Twitter starts purging inactive accounts after quiet policy change

Mardaneus

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,041
He wants content and engagement, which generate money.
Give him a poop emoji once every two weeks and you'll only see a first-time limited spike of "engagement", followed by nobody caring again until he changes the rules again...
He's trolling for attention. I'm a very vocal supporter of letting him wither alone in his swamp. But if you are worried about protecting a brand, you can troll back by scrictly following his rules.

They can also post a single whitespace post per week. A blank vote is important, yet doesn't give him what he craves.
And that gives Musk what he wants. They responded to his threat, they find Twitter important enough that they feel the need to comply with his demands. Again the best way to deal with someone like that is to not do what they demand. And in this case that means no tweets, not a single one.
 
Upvote
28 (28 / 0)

bearcatman

Smack-Fu Master, in training
88
Musk couldn't embody "bully" more if he tried. First he set up a scenario to poke NPR. When they weren't having it and left, he then started trying to taunt them back to the playground so he could bully them again.

His behavior just boggles my mind. He has more wealth than he could spend in several lifetimes. Even after throwing away all the money on Twitter! He could be doing anything with his time, and this is what he chooses to do. I would almost feel sorry for him, except for all the collateral damage he does in the meantime.
 
Upvote
33 (33 / 0)

ItchyPoo

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,350
Subscriptor
No. NPR should not do that, or respond in any other way that would result in them putting out a tweet. Because that is what Musk wants, he wants NPR and others to cave to the threats he is making. Well wants, I suspect it is more expects them to cave seeing his behavior is like that abusive person who is completely flabbergasted that his target does not want to be abused since said abuse is for the victims own good.
I think it’s more complex. NPR also does n want their account going to some npr super troll. Interesting to see how they will react.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

fenncruz

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,759
Subscriptor++
I'm tempted to set up a script to log my old account in just frequently enough to reset the timer. I don't know as my username is particularly sought after, but I like the thought of being a little bit of a nail house in the database.

Just not sure if I can be arsed to dig up my creds though.
Though that also helps Twitter by boosting it's mDau stats.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Username_Required

Smack-Fu Master, in training
15
Serious question: if you're still on Twitter, why? What's it going to take for you to stop propping up this crackpot despot?

It doesn't matter if you're not paying for a check mark. It doesn't matter if you don't post, or the only time you do post is to call out racism, discrimination, and/or fascism. It doesn't matter if you just look at funny posts or news or traffic alerts (as if there are no other outlets for news, funny things, or traffic/weather). It doesn't matter if "all your friends are on Twitter" (as if there's no other way to keep in touch with people today except Twitter). None of that matters. Every time you hit Twitter's servers, you're supporting Elon Musk.

So, if you're still supporting Elon Musk, what's it going to take for you to stop?
The answer I've heard is as simple as it is disgusting- make Twitter effectively 'unuseable'. As long as people can curate their timelines and hawk their wares, they'll stay.

All of those experts pointing out creeping fascism and pathocracy will stay with a fascist, because it is in their professional interest to stay.

And nothing you or I say will ever sway them, because they won't hear it or care enough to act upon their own assessments in a meaningful way.
 
Upvote
12 (14 / -2)

Mardaneus

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,041
I think it’s more complex. NPR also does n want their account going to some npr super troll. Interesting to see how they will react.
So you are saying NPR should cave to the blackmail of Musk and go back to tweeting so that Musk gets what he wants. Then NPR starts dropping the poop emoji, 2 hours later they get told by Twitter/Musk that their account will be reassigned if they are not serious about using Twitter again. A day later they get told that an organization at large as them can easily fork over the cash for an org badge and all their employee accounts, if not the account will be reassigned.
That is the problem with caving to blackmail, it gives control of your life (or in this case Twitter account) to the blackmailer.

The best thing is to not cave. Worst that Musk can do is pursue a personal vendetta and ignore that Twitter at this point still defines inactive as not logging in, not as not tweeting. It will cause short term pain for NPR if a troll gets the account but long term reassigning the account will backfire spectacularly on Musk.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
32 (33 / -1)

Fatesrider

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,977
Subscriptor
Twitter doesn't have policies anymore... it has personal vendettas. NPR wouldn't be reassigned for a policy issue... it would be reassigned because Musk is angry at them and worried about those copying them. Without the tweets, there's no user base for advertisers.

It's one of the more basic mistakes Musk has made since taking over Twitter. Posters are not the customers, they are the manufacturers. They make the product (which are the readers eyes) which you sell to the customers (the advertisers).
Oh, but Musk isn't making his money from advertisers, but from idiots stupid enough to lay out $8/month for the privilege of seeing Musk's elevated ravings polluting their feeds while the reasonable and rational posters are leaving the platform in droves.

He's trying to make Twitter self sufficient off of subscriptions, which we all know will not work.

At this point, any advertisers left on Twitter are likely from companies I'd not want to do business with. Considering the increasing concentration of radicals and Nazis on the platform, what company in their right minds, except maybe Remington Arms, would want to be associated with those fuckers?
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)

thekaj

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,270
Subscriptor++
Musk couldn't embody "bully" more if he tried. First he set up a scenario to poke NPR. When they weren't having it and left, he then started trying to taunt them back to the playground so he could bully them again.

His behavior just boggles my mind. He has more wealth than he could spend in several lifetimes. Even after throwing away all the money on Twitter! He could be doing anything with his time, and this is what he chooses to do. I would almost feel sorry for him, except for all the collateral damage he does in the meantime.
IDK, a real bully can actually get others to do what they want. Musk is busy discovering that he paid $44 billion for something he thought he could use to bully people into paying attention and loving him, but instead he's watching people roll their eyes and walk away from him.

This is like the billionaire version of those ads promising weaklings who got sand kicked in their faces at the beach that they'll get strong and attract all the women if they pay for their program.
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)

steelcobra

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,774
Musk couldn't embody "bully" more if he tried. First he set up a scenario to poke NPR. When they weren't having it and left, he then started trying to taunt them back to the playground so he could bully them again.

His behavior just boggles my mind. He has more wealth than he could spend in several lifetimes. Even after throwing away all the money on Twitter! He could be doing anything with his time, and this is what he chooses to do. I would almost feel sorry for him, except for all the collateral damage he does in the meantime.
That's what happens when you cross the line from "money as a thing you use" into "money as a way of keeping score."
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)
The irony of tweeting to an audience that stopped logging into Twitter...
And despite never tweeting, I heard about it.
Because journalists treat twitter posts as press releases. It's faster and easier than waiting for a properly formatted press release on a company/country/personality's website.

If they stopped, the whole house of cards would collapse much faster.
I would like them to stop.
 
Upvote
14 (18 / -4)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
67,692
Subscriptor++
My father past away a few years ago and I was going through his stuff not too long ago. I found his Rolodex of passwords and it turns out he opened a Twitter account in 2009. He didn't post anything. He just followed a few people. It's one of the few places to find his imprint online. Sad to see it go.
If my late dad had tweeted, I'd be fine with Twitter deleting his account. He never wrote down his Facebook password, and FB wanted a copy of his death certificate to allow me to delete his account there. No, Zuck, you don't need a copy of something like that. His account is still up, almost five years later, and every now and then, people who weren't aware of his passing still post there.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)