UK investigating X after Grok undressed thousands of women and children

Status
You're currently viewing only ldrn's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

ldrn

Ars Centurion
319
Subscriptor
I want very badly to hear the reasoning behind the downvotes to your post.

I'll bet there is a really great argument behind them. /s

As a middle-aged man with a preteen daughter, I am surprised by the folks that have thus far defended 'Grok' and its overlords. Oops, I meant edgelords.
This is the same OFCOM that's insisting on "age verification" that largely goes after adults, and is targeting VPNs next with the excuse "well, a child with a credit card might subscribe to one" -- at least some of the distrust is from people who have memories longer than a goldfish and don't see "but thinkofthechildren" as an instant "I win" button on the internet.

Not that I'd dare disagree with you after you mashed that button yourself, of course.
 
Upvote
-16 (0 / -16)

ldrn

Ars Centurion
319
Subscriptor
Regardless, it seems like you are conflating the issues and then reprimanding me for an opinion that isn't my own.

You are welcome to disagree with me, don't be shy.
Oh, then I apologi--
I hope you will try and not be surprised when people wonder why you're taking a stance against age verification and VPNs when we're talking about naked kids created by the X bot.
... ah, nevermind. See, I'd like to avoid that wondering and related assumptions, so...

I'll stick with: I certainly could never continue to question OFCOM's claims to need such sweeping powers over the internet, as I have in the past, now that it's revealed to be about CSAM. I also could never question their quote at the end of the article for the same reason.

[...] Frankly, I think a lot about doing away with anonymity on the web as a potential benefit when it comes to many issues (including CSAM). [...]
Circling back to this, in the same vein: who would dare continuing to question ending online anonymity if it means being accused of supporting CSAM?

So when OFCOM wants to insert backdoors into encryption, de-anonymize the internet, ban wikipedia or whatever, it's the perfect excuse to try and shut down disagreement.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
-2 (0 / -2)
Status
You're currently viewing only ldrn's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.