many other things. Having American companies lead this field would be good for the US.
However, enabling corruption by picking winners based on if a Trump family member or buddy is on the board is troubling.
It entirely depends on how you frame it:Every other day someone gets a $1B+ payout without any congressional oversight. It's impossible to tell if any of them are legitimate investments. The interest on our debt is becoming the predominant usage of our tax dollars.
It is a damned if you do or don't scenario.I know this really wasn't your point, and not that I'm a fan of capitalism, but...
In a capitalist society, governments benefit from giving money to the private sector by taxing the resulting improved economy. There is no capacity for fairness when a government with a capitalist framework takes a stake in private companies. The whole point of a capitalist approach is that the government is a neutral player in any given industry. If a judge owns stock in a company, they're (theoretically) supposed to recuse themselves from cases involving that company. What, is the government going to recuse itself from regulating industries now?
Uggghh.
If it's not the slush fund or the ways trump/family companies always seem to be quietly involved in getting "grants" and the like from the Federal Government, then it's the DOJ (led by The Great Bloviator's personal criminal attorney) barring audits of trump/family tax returns "that were raised or could have been raised". The corruption is absolutely staggering.Too bad they now made it illegal to check on them, so we’ll never know.
As to your attempt to charge Biden with corruption, I call bullshit. And feel free to prove me wrong, because despite trumpian lickspittles James Comer and crew taking a long time and lots of government money to investigate Biden, they found that--hold on to your hat, now--his son had screwed up his taxes and owned an unlicensed firearm. I would say that Hunter Biden/President Joe Biden's actions are molehills compared to trump's Olympus Mons, but that's giving far too much weight to Biden's actions and nowhere near enough to trump's.....oh. They're all corrupt, Biden included.
Mussolini, yes. Marx not so much.Government ownership and control of the economy. Both Marx and Mussolini would approve.
I think you might need to gain a better understanding of both systems if you're comfortable stating that equivalency.Boy, the line between communism and crony capitalism is ... just not there. The world is a wheel.
No? Workers own the means of production? Dictatorship of the proletariat? Oh, eventually the state is supposed to wither away, but in the meantime...Mussolini, yes. Marx not so much.
It's literally in the story and what I quoted:As to your attempt to charge Biden with corruption, I call bullshit. And feel free to prove me wrong, because despite trumpian lickspittles James Comer and crew taking a long time and lots of government money to investigate Biden, they found that--hold on to your hat, now--his son had screwed up his taxes and owned an unlicensed firearm. I would say that Hunter Biden/President Joe Biden's actions are molehills compared to trump's Olympus Mons, but that's giving far too much weight to Biden's actions and nowhere near enough to trump's.
The company, which has sealed partnerships with Democratic and Republican administrations, is set to receive $100 million, by far its largest US government award to date.
You really misunderstand what is going on.No? Workers own the means of production? Dictatorship of the proletariat? Oh, eventually the state is supposed to wither away, but in the meantime...
Except that in capitalism the capital owns the government so it is not a neutral party as can be seen by all politicians running their errands. Capitalism == corruption.I know this really wasn't your point, and not that I'm a fan of capitalism, but...
In a capitalist society, governments benefit from giving money to the private sector by taxing the resulting improved economy. There is no capacity for fairness when a government with a capitalist framework takes a stake in private companies. The whole point of a capitalist approach is that the government is a neutral player in any given industry. If a judge owns stock in a company, they're (theoretically) supposed to recuse themselves from cases involving that company. What, is the government going to recuse itself from regulating industries now?
Uggghh.
Yeah but it doesn’t help poor or black people and that’s the only thing they had a problem with'Member when the Republican party cried "socialism" at pretty much anything that resembled government influence outside of an essentially unconditional subsidy?
Pepperidge Farms remembers.
Now they're totally fine with becoming major stakeholders in basically self-sufficient enterprises.