There's a pretty expansive national security exception to the TRIPS treaty so I wouldn't get too excited about the WTO getting involved.
https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_09_e.htm
Article 73 specifically.
My point was that it's not just an amplifier of capability and progress, but also quite simply a reducer of cost. The concept of comparative advantage shows us that both sides come out ahead by applying their efforts where they have a comparative advantage, and then trading the excess production (above what they need domestically) with each other.The USA, arguably the richest and most capable country in the world, cannot build a entirely domestically sourced sophisticated product. Global cooperation is such a huge amplifier of capability and progress that non-participation isn't even worth serious consideration. But apparently it is being considered in Russia.
I don't see anything about a Google account, Gmail account, Google maps, or the app store here: https://www.android.com/intl/en_ca/what-is-android/Android isn't just an O/S. It's suite of applications that requires a a Google account to operate. You can copy the O/S but that won't give you access to your Gmail account, Google maps or access to the app store
For the 4th time in this thread. That's no good to you if you loose the ability to use Googles services that require an account. So if you loose Gmail you loose all your existing email. Hint reading and logic are a thingI don't see anything about a Google account, Gmail account, Google maps, or the app store here: https://www.android.com/intl/en_ca/what-is-android/
There's absolutely no way Russia can build a fab that can build 12nm. Selling them a lithography machine is blocked by sanctions and creating the ability to manufacture a lithography machine is decades of work.China is now fabbing RISC-V chips that are plenty fast enough for a smart phone. eg the Leapfive NB2. It's 12 nanometer but so what? Russia could probably license the design and fab it locally eventually.
But lets face it they'll just buy chinese made complete phones off the big manufacturers, rebadge them and replace the play store with the Russian one.
By Tom's Hardware: last April, one of the short-term goals was to ramp up Russian chip production in 90nm fabrication technology by the end of 2022 and a longer-term goal was to establish manufacturing using a 28nm node by 2030. So yeah, not quite 12nm ready there yet.There's absolutely no way Russia can build a fab that can build 12nm. Selling them a lithography machine is blocked by sanctions and creating the ability to manufacture a lithography machine is decades of work.
Everybody now just makes sure the phones pass thrpigh Armenia or another country that trades with Russia and that makes iPhones and Samsungs still very available there. Not mentioning that reality makes this a shallow article. ...
..., but there is no problem with getting consumer electronics in Russia
It's not that we can't, we don't choose to organize that way. It is entirely a matter of philosophy - caring more about efficiency than self-sufficiency. Change the philosophy and change the options.The USA, arguably the richest and most capable country in the world, cannot build a entirely domestically sourced sophisticated product. Global cooperation is such a huge amplifier of capability and progress that non-participation isn't even worth serious consideration. But apparently it is being considered in Russia.
To paraphrase Stephen Colbert: "Is powered by potato."We need to keep a close eye on this; there's a chance we might get to see the world's first smartphone powered by coal...
And that was with now sanctioned western sourced suppliers.By Tom's Hardware: last April, one of the short-term goals was to ramp up Russian chip production in 90nm fabrication technology by the end of 2022 and a longer-term goal was to establish manufacturing using a 28nm node by 2030. So yeah, not quite 12nm ready there yet.
They'll be powered by vodka.To paraphrase Stephen Colbert: "Is powered by potato."
I do like the coal powered alternative. Maybe the Pro models will be powered by coal?
I predict the top app will be: "Am I too high in building?"Russian gov uses Russian apps to track and keep a close eye on its citizens you can bet this phone now bring that in OS level. Why is that bad? Well people who have challenged Kremlin or even simply achieved business success (you can guess who gets all the money when they die) have a strange habit of falling out of windows.
