The US is betting on AI to catch insider trading in prediction markets

MilanKraft

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,934
"The company [PolyMarket] did not respond to WIRED’s request for comments...."

Almost always code for: "our representative won't be able to look your reporter in the eye and tell them we're not cutting ethical corners... also our lawyers told us never to talk to anyone in the press except through press releases."

As far as it goes, some enforcement of these shady-as-fork platforms is better than none. But we know what "enforcement" will mean with this Administration: "if we find that regular citizens or low level officials somewhere in the government or military have made money this way, we'll expose them, prosecute, and thump our chest... if someone higher up in government or among our tech bro homies is found gaming the system, you won't hear about it because that's different, bro."
 
Upvote
106 (106 / 0)

ArcaneTourist

Ars Praetorian
500
Subscriptor
The prediction market house never loses. The customers gamblers who won aren't taking money from the house. They're taking money from losers who had a contract go down in value lost a bet.

A casino (which pays out its own money) has incentive to catch cheaters. These prediction markets have incentive to encourage as much betting as possible. The only incentives for prediction markets to police bad actors are (1) threat by governments and (2) the bulk of the gamblers deciding that the game is rigged and they'd be fools to play.

I predict that the grift will continue.
 
Upvote
105 (105 / 0)

angleiron

Ars Centurion
282
Subscriptor
Who’s to say it won’t actually BE AI doing the insider trading? Remember that instance of Claude that broke out and mined bitcoin? Now imagine all of the Accenture consultants that a year ago had never even written of a prompt running integrations at F500 companies that crawl all over those databases.
 
Upvote
14 (15 / -1)

Hypatia

Ars Centurion
260
Subscriptor
While the company’s CEO, Shayne Coplan, had talked in the past about why insider trading could be good for prediction markets, Polymarket changed its approach this spring, updating its market integrity rules and announcing a partnership with Palantir for its US-based sports markets (the Chainalysis deal focuses on the offshore platform).
What’s the problem with a little insider trading between genocides, right friends?

/s (obviously)

The Cartoonish League of Evil (CLE) continues to produce stories nobody would believe if it weren’t happening in full view. Just imagine what they’re doing behind the fence.
 
Upvote
30 (30 / 0)

AlbatrossMoss

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
103
Subscriptor
You’ve got so much data,” Selig says. “When we feed it into AI, we get really great information. It can help us understand things, like where we might want to investigate, or when we might need to send a subpoena to a trader.”
You have to admire how widespread it has become to appear to have concrete facts behind ridiculously non-specific words.

Feed the data into AI? Okay, which type of AI? There's at least ten subdomains of AI that could be relevant here, but they're somewhat non-overlapping. And feed... How? How do you represent the data?

And what "really great information" you get out of it? Be specific, give an example.

Oh, right. You don't know what you're talking about, but "AI is cool today, so let me talk out of my ass to sound smart. Plebs don't know shit anyway."
 
Upvote
72 (73 / -1)

ArcaneTourist

Ars Praetorian
500
Subscriptor
You have to admire how widespread it has become to appear to have concrete facts behind ridiculously non-specific words.

Feed the data into AI? Okay, which type of AI? There's at least ten subdomains of AI that could be relevant here, but they're somewhat non-overlapping. And feed... How? How do you represent the data?

And what "really great information" you get out of it? Be specific, give an example.

Oh, right. You don't know what you're talking about, but "AI is cool today, so let me talk out of my ass to sound smart. Plebs don't know shit anyway."

Yeah, it has to be AI. Because statistical analysis and non-AI heuristics (such as customer makes very few bets and always wins big) aren't things.

/s
 
Upvote
56 (56 / 0)
This a few days after a story in which another US regulator fined a trust $1.5M for Musk doing almost exactly the same thing.

If this does anything at all it certainly won't apply to Trump and his supporters. Or they'll be pardoned anyway.

86 47

Er, it's a bit worse than that. The SEC is trying to allow Musk to settle a $150 million court case for $1.5 million via a trust. The judge involved is wondering if this is corrupt and hasn't quite allowed it just yet though,
 
Upvote
43 (43 / 0)
The whole concept of Prediction Markets seems to me to be the plot of trying to generate Insider Trading. Why would anyone gamble gobs of money on absolutely rando stuff unless they had some kind of inside knowledge about it in the first place?
People go to casinos all the time and bet gobs of money on random rolls of dice or deals of cards, even when they know that the house has a big edge, and even when they have no insider knowledge.

Yes, the prediction markets will attract those with insider knowledge because the insider knowledge reduces the gambling aspect of the bet and reduces the randomness.
 
Upvote
20 (21 / -1)
People go to casinos all the time and bet gobs of money on random rolls of dice or deals of cards, even when they know that the house has a big edge, and even when they have no insider knowledge.

Yes, the prediction markets will attract those with insider knowledge because the insider knowledge reduces the gambling aspect of the bet and reduces the randomness.

And, people who think they have insider knowledge because they've quote "figured it out".

There's plenty of examples of people who think they've figured out a winning move when they haven't. One of the most fun examples is that study after study has shown that 90% of professional money managers underperform the S&P 500. The two guys behind the Motley Fool famously testified about this to congress decades ago. [ And, my 401K thanks them for the suggestion a few decades ago of maxing out 401K contributions and putting it all on a S&P 500 index. ]

TL;DR - There's an unending supply of fools.
 
Upvote
34 (34 / 0)

RZetopan

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,203
If there's one thing AI reliably delivers, it's what we already knew.
Not always. Putting glue on pizza toppings and eating rocks for your health don't seem to be widely known before the glorified autocomplete AI came up with those and similar "solutions".
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)
Not always. Putting glue on pizza toppings and eating rocks for your health don't seem to be widely known before the glorified autocomplete AI came up with those and similar "solutions".

We already had words, salad and even word salad. Those AI generated examples strongly resemble word salad. A more mixed up salad is still salad.

Happily, that's my dose of salad for today, I'm going to go have some pizza (hold the glue).
 
Last edited:
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)