This tiny EV crossover from VinFast will go on sale in the US

Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

Mondrian

Smack-Fu Master, in training
82
This is how they should have entered the US market to begin with: starting with entry level models and then building their reputation from there. Trying to jump into the market at the upper end where all the other established brands were competing was a mistake, especially for a brand new design.

Hyundai entered the us market in 1992 with the bare bones $9,000 Excel and gradually built their capabilities and reputation until now they are a top brand with well respected models like the ionic 5 and Genesis.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

TROPtastic

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,682
Subscriptor
a 20 year old Mercedes with a 400hp electric motor kit is even cooler, though

perhaps a certain number of ICE mechanics will find some cross over work doing this kind of thing
A 400hp electric motor and a battery pack that gets you ~120 miles on a good day?

Until batteries become significantly lighter and more energy dense, making ICE to pure EV conversions will be mostly about status rather than practicality, and that doesn't bode well for a cottage industry of mechanics working on conversions.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)
I might solely because the guy that is trying to create the VinFast empire is a well known asshole who is playing the usual 21st Century tech bro games complete with police thuggery and really, really sketchy finances. He is heavily debt financed and given how that is working out in a number of other fields makes me very concerned that the brand won't be around for too long.
(Reads up on Phat)
Oh. I see what you mean.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Mus Musculus Circensis

Ars Scholae Palatinae
620
Subscriptor++
I own two 20+ year old BMWs. If I didn't do most of the work myself (except tires and windshield glass), they would be wildly unaffordable.

The rule of thumb is that parts for a $60K car don't get cheaper when it's $6K used car. But few expect them to get more expensive, sometime dramatically more. As an example an oil cooling tube clip (17-20-1-712-210 for the detail oriented) used on every automatic transmission BMW from the 1980s through 2000s is a very common replacement part. After a few years it is likely to break when anything nearby is serviced, such as radiator, belts, tensioners, water pump, thermostat, etc. The clip used to be about $1 per side -- fair for handling a small plastic piece, and negligible on a repair bill. It now lists for $24.62 per mating half, randomly adding $50 to many routine service jobs.

If you DIY you can go to a boneyard, climb under a car, and grab a few from further under a car where they haven't been heat-aged. But a dealer isn't going to do that, they will replace with new and happily pocket the part mark-up.

The situation is even worse with interior trim pieces, where matching color plastic retaining 'thumbtacks' are now $10+ each. They aren't stocked by dealers, resulting in delays of days or weeks to complete service. As a DIYer you just accept that you'll need to get lucky during some future boneyard trip.
Ah, so true!

I like classic cars, and own both a Triumph Spitfire (1972) and a BMW Z3 (1998). The amount of money I've spent on both, just to maintain road-worthiness is staggering, and that's because I do most of the work myself.

The Z3 in particular fits exactly your description: any odd plastic bit costs an unbelievable amount of money. And that's if the part is available at all.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

Fatesrider

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,499
Subscriptor
Kudos on the pricing. The styling doesn't suck, either (surprised me, actually).

The range, though...

Well, on the bright side, it's probably faster charging to 80% than most EV's, but that's still going to be a problem for most Americans. Range anxiety is real, and charging times have to be VERY low to even make the notion reasonable.

For a daily commute vehicle that doesn't have to go more than 60 miles each way, and with a home with a charging unit, it's probably useful. In short, it's a niche vehicle for those who have homes and charging stations already built in.

After all, the charging stuff can add several thousand dollars to the costs, and if they're buying this for economy, that kind of blows the economy. It won't qualify for any tax credits (but at that income level, people don't make enough to GET those tax credits) since the batteries aren't sourced in the U.S.

So kind of a mixed bag there. The range is seriously sub-par even if the pricing is equally low. It may sell to the more well off who want to decarbonize, but for the average apartment dweller, folks on a fixed income and others who still need a car, but can't afford new, it's not likely to attract a lot of attention.
 