No, they do not claim that. At all. Even the [Chinese] source you posted there says:China has its own lithography machines that they claim can do 10 nm.
also applies to advanced weapons, though there are strong geopolitical incentives that influence who makes what parts, few of the more advanced weapons systems are completely produced in a single country. For example the Stryker Mortar Carrier uses an Israeli mortar system, Javelin and NLAW use parts made across NATO and MNNAs and so onMy point was that it's not just an amplifier of capability and progress, but also quite simply a reducer of cost. The concept of comparative advantage shows us that both sides come out ahead by applying their efforts where they have a comparative advantage, and then trading the excess production (above what they need domestically) with each other.
Just to be clear, the simple economics-textbook examples of comparative advantage tend to result in country A making product X and country B making product Y. We look around the world and see that it doesn't really work that way. In the real world, the optimization function is simply more complex than those simple textbook examples, but still works in the same underlying manner. In the real world, the comparative advantage might result in both countries making some of each product, but not in the same proportion that they consume the product, such that they end up trading the excess with each other.
also you'd think they'd focus what fab capability they have on import substitution for military systems, not on cellphones.There's absolutely no way Russia can build a fab that can build 12nm. Selling them a lithography machine is blocked by sanctions and creating the ability to manufacture a lithography machine is decades of work.
I believe Anatoly Chubais was in charge of the previous "russian phone". Or it may have been the first domestic CPU. Either way, the project went nowhere, and Chubais himself already peaced out to Israel.If it was something that Russia could steal, maybe it would work. But I have doubts about their ability to actually build anything. Corruption and graft will cripple every aspect of this project from design to software to production. It won’t be that they can’t make something, it’ll be someone’s desire to make an extra ruble or two that’ll tank this.
Yeah, Chinese companies basically need to choose between being able to sell their advanced electronics in the West, or getting sanctioned and thus being limited to the Chinese and Russian markets. They can sell on the black market with the former but there is a risk and it's necessarily lower volume. But that doesn't work for something as massive as a lithography machine. Also, isn't China still reliant on ASML for even remotely advanced processes?There's absolutely no way Russia can build a fab that can build 12nm. Selling them a lithography machine is blocked by sanctions and creating the ability to manufacture a lithography machine is decades of work.
Exactly. Both that they are multi-nationally sourced and that they aren’t sourced from current/likely adversaries. It’s one of the reasons weapons systems are more expensive than they “seem” like they should be. They’re not made on Foxconn assembly lines in Guangzhou. (Before anyone starts lecturing me, no… it’s far from the only reason.)also applies to advanced weapons, though there are strong geopolitical incentives that influence who makes what parts, few of the more advanced weapons systems are completely produced in a single country. For example the Stryker Mortar Carrier uses an Israeli mortar system, Javelin and NLAW use parts made across NATO and MNNAs and so on
Someday, the war in Ukraine will end. So when Russia finally surrenders, so as to resume normal relations with the rest of the world, then they will get sued. So, either they can get sued, or they will be doomed forever to live in a Russia denied access to the rest of the world's technology.And what exactly will Google be able to do to enforce the terms of their license in Russia? Threaten to exit Russia? Sue them (in Russia)?
it also spreads out the development cost burden, and allows countries to specialize based on what their MIC is configured for, allowing the leveraging of economies of scale, with a larger reliable customer base, that's how the F-35A cost can be lower than contemporary 4.5 gen fightersExactly. Both that they are multi-nationally sourced and that they aren’t sourced from current/likely adversaries. It’s one of the reasons weapons systems are more expensive than they “seem” like they should be. They’re not made on Foxconn assembly lines in Guangzhou. (Before anyone starts lecturing me, no… it’s far from the only reason.)
How on earth can this reply be downvoted?You laugh, but potato battery is thing. And when depleted, instead of sending to some far off land to be recycled, you just make vodka!
Russian smart!
Even if they somehow got magicked a possibly working 22 nm lithography machine into Moscow, would they be even able to use it? A lithography machine is not a whole fab – and as I understand it, the higher you go in resolution, the more faster all the other process purity problems, chemical purity problems, clean room problems etc. do really mount up quickly.[...]
