Most Ars articles are pretty long. I didn’t find this one to be out of the ordinary from what I usually read here.Is it me or is this really hard to read? (really could just be me)
For an article that talks about "companies that recently made my life" I felt like I had to get several paragraphs in to even know what was being talked about with some of these.
Yet.I'm glad my banjos do not require an internet connection.
Unshittification is almost always a result of treating people decently and not innovation."Unshittification" is not always the result of "innovation"—sometimes it's just about treating people decently.
If it's any consolation I found a French company that was even worse. In order to "annuler mon abonne" I was required to fill in a massive survey of everything but my inside leg measurement. The result of this was a half price subscription offer...which I declined...to be offered an even cheaper subscription...which I declined...a couple of begging emails and then I got an acknowledgement that my subscription had ceased, followed by about two emails a week asking me to reconsider, ignoring the "unsubscribe" button.As to adding a new channel with Amazon Prime, how easy will it be to cancel it at the end of the month. Finding that option can be sneakily difficult.
If you're anything like me, it's because you went into the article hoping to quickly find out, "Are any of these unshittifications useful to me?" Since there was no summary at the top of each section (say, the way there might be in a board game roundup), you had to read way down into each section to find out what was being discussed. Frustration was probably added by the first two being related to niche products, and from the same niche, to boot.Is it me or is this really hard to read? (really could just be me)
For an article that talks about "companies that recently made my life" I felt like I had to get several paragraphs in to even know what was being talked about with some of these.
This is honestly a fair assessment.I know this sounds super aggressive, but this reads like a bootlicker piece. This should be barebones customer service, not standout performances.
Is it me or is this really hard to read? (really could just be me)
For an article that talks about "companies that recently made my life" I felt like I had to get several paragraphs in to even know what was being talked about with some of these.
Two of the examples are invasive DRM schemes that are slightly less invasive than they could be, and the third one is a company generously agreeing to accept the customer's money. It's AMAZING how low the customer service standards are in software.
What do you mean, "yet"? They already did and the author is celebrating the removal of that requirement and the simple solution of buying a device for $50-70 instead.Yet.
Meanwhile beatings will continue until productivity improves, when there will be a day off beatings before resumption as the next bonus is chased by the C-suite.
Are you complaining that people are misusing the word enshittification or are you complaining about it being "made up?"There is a certain fake word that has been excreted on almost every article comment section for months. It means "something worsening" and appears unwanted, like a little bit of poo left on the floor by your dog, child, or neighbour. Said dog/child/neighbour beams at you as if it's the best present in the world.
As it is with this non-word. Every single person who uses it thinks they're oh so very clever indeed when it adds just as much to a conversation or comment as the aforementioned poo. Yet, people still continue excreting it everywhere, smiling proudly.
Sometimes it's the entire comment and even though it adds as much information or comedy as the phrase "first post," certain people are still so enamoured of it that they will inhale deeply as they click upvote, wishing they'd been clever enough themselves to have thought of discharging that first.
People continue to smear it all over forums and boards, and it's stinking up the place. That's right. Using this not-a-real-term itself makes things worse. How ironic.
Just say no to endoctorowification.
Paddle harder if you can still hear them...I'm glad my banjos do not require an internet connection.
Please explain to me and everyone else here what the difference is between "fake" and "real" words.There is a certain fake word
Years and years ago I attended a time-share presentation in Florida (did it for the laughs only). I went through the expected high pressure sales spiel, and finally pissed off the salesman when it was obvious that I wasn't buying his BS. The path to the exit door took me through another room where I was asked "Did you forget something?". It turned out that what I forgot was a time-share contract, and this other room was set up to try and sell at a huge discount the time-shares of people who were trying to dump their time-shares. I simply laughed and continued walking.If it's any consolation I found a French company that was even worse. In order to "annuler mon abonne" I was required to fill in a massive survey of everything but my inside leg measurement. The result of this was a half price subscription offer...which I declined...to be offered an even cheaper subscription...which I declined...a couple of begging emails and then I got an acknowledgement that my subscription had ceased, followed by about two emails a week asking me to reconsider, ignoring the "unsubscribe" button.
Tu sais ce que je veux te dire? I believe the word "emmerdement" already exists in French.
I mean, come on folks, "Better DRM?" The celebration is that they had to buy a $50-70 dongle just to use what they already bought.
"Cromulent" would be a good example.Please explain to me and everyone else here what the difference is between "fake" and "real" words.
A company that quickly corrects and sincerely makes right a lapse in service deserves credit. In these first two cases, the company had aggressively unfriendly policies that 1) they agreed were costing them money, and in the second case, represented heavy-handed and thoughtless abuse. Jeebus, if they could track the transaction to the email of the specific license to the end user, they already knew they had approved the transaction. This is not “deshittification” in any way. It’s undoing one single fuck-up.I like the article and good customer service really can make you appreciate a company.
That said I had the distinct feel that you (and we) have been beaten so badly that stories of abusing customers less now qualify as good customer service. In each of these cases why did fixing a terrible solution for key customers (dongles), agreeing not to perpetrate fraud (disabling something you bought), or simply taking your money for a service (max) now qualify as good service? Why can’t this be the baseline and good be reserved for thinking of the customer first or really going out of their way to help?
In many ways that these are good examples exemplifies how bad things have become. Sigh.
Agreed. "Company meets the bare minimum baseline to have a functionally usable product" is not unshittification. It's table stakes.Two of the examples are invasive DRM schemes that are slightly less invasive than they could be, and the third one is a company generously agreeing to accept the customer's money. It's AMAZING how low the customer service standards are in software.
EDIT: This was the article that annoyed me enough to post. Something about the above examples being regarded as "unusually good" really drives home the state of the modern software industry.
It's not Evan Edinger?The article photo has no attribution or caption. Can I assume that's the Nate Anderson 1990's model?