The Nokia Lumia 900 review

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Nokia Lumia 900 has the weight of two technology behemoths and Windows Phone fans on its polycarbonate shoulders. Ars sees if the flagship smartphone can do them all proud.

<a href='http://meincmagazine.com/gadgets/reviews/2012/04/the-nokia-lumia-900-review.ars'>Read the whole story</a>
 

Chikahiro

Ars Praefectus
3,612
Subscriptor
runsch":esh9tq6u said:
Just recieved my phone, AT&T has removed Nokia Drive and Maps.

I'll be returning the phone, as this was the one item in my mind that set it above others.
If you go to the Marketplace, Nokia should have its own category. It might be in there (ie, available for download versus installed by default). While not a factor for me, I hope its there for you!
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Chikahiro

Ars Praefectus
3,612
Subscriptor
Walt French":13z6cf47 said:
Chikahiro":13z6cf47 said:
…having multiple core hardware might not make sense right now if the OS can't handle it or it isn't officially supported by MS.
I'm personally not familiar enough with how iOS does things, so if you'd like to go into more detail, I'd appreciate it. To be honest, while iOS and Android aren't really my tastes, I feel that right now the overall platforms available are pretty good.
This all seems very reasonable and informative. I think many are concerned that the 900 is planned for near-instant obsolescence. I certainly expect that WP8 will be able to use multi-core hardware; its inter-app communication feature would seem to benefit from plenty of RAM and having a relatively slow browser is just shooting yourself in the foot in 2012. And given that Microsoft is pretty hardcore about minimum requirements for WP7, I don't see how they're going to try putting power-hungry WP8 features onto a machine with as modest specs as the 900.

While the phone meets reasonable expectations, it seems pretty clearly designed to support ZERO growth in those expectations. Today, you can edit a video on your phone & slap it onto Facebook pretty quickly. People do that, and like it, but it's not competitive on this device. More CPU would make it possible; more RAM would likely, too. Maybe Microsoft can speed up IE just by software, but that speedup will be aimed at WP8, so even if it comes to WP7, it might be architected primarily to benefit from multiple CPU cores and just not help much on this phone. Ditto, if other phones have a fair amount of raw CPU, game designers will have to put a fair amount of time into tweaking a design for WP that preserves the play features and view; that means fewer quality products. And all these in turn spell a vicious circle of weak apps, few customers, low demand, low profit incentive for everybody. That can starve a platform, but fast.
Those are perfectly legitimate concerns, and really good ones at that. I do believe Microsoft needs to publicly address this, although its possible that the lackluster performance of WP7 has given carriers and OEMs more leverage to use against them. As such, while I'd love to see an Apple-like upgrade (everyone gets it), we might see a worst-case Android upgrade (ie, OEMs and carriers decide that the best way to upgrade is to get a new phone).

As for hardware/power, Nokia (and assumedly other OEMs) are asking Microsoft to allow them to make lower-power/cost handsets, so I would hope/expect that WP8 won't be significantly more power-hungry than WP7. The trick will come in how to handle the marketplace - can you see what you can't satisfactorily run? Personally, I'm pretty happy with performance all around, but it could be better (Donpachi Maximum can get intense at times)... I'm personally wondering if OEMs and MS want to go for the high-end or go for mid range and lower phones. I wouldn't want a low to mid range Android, necessarily (paranoia, I'm sure there are great handsets values there), but I'm not sure if I'd want a high-end WP7 phone (ie, $200+), either. So, for the average user (which I'm guessing I'm sorta?), a Windows Phone might be a good alternative to some of the Android handsets out there, but on the high end I don't think so.

Certainly, I'd give my mom a WP7 long before I gave her an Android, and would prefer it to an iPhone simply because the Start screen is so simple.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
D

Deleted member 14629

Guest
runsch":3icjxgvg said:
looked in marketplace, spoke with Nokia and AT&T - they confirmed the Nokia apps are restricted.

Misleading considering that the phone in this article is AT&T branded.

This is not accurate. I have AT&T and have all the Nokia apps installed, and they work just fine. First thing I did was uninstall all the AT&T crap (except the account tracker), and install the Nokia crap. Works a treat, especially the locally stored maps for Nokia Drive.

Speaking of, I have it and it's been rather fast. Of course, it should be compared to my HD7, it's got 40% more CPU speed on a newer architecture. ;)

I'm rather peeved that AT&T turned off tethering for any data plans below 5GB, though.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

runsch

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
181
Subscriptor
I've been on the phone with AT&T for over an hour today, and chatted with Nokia - i've been told by both that it is restricted.

This item aside, the phone is fantastic - i've used Android and Symbian in the past, wasn't sure about moving to WP7, but everything works great.

I hope that I'm being misled by customer service, I want to keep this phone
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

runsch

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
181
Subscriptor
Also - i'm sure the Drive/Maps will get cleared up during the full release of the phone, i may have a different build or something along those lines.

Assuming the map item is an error, this phone is great - benchmarks are fine, but the user experience is where it counts, and WP7 delivers a great one

I also have a Samsung Focus in the house, and have been very impressed at the level of performance compared to phones with more impressive specs

all in all, 5/5 on this phone if i get the Drive/Maps situation squared away
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
D

Deleted member 14629

Guest
I've been on the phone with AT&T for over an hour today, and chatted with Nokia - i've been told by both that it is restricted.

Why be on the phone with support? Just go to Marketplace -> Nokia collection and they'll be listed. Am I missing something? Does your Nokia Apps section not have them?

I agree. If the Nokia apps aren't there, it's an instant return for me. Not because the phone isn't great, but because that's one hell of a bait and switch.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

moonshine

Ars Scholae Palatinae
748
mobinga":lookrjgj said:
name99":lookrjgj said:
mobinga":lookrjgj said:
I've never understood why consumers who have nothing to do with a corporation, except giving them money for products, are so interested in sales or how well certain products from certain companies fare in the market... Some of these deluded fanboys just need to die.

PS: Who owns the ugly finger nails in the photos? Get rid of that bullshit you put on your nails.

Casey is young and a girl. She is fully entitled to have fun with her life, and if that includes putting decorations on her nails, or dying her hair multi-colored, or whatever, so be it.
There'll be plenty of time for her to live a more staid and buttoned-down life once she hits middle-age.

And, just as a friendly hint, "You have ugly finger nails. Get rid of that bullshit." is generally not a winning line, or a winning attitude, when it comes time to try to find a partner of your own