Even if Russia somehow got lithography equipment for a relatively modern process, I doubt they'd be able to use it effectively. They've been failing at building an indigenous 65 nm fab for over a decade, and the yields on their 90 nm fab suck despite buying all the equipment from ST over a decade ago. Kleptocracies aren't very good for building extremely complex things.
The countries that were at war with nazi Germany didn't trade with them. But that wasn't all countries, Sweden, Switzerland, Finland etc traded with Nazi Germany (well, until 1943-44 or so). Oh, and the US traded with Nazi Germany until they declared war, too.I keep being astonished when the sanctions against Russia are listed. Phones under $300 aren't banned? I would think that by now sanctions against Russia should be simple and comprehensive. The full force of the Trading with the Enemy Act, or its equivalent, should apply in every Western nation. If you couldn't export it to Nazi Germany in 1942 from an Allied nation, you shouldn't be able to export it to Russia now. There's a war on, in case people lhave forgotten.
Even if they somehow got magicked a possibly working 22 nm lithography machine into Moscow, would they be even able to use it? A lithography machine is not a whole fab – and as I understand it, the higher you go in resolution, the more faster all the other process purity problems, chemical purity problems, clean room problems etc. do really mount up quickly.
Training workers and the whole supply chain from pretty sketchy yields on 90 nm to good yields on hypothetical 22 nm might be a decade or more – especially if your best young tech people are long gone, escaping draft to Georgia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, etc, while the remaining supply chain is heavily prone to corruption or even still random drafts to the meat‑grinder...
And strongman Xi just suddenly deciding to send over a whole subsidised fab factory with thousands of skilled Chinese workers, its own supply chain direct from China and all that? It seems a bit unlikely. Especially since Xi has its own plans for the "Northern China" territories (read Vladivostok, Khabarovsk and even further), should Russia ever hick up considerably...
Black market“There's still a lot of competition,” says Counterpoint’s Stryjak. “I don't think there's a huge gap in the market for a new player.”
I don’t understand this analysts assumption that the Russian market is free enough that regular competition theory holds. Can’t Russia quite easily impose import restrictions (tariffs, quotas, bans) targeted to shift purchases to homespun versions? Notions of competition and product equivalence seem fanciful to me. Am I missing something here?
Well it could… but it would require spinning up a lot of old nasty resource extraction. It chooses not to, and ceded other industries to international partners, but it could still return to them.The USA, arguably the richest and most capable country in the world, cannot build a entirely domestically sourced sophisticated product. Global cooperation is such a huge amplifier of capability and progress that non-participation isn't even worth serious consideration. But apparently it is being considered in Russia.
I wonder if some of these old accounts posting garbage have been stolen. A lot of that over at slashdot.China has its own lithography machines that they claim can do 10 nm.
http://www.tbcoer.com/en/new/new-43-290.html
Oh what is the name of that space idle/puzzle game based on potato tech?How on earth can this reply be downvoted?
You mean xeihai and xeiing?Even if they somehow got magicked a possibly working 22 nm lithography machine into Moscow, would they be even able to use it? A lithography machine is not a whole fab – and as I understand it, the higher you go in resolution, the more faster all the other process purity problems, chemical purity problems, clean room problems etc. do really mount up quickly.
Training workers and the whole supply chain from pretty sketchy yields on 90 nm to good yields on hypothetical 22 nm might be a decade or more – especially if your best young tech people are long gone, escaping draft to Georgia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, etc, while the remaining supply chain is heavily prone to corruption or even still random drafts to the meat‑grinder...
And strongman Xi just suddenly deciding to send over a whole subsidised fab factory with thousands of skilled Chinese workers, its own supply chain direct from China and all that? It seems a bit unlikely. Especially since Xi has its own plans for the "Northern China" territories (read Vladivostok, Khabarovsk and even further), should Russia ever hick up considerably...