Upvote
-7 (3 / -10)

OrvGull

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,942
So kind of a mixed bag there. The range is seriously sub-par even if the pricing is equally low. It may sell to the more well off who want to decarbonize, but for the average apartment dweller, folks on a fixed income and others who still need a car, but can't afford new, it's not likely to attract a lot of attention.
I could see it filling a niche as a second car in some households. It would be tempting as a car for new driver teens if safety weren't a big question mark.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
I don't know about any of that Fatesrider. It's definitely a commuter car for people who own homes, but that isn't exactly a 'niche' market. Consider, another option for such an optional vehicle, a $7000 Honda CB500X or Royal Enfield INT650, or Kawasaki Versus 650. Americans are abnormally shy about riding two wheels, but give them four wheels for a bit more and they'll buy it up. This breaks down if the Vinfast in mid 20s.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

evan_s

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,517
Subscriptor
Kudos on the pricing. The styling doesn't suck, either (surprised me, actually).

The range, though...

Well, on the bright side, it's probably faster charging to 80% than most EV's, but that's still going to be a problem for most Americans. Range anxiety is real, and charging times have to be VERY low to even make the notion reasonable.

For a daily commute vehicle that doesn't have to go more than 60 miles each way, and with a home with a charging unit, it's probably useful. In short, it's a niche vehicle for those who have homes and charging stations already built in.

After all, the charging stuff can add several thousand dollars to the costs, and if they're buying this for economy, that kind of blows the economy. It won't qualify for any tax credits (but at that income level, people don't make enough to GET those tax credits) since the batteries aren't sourced in the U.S.

So kind of a mixed bag there. The range is seriously sub-par even if the pricing is equally low. It may sell to the more well off who want to decarbonize, but for the average apartment dweller, folks on a fixed income and others who still need a car, but can't afford new, it's not likely to attract a lot of attention.

Charger installation costs can vary quite a bit but for something like this L1 charging is probably pretty reasonable. You really don't want to be driving it 100+ miles a day because if that's what you need it will get frustrating sooner rather than later. You can probably pretty reasonably add at least 30 miles of range a night just on L1 charging. More if you can plug it in as soon as you get home and let it charge for 12+ hours. You could probably even handle a daily commute a bit longer than that by letting it slowly drain over the week as long as you could fairly consistently let it catch up over the weekend. Having said that, home L2 charging would certainly be nice. Personally, we spent almost 2 months using L1 charging after we got our Leaf and just got our L2 charger installed last week. After power company rebate it will have cost us $500 for the charger and install. If the 30% federal credit gets extended into 2024 that would drop down to $250. That's far less than the several thousand you suggest. Admittedly, we didn't need a service upgrade to accommodate the charger and it is right next to our main panel since it's in the garage so you can't get much cheaper without doing it yourself. But that's the problem with generalizing when situations can vary a lot.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

mobby_6kl

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,127
A 400hp electric motor and a battery pack that gets you ~120 miles on a good day?

Until batteries become significantly lighter and more energy dense, making ICE to pure EV conversions will be mostly about status rather than practicality, and that doesn't bode well for a cottage industry of mechanics working on conversions.
Realistically cost is the biggest issue imo. If I could get even 80hp and 120 miles of range by EV-swapping my Fit, it'd be a very useful vehicle for daily use around the city. The problem is that such a conversion costs like $40k which is pretty silly unless it's for a hobby project


View: https://youtu.be/dXCTXxL5lr0?t=477
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

OrvGull

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,942
Realistically cost is the biggest issue imo. If I could get even 80hp and 120 miles of range by EV-swapping my Fit, it'd be a very useful vehicle for daily use around the city. The problem is that such a conversion costs like $40k which is pretty silly unless it's for a hobby project


View: https://youtu.be/dXCTXxL5lr0?t=477

I've had the same thought about my Del Sol, especially since no one really makes an EV convertible. But it's just not cost effective.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

vnangia

Ars Scholae Palatinae
824
I use a Leaf as my daily commuter car. Any issues regarding range, charging speed and so on are almost completely irrelevant for me (and for most commuters).

If this is a reliable vehicle, it may well tick all the boxes for a lot of people looking for a second vehicle for their commute or shopping. Just like the Nissan is selling every Sakura they can build in Japan, for much the same use case.

This is 100 percent my use case. We don’t need a second car 80 percent of days; the 20 percent of days we need it, we REALLY need it and it ends up being a scheduling nightmare — these aren’t bikeable distances, and public transit would mean a straightforward 18-20 minute drive would be ~2+ hours each way, with significant walking and crossing of stroads. I really, really wanted a cheap Honda e to come to the US, but it wasn’t to be.

