Regardless, it seems like you are conflating the issues and then reprimanding me for an opinion that isn't my own.
You are welcome to disagree with me, don't be shy.
Oh, then I apologi--
I hope you will try and not be surprised when people wonder why you're taking a stance against age verification and VPNs when we're talking about naked kids created by the X bot.
... ah, nevermind. See, I'd like to avoid that wondering and related assumptions, so...
I'll stick with: I certainly could never
continue to question OFCOM's claims to need such sweeping powers over the internet, as I have in the past, now that it's revealed to be about CSAM. I also could never question their quote at the end of the article for the same reason.
[...] Frankly, I think a lot about doing away with anonymity on the web as a potential benefit when it comes to many issues (including CSAM). [...]
Circling back to this, in the same vein: who would dare continuing to question ending online anonymity if it means being accused of supporting CSAM?
So when OFCOM wants to
insert backdoors into encryption, de-anonymize the internet, ban wikipedia or whatever, it's the perfect excuse to try and shut down disagreement.