what's unacceptable here?We could give them more civilized weapons with which they could deter invasions in more acceptable ways, but we are stingy, so they do shit like this. Love the creativity.
I guarantee you wouldn't live long after being in the blast of that missile, unless you just happened to get really lucky about where you got hit. Meanwhile, that thermite isn't burning very long. It seems to burn just about long enough to light the undertgrowth on fire. Getting out of the way of the slow-moving drone would be entirely feasible. I wouldn't want to be the target of that thermite drone, but if I had to choose between that and the blast-fragmentation warhead... easy call.The missile that fires thousands of tungsten ball bearings probably causes more suffering than this. The bearings can hurt you but not kill you. If you are under this, I have a hard time thinking that you are going to live for long.
Wowzers.
Re Geneva Convention — seems like something designed for colonial powers fighting wars of choice, like France fighting Britain over some territory in the Americas. Ukraine was invaded by an evil empire and is fighting for its existence. The only logical constraint for them to impose on themselves is their own enlightened self interest. They have to be in it to win it, not to conform to some imperialist honor code.
What is a "war crime against humanity"?You guys do understand, you are making publicity, to a Major war crime and crime against humanity don't you???
Do you really believe, burning people alive, even if they are evil, to be ok???
If you do, you are really no better than them, if not worse........
I guarantee you wouldn't live long after being in the blast of that missile, unless you just happened to get really lucky about where you got hit. Meanwhile, that thermite isn't burning very long. It seems to burn just about long enough to light the undertgrowth on fire. Getting out of the way of the slow-moving drone would be entirely feasible. I wouldn't want to be the target of that thermite drone, but if I had to choose between that and the blast-fragmentation warhead... easy call.
Thermite also has the advantage of being pretty darn energy-dense. It doesn't take a lot of mass to make a lot of fire.How can they fit that much fuel on a drone? Genuinely curious how one tiny little machine can throw that much fire.
That is a seriously sick joke to make about humans being incinerated.
We are no better than our ancestors when it comes to callousness and cruelty.
burning enemy cover is not a war crime, never has been, intentionally burning the enemy is frowned upon, and illegal for some militaries (self enforced mostly) including the United States, however "accidentally" burning the enemy "its war they were too close to the cover we had to defoliate, their fault" notably this drone can't effectively be aimed at individualsThis sounds like the technology of war criminals. What insane individual thought this up and how can civilized 21st militaries be using it? I don't want my tax dollars paying for this.
Yes get out of cover, unarmed with hands behind their heads. and walk towards the Ukrainian positions, they can't go the other way because then Russian barrier troops will execute them.If only there were something they could do to avoid being incinerated.
Willie Peete is going to make a comeback. Putin has used it in several recent actions in Chechnia. Oh, and I don't think Putin will have any excuse not to use it on civilian populations. After all, this is a dictator that has no problem targeting schools full of children or kidnapping children to "re-educate" them.WWI problems require WWI solutions.
They are not that tiny in the "heavy" end of things, Ukrainian Vampire drone weights 11kg and can carry a 5kg bomb.How can they fit that much fuel on a drone? Genuinely curious how one tiny little machine can throw that much fire.
WP never left, what do you think multispectral smoke is?Willie Peete is going to make a comeback. Putin has used it in several recent actions in Chechnia. Oh, and I don't think Putin will have any excuse not to use it on civilian populations. After all, this is a dictator that has no problem targeting schools full of children or kidnapping children to "re-educate" them.
I don't believe killing anyone by any mechanism is "ok", I do however believe that it is (far too) often necessary.You guys do understand, you are making publicity, to a Major war crime and crime against humanity don't you???
Do you really believe, burning people alive, even if they are evil, to be ok???
If you do, you are really no better than them, if not worse........
Yes get out of cover, unarmed with hands behind their heads. and walk towards the Ukrainian positions, they can't go the other way because then Russian barrier troops will execute them.
I hate to be the one to tell you this, but your tax dollars have paid for way, way worse -- used by your own country -- repeatedly over the last 100 years or soThis sounds like the technology of war criminals. What insane individual thought this up and how can civilized 21st militaries be using it? I don't want my tax dollars paying for this.
especially as, as i mentioned earlier, thermite isn't (usually) sticky like napalm, stop, drop and roll should work if you aren't directly hit, if you are, strip first, and get out of the wayI guarantee you wouldn't live long after being in the blast of that missile, unless you just happened to get really lucky about where you got hit. Meanwhile, that thermite isn't burning very long. It seems to burn just about long enough to light the undertgrowth on fire. Getting out of the way of the slow-moving drone would be entirely feasible. I wouldn't want to be the target of that thermite drone, but if I had to choose between that and the blast-fragmentation warhead... easy call.
Willie Peete is going to make a comeback. Putin has used it in several recent actions in Chechnia. Oh, and I don't think Putin will have any excuse not to use it on civilian populations. After all, this is a dictator that has no problem targeting schools full of children or kidnapping children to "re-educate" them.
Dont quote them then. It was so hard not to downvote you. Just dont quote trashTankies are worthless trash.
Publicizing war crimes is a pretty important thing, actually.You guys do understand, you are making publicity, to a Major war crime and crime against humanity don't you???
Do you really believe, burning people alive, even if they are evil, to be ok???
If you do, you are really no better than them, if not worse........
That tracks for me. At reasonable weights, it would be far more effective at setting brush around a position on fire than immolating people. Thermite is a wonderfully effective/powerful incendiary, but it is not great for incinerating a large area.Only if used to deliberately target infantry. The videoed operations so far seem to have been intended to burn away protective cover (trees/brush), which is a permitted use even if there's a risk of inflicting casualties as a side effect of the application of incendiaries.
You're right, instead your tax dollars should be used to quickly and efficiently end the war by directly engaging Russian troops in Ukraine.This sounds like the technology of war criminals. What insane individual thought this up and how can civilized 21st militaries be using it? I don't want my tax dollars paying for this.
yes its a phonetic for white phosphorus, I think the proper phonetic is whiskey Pluto.Is that white phosphorous (searches just return guys named Willie Peete)? Because if so, how can it have a comeback when it never went anywhere to begin with? Israel loves using the stuff.
A standard high explosive would probably be better. If you had a specific spot on a structure you wanted to burn through and could land the drone on it, that might be functional, but spraying a little incendiary around probably won't do much.One of those things spraying about in a refinery is going to burn for a long time.
I'm thinking the point @Air_Cooled_Driver is making is that Ukraine could have won this war, handily and completely, if we had actually supported them like a real ally. With appropriate weapons both quality and quantity and freedom to act in accordance with their tactical and strategic goals.what's unacceptable here?
That tracks for me. At reasonable weights, it would be far more effective at setting brush around a position on fire than immolating people. Thermite is a wonderfully effective/powerful incendiary, but it is not great for incinerating a large area.
Sadly not. Blocking brigades shoot anyone trying to leave, and surrendering Russians have been deliberately shelled by their own sideI know it’s unpopular, but I agree wholeheartedly. Any Russian not wanting to be subjected to a horrible death is free to leave or surrender, after which they should absolutely be treated humanely.
fortunately, they have a bit of a tube shortage, so they may be less likely to shell them, and que in Ukrainian counter battery radarSadly not. Blocking brigades shoot anyone trying to leave, and surrendering Russians have been deliberately shelled by their own side
Signing a treaty to dispose of all nuclear weapons would be the first step, but many countries can't even do that.Where do I sign for world peace? I really, really would like to see all violence, oppression, suffering and plain disrespect for life stop at once.