Let’s hope VinFast doesn’t do any stupid pricing shit with a rentable battery that costs 8x the base car, like their other offering. Offer it for $18-20k, all-in, no stupid battery rental subscription, and it’ll sell like hotcakes.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,067
Subscriptor
This is 100 percent my use case. We don’t need a second car 80 percent of days; the 20 percent of days we need it, we REALLY need it and it ends up being a scheduling nightmare — these aren’t bikeable distances, and public transit would mean a straightforward 18-20 minute drive would be ~2+ hours each way, with significant walking and crossing of stroads. I really, really wanted a cheap Honda e to come to the US, but it wasn’t to be.

Let’s hope VinFast doesn’t do any stupid pricing shit with a rentable battery that costs 8x the base car, like their other offering. Offer it for $18-20k, all-in, no stupid battery rental subscription, and it’ll sell like hotcakes.
It may be a workable solution for you personally, but I am extremely skeptical that it will sell like hotcakes. Stretch it and give it four doors, then we might be getting somewhere, but it's too compromised even for a bare-bones second commuter - I could absolutely make the range work, and did with my i3, but if you've got kids under 13, it's strongly recommended they ride in the back seat. Without the ability to easily drop kids off at school, I dunno, man.
 
Upvote
-2 (1 / -3)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,067
Subscriptor
So kind of a mixed bag there. The range is seriously sub-par even if the pricing is equally low. It may sell to the more well off who want to decarbonize, but for the average apartment dweller, folks on a fixed income and others who still need a car, but can't afford new, it's not likely to attract a lot of attention.
I tend to concur. Really limited range and two doors cuts a LOT of buyers out. And at that price point, it's competing with a whole lot of used Bolts and i3s and Leafs that are significantly more capable - even the Leaf.
 
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)

m0nckywrench

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,721
Since the car is so cheap i predict many will just be run it until it dies even if the brakes worn out and tires are bald. Almost like the Yugo.
I see no problem since someone will snap up used ones to play with. A vehicle need not succeed for those who manufacturer it to be useful to techies and cheap acquire then modify. As with Harbor Freight tools etc perfect is not much competition to good enough.

If I bought a Tesla or F-150 lemon I'd be irate because in their price range lemons are unacceptable.
If I buy a used broken shitbox I expect to wrench on it as I expect to repair and modify my scrounged computers, machine tools and other used equipment. As these arrive happy content creators will tear them down and gearheads will learn what makes them tick.

If the maker wants market share they will choose to evolve. I've lived through the (short because they hustled) early Japanese shitbox motorbike era, the early US econoshitbox era in the 1980s, the ongoing Creality printer shitbox era (which spawned an aftermarket and mod community to sort them out) etc. The low end POV market is extensive and any BEV market penetration is good news.

I suggest any Arsians who get to drive one send constructive critiques to the company because they need informed feedback to improve. If they fail to listen oh well, but friendly feedback is no disservice.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

ExPatCA

Ars Scholae Palatinae
945
Subscriptor++
They've been pushing Vinfast hard at the Canadian National Exhibition the last couple of years, but I've only seen one in the wild so far.
I miss the CNE. I remember as a kid being able to go through the food building and basically eating for free from all the samples.

Then off to the Better Living Centre.

Conklin midway and the Flyer. A concert at the grandstand and then the Kochman Hell Drivers.

We used to get a free entry pass from school.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Random_stranger

Ars Praefectus
5,501
Subscriptor
"the Vietnamese automaker was founded in 2017 and only brought its first car to these shores last year. That was the very underwhelming VF8, a midsize crossover EV that wasn't fully baked by the time a bunch of journalists, Ars included, got to drive it."

Unless there was a follow-up for the VF8 where the "not fully baked" issues were all addressed, then is it reasonable to guess that this one will also likely be "not fully baked"?

[edit] And if so, is this article a bit premature?

