Tony Scott's 1986 blockbuster and the 2022 sequel are the best recruitment tools the US Navy could hope for.
See full article...
See full article...
Speaking of movies that did not age well.
I want David Suchet back but this time the villain is a diminutive fussy Belgian.No ONE has the VISION for that these days
Ze little grey cellsI want David Suchet back but this time the villain is a diminutive fussy Belgian.
Agreed! Top Gun over Iron Eagle... but Queen over Loggins!No ONE has the VISION for that these days
Yes, he was an instructor on the F-5.F-5s are the aggressor aircraft used from the mid 70s till the early 90s because its performance was close to the Mig 21.
Saw it >50 times in 1986 when I was 17. Ironically, I was in an armed forces base (CFB Petawawa) being trained for my private pilot license (through a scholarship with the Royal Canadian Air Cadets). Why that many? The cinema was the only facility with AC! We brought flashlights and studied for a few shows a day (it was also free).
Cougar (John Stockwell) and his RIO
Tom Cruise? Isn't that the scientologist grifter fucker? No thanks.
Interesting.Nobody gives a shit about Iron Eagle or Firefox anymore, no, not even you.
You lost me at Michael Bay.I take it you won't be in line for this:
Michael Bay to Direct Operation Epic Fury Rescue Film About Two Pilots Recovered From Iran
Was that because of the lights?Recently re-watched Top Gun and the thing that stood out the most was how sweaty everyone was.
It made me realize in most modern movies everyone has that powder-dry makeup look, or maybe a fake sheen.
It's how Americans like to think war looks like.
I occasionally browse r/Ukraine. Being chased by FPV drones in a forest isn't cool- even with Tom Cruise. Just terrifying.
While Top Gun is certainly not an accurate depiction of an aerial dogfight, I don't think a movie culminating in an air to air dog dogfight over the Indian Ocean in 1985 can be reasonably criticized for not depicting 21st century drone warfare on land.It's how Americans like to think war looks like.
I occasionally browse r/Ukraine. Being chased by FPV drones in a forest isn't cool- even with Tom Cruise. Just terrifying.
Fun fact: Suchet’s trademark Poirot walk was accomplished by him gripping a coin between his arse cheeks.I want David Suchet back but this time the villain is a diminutive fussy Belgian.
Yes, this is the plot of the movie. Everything Iceman tells him is correct and he has to learn some humility to overcome his own ego and his clear trauma at the death of Goose.Also, Tom Cruise's arrogant demeanor put me off. He was hard to root for.
What are the odds that it doesn’t mention the part where they had to scuttle $200 million worth of aircraft because they couldn’t take off again?I take it you won't be in line for this:
Michael Bay to Direct Operation Epic Fury Rescue Film About Two Pilots Recovered From Iran
Uh... It's the shirtless volleyball. Everyone knows that.Stunning aerial footage still best thing about Top Gun at 40
Nothing whatsoever against the writer whose work I've enjoyed here for a long time, but it's really tough to appreciate literal US military propaganda, even if it resulted in cool aerial footage, when this country is avalanching into fascism while conducting wars of aggression. This helps normalize it.
It's an availability thing. The US Navy already operated the F-5s and A-4s as aggressor aircraft, so were already available in the right locations for filming, possibly with some filming just tacked onto their normal flying assignments instead of the cost and logistics of securing access to European planes and transporting them, pilots, parts, etc. etc. to the filming location.I can't think about Top Gun without thinking about watching it with my grandfather, who had flown the T-38 and F-5 extensively, as he listed off European aircraft that would have been much more convincing adversaries than the F-5s in the film.
Although I think he would have related more to the second film as after Vietnam he really had to fight to remain in flying roles and not get stuck behind a desk in Washington or Brussels.
Looks like they're still in use in that role with a few reserve units (2 Navy, 2 Marine Corps) and one of the commercial providers of aggressor services (Tactical Air Support, Inc.)F-5s are the aggressor aircraft used from the mid 70s till the early 90s because its performance was close to the Mig 21.
Yeah, back then, at least they had a real Sheen.Recently re-watched Top Gun and the thing that stood out the most was how sweaty everyone was.
It made me realize in most modern movies everyone has that powder-dry makeup look, or maybe a fake sheen.
I remember re-watching with friends in my late teens, around 10 years after it was released? The consensus was it was a terrible movie, by people whose tastes were quite forgiving.
Honestly, I think Les Chevaliers du Ciel might have even better flying scenes than Top Gun. Mostly because this is French military proaganda, and they modified a drop tank into a camera pod, so the chase plane is another Mirage, which meant they could keep up with the other aircraft even at top speed.There aren't many films that scratch the same itch as Top Gun, but the one that comes closest is the 2005 French film Les Chevaliers du Ciel (Sky Fighters).
LOL, he's a terrible actor, as wooden as Ed Wood, always has been, always will be.Yes, that's the one. He's also often a compelling movie actor, one of the best on screen in his lifetime, even if not in Top Gun. I too am repelled by actors rendering themselves unwatchable by the sordid details of their real lives, but Cruise is good enough onscreen that it usually doesn't distract me while watching. It's more of a bad aftertaste following the movie.
Sucks. He was memorable in a lot of roles.
I only just learned that apparently the sex scene was added after the primary filming finished because test audiences thought that Top Gun was a gay movie:
View: https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1tbmlkn/whats_a_movie_sex_scene_that_genuinely_mattered/olhzsws/
Also this:
View: https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1tbmlkn/whats_a_movie_sex_scene_that_genuinely_mattered/olib86w/
My God.... it's Goose and Mav at age 16 or 17! I mean everything lines up. Light hair, dark hair, taller, shorter, the noses... only the glasses remained before the LASIK procedures (HS graduation gifts) saved their naval aviation dreams.
F-5s are the aggressor aircraft used from the mid 70s till the early 90s because its performance was close to the Mig 21.
My 13yr old daughter asked to watch Top Gun this weekend.
I've always thought the F-14 looks like a peregrine, with the way it tucks its wings for speed (stooping) and spreads them for efficiency (soaring).... Heck, I'm a private pilot and consider the F-14 aesthetically the best looking Western swing-wing. ...
Thank you!!!
Reminds me of that bit from Robin Hood: Men in Tights when Cary Elwes observes that unlike the film they’re spoofing theirs has a Robin who can speak with a real English accent.Yeah, back then, at least they had a real Sheen.
As I was trying to find a hilarious GIF of that memorable scene from the hit film Back to the Future (1985), I did learn from a site called "Ew" that Fox and Stoltz finally met again for the first time.Did he ever have hair?