Trump admin. announces plan to kill 2016 methane emissions limits

Status
You're currently viewing only LosAngelesPandas's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
There’s what I think is a Cree proverb that goes something like only when the last fish is caught and the last river runs dry will we realize money isn’t edible.

We’re almost there. I have to laugh at stuff like this because otherwise every fiber of my being is furious at what a joke this whole administration is. A very bad one at that.
 
Upvote
36 (37 / -1)
From the NY Times coverage of this story:
Larger energy companies have invested millions of dollars to promote natural gas as a cleaner option than coal in the nation’s power plants, because natural gas produces about half as much carbon dioxide when burned. They fear that unrestricted leaks of methane could undermine that marketing message, hurting demand.

Exxon wrote to the E.P.A. last year urging the agency to maintain core elements of the Obama-era policy. And earlier this year, Gretchen Watkins, the United States chairwoman for Shell, said the E.P.A. should impose rules “that will both regulate existing methane emissions but also future methane emissions.”

Susan Dio, the chairwoman and president of BP America, wrote an op-ed article in March saying that regulating methane is the “right thing to do for the planet” and for the natural gas industry. “To maximize the climate benefits of gas — and meet the dual challenge of producing more energy with fewer emissions — we need to address its Achilles’ heel and eliminate methane emissions,” she wrote.

When Exxon and BP are like "dude, too much"...

(see also: automakers and mileage standards)

Yeah, when the criminals running Exxon and company are telling you it’s too far, you really have become, to use one of my favorite phrases, mustache-twirlingly evil.
 
Upvote
27 (28 / -1)
From the NY Times coverage of this story:
Larger energy companies have invested millions of dollars to promote natural gas as a cleaner option than coal in the nation’s power plants, because natural gas produces about half as much carbon dioxide when burned. They fear that unrestricted leaks of methane could undermine that marketing message, hurting demand.

Exxon wrote to the E.P.A. last year urging the agency to maintain core elements of the Obama-era policy. And earlier this year, Gretchen Watkins, the United States chairwoman for Shell, said the E.P.A. should impose rules “that will both regulate existing methane emissions but also future methane emissions.”

Susan Dio, the chairwoman and president of BP America, wrote an op-ed article in March saying that regulating methane is the “right thing to do for the planet” and for the natural gas industry. “To maximize the climate benefits of gas — and meet the dual challenge of producing more energy with fewer emissions — we need to address its Achilles’ heel and eliminate methane emissions,” she wrote.

When Exxon and BP are like "dude, too much"...

(see also: automakers and mileage standards)

Yeah, when the criminals running Exxon and company are telling you it’s too far, you really have become, to use one of my favorite phrases, mustache-twirlingly evil.

Well, we do have a fucked-up version of Snidely Whiplash as POTUS...

To everyone who is aghast at this, at the whole ICE concentrations camps for brown people thing, and at everything else Trump and the GOP are currently doing: elections have consequences.

Don't like those consequences? Vote every chance you get for a candidate that will work towards everyone's best interests (and don't just blow those chances with protest votes on candidates with a snowball's chance in Hell of actually getting elected).

What happens when you always vote and don’t have a bunch of money to donate to help other places and trash like this still gets elected everywhere?
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
Status
You're currently viewing only LosAngelesPandas's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.