Hey, we all suffer from premature publication from time to time.. :)
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

m0nckywrench

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,721
So I should give VinFast somewhere between 10-20 years before I expect them to have their shit together?
There is little reason not to put off discretionary buys of unproven consumer good. I let others with money to burn beta test.
I might solely because the guy that is trying to create the VinFast empire is a well known asshole who is playing the usual 21st Century tech bro games complete with police thuggery and really, really sketchy finances.
Offshore thuggery is of little interest to US consumers (Ars is a tiny niche group). If he keeps his games on the DL and confined to his local sphere of influence he could do well. If not someone else will fill the gap.
 
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)

JesusInBeta

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
100
Fun fact, the styling was actually done externally. It looks like it was done by an Australian consultancy (who are literally within walking distance of me)!

https://www.carsales.com.au/editori...ric-ute-and-suv-designed-in-australia-144054/
Pretty much everything comes out of Vinfast are "done externally": Indian platform, Chinese parts, outsourced designs. The company has no real R&D capacity and the owners controls over 99% of the shares, the whole thing reeks of fraud.
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)

OrvGull

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,942
Offshore thuggery is of little interest to US consumers (Ars is a tiny niche group). If he keeps his games on the DL and confined to his local sphere of influence he could do well. If not someone else will fill the gap.
My main concern is that someone who is getting their government to suppress criticism of their product is probably not interested in improving it.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

slogger

Ars Scholae Palatinae
627
I think giving the price in their home country may be a disservice to everyone. The price here won't be that low, likely. When the US is announced it'll be higher than "expected" which turns people away.

If you're interested because you're thinking $12K, but then it starts at $20K, you won't get one. But maybe you would have been interested at $20K, if only your expectations hadn't been set unreasonably low.
Not really. I'd be happy with something like this for $12k, and even happier if it were slightly more like an electric kei truck. At $20k I'd have to question why I wouldn't just pay $5k more and get on the waiting list for a Maverick.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

ERIFNOMI

Ars Legatus Legionis
18,134
Charger installation costs can vary quite a bit but for something like this L1 charging is probably pretty reasonable. You really don't want to be driving it 100+ miles a day because if that's what you need it will get frustrating sooner rather than later. You can probably pretty reasonably add at least 30 miles of range a night just on L1 charging. More if you can plug it in as soon as you get home and let it charge for 12+ hours. You could probably even handle a daily commute a bit longer than that by letting it slowly drain over the week as long as you could fairly consistently let it catch up over the weekend. Having said that, home L2 charging would certainly be nice. Personally, we spent almost 2 months using L1 charging after we got our Leaf and just got our L2 charger installed last week. After power company rebate it will have cost us $500 for the charger and install. If the 30% federal credit gets extended into 2024 that would drop down to $250. That's far less than the several thousand you suggest. Admittedly, we didn't need a service upgrade to accommodate the charger and it is right next to our main panel since it's in the garage so you can't get much cheaper without doing it yourself. But that's the problem with generalizing when situations can vary a lot.
You're replying to a repeat EV FUDster. By all means go for it, but just know what you're getting into. Since EVs aren't immediate drop in replacements for ICEVs without changing a single damn way of thinking, he won't be convinced. Even if they were, he'd probably bitch about not having to do oil changes anymore.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

NicoNicoRose

Smack-Fu Master, in training
45
I do wish people badmouthing range will remember that some of us have commutes under 10 miles and don't need or want $100,000 EVs that go so fast they become menaces on the city streets we live in. A cheap and cheerful EV with 125 miles of range is more than enough for me and would make a great second car to our eight-year-old Spark.
 
Upvote
0 (4 / -4)

rb1971

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
128
Subscriptor
Man, wanna know how I know I'm getting old? A friend is restoring an early-70s Porsche and when he did the first start of the recently rebuilt engine, my second thought was "Jesus christ the fumes are noxious"
I have a 69 Fiat Jolly and a 74 BMW CSi. Both smell terrible in operation. I love old cars but there's no denying how much worse they were environmentally.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
I would not be so sure. A car is a status symbol. Where I live people prefer 20 year old Mercedes to a brand new car at the same price
Which do you think would be a more comfortable and pleasant ride, a used well-maintained Mercedes/Cadillac/Audi/Volvo, or a brand new Chevy Spark?

Don’t assume that preferences for nicer, more refined cars are automatically about status. Nicer cars are usually more pleasant to spend time in.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

TROPtastic

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,682
Subscriptor
Realistically cost is the biggest issue imo. If I could get even 80hp and 120 miles of range by EV-swapping my Fit, it'd be a very useful vehicle for daily use around the city. The problem is that such a conversion costs like $40k which is pretty silly unless it's for a hobby project


View: https://youtu.be/dXCTXxL5lr0?t=477

Excellent point. After thinking about it, my perception of EV-swapping as status-driven is mainly because of its high cost. If it was 10x cheaper, there would be >>10x the number of conversions being done.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
Building a city car that can sell for under $20k at a profit shouldn't be that hard. City cars don't need huge range, lane departure warning, adaptive cruise control, or most of the other wizzbang sh!t manufacturers add to justify high prices. Power windows, power locks, A/C - heat, physical buttons for controls, a third party Android Auto/Apple Carplay head unit, LFP battery good for 150 miles. Done.
 
Upvote
-3 (1 / -4)

vnangia

Ars Scholae Palatinae
824
It may be a workable solution for you personally, but I am extremely skeptical that it will sell like hotcakes. Stretch it and give it four doors, then we might be getting somewhere, but it's too compromised even for a bare-bones second commuter - I could absolutely make the range work, and did with my i3, but if you've got kids under 13, it's strongly recommended they ride in the back seat. Without the ability to easily drop kids off at school, I dunno, man.

Well, yeah, I mean, I’d like to get a used i3, but of the 44 used i3s in a 250mi radius of me, 28 have a REX, which I don’t want; 12 of the 16 are either older than 2014 or have over 100k miles; and the remaining 4 are above $22k price — which is spitting distance of a new base Bolt, if they still existed. This, potentially with a one-day lease, could be as low as $12.5k net of EV incentive, and totally fine for our specific use-case, which is “one adult needs to be at a doctor’s appointment for themselves or with a parent.”

I wish I could get a used Bolt, but given how badly Chevy flubbed the response to their exploding battery problem, most of them have branded titles and thus no one will lend us money for it — you just don’t know if you’re getting a Bolt with a brand new battery or one with their “software” fix.
 
Upvote
0 (3 / -3)

StuiWooi

Ars Scholae Palatinae
812
My very first thought was "that's looks just like a Jimmy" so pleased to see it was shouted out. I'd consider getting one, if they came to Europe too - a VF3 that is... Though judging by the number of Jimmys I saw on a visit to Iceland just before the eruption fears started getting bad they're probably a decent car too!
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

NetMage

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,248
I would seriously consider this as a second commuter car for my family. It makes no sense that we drive a V6 Audi powered by dinosaur juice ~10km each way every day. In-city errands and commuting is the sweet spot for a sub-$20k simple EV like this.
It makes no sense to convert from $40/month in gas to a car payment per month (assuming the Audi is paid for) or to wait 27 years for an economical payback.

Assuming manufactured price is related to CO2 burden (probably less so for an Audi) you are being much worse for your pocket and the environment doing so.
 
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)

mobby_6kl

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,127
Building a city car that can sell for under $20k at a profit shouldn't be that hard. City cars don't need huge range, lane departure warning, adaptive cruise control, or most of the other wizzbang sh!t manufacturers add to justify high prices. Power windows, power locks, A/C - heat, physical buttons for controls, a third party Android Auto/Apple Carplay head unit, LFP battery good for 150 miles. Done.
Maybe not, but the question is why get a 2-seater with limited range for $20k when you can get a Bolt or a used Tesla for not much more that wouldn't be as limiting. Yes it's smaller but it still needs a parking space, insurance, charger access, etc.
 
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)

georges

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,146
Subscriptor++
It makes no sense to convert from $40/month in gas to a car payment per month (assuming the Audi is paid for) or to wait 27 years for an economical payback.

Assuming manufactured price is related to CO2 burden (probably less so for an Audi) you are being much worse for your pocket and the environment doing so.
Gas is more expensive where I am than where you are, I think, but finances aren't the only consideration. It would be a second car and would cut our household emissions quite a bit.
Assuming manufactured price is related to CO2 burden
Not sure you can assume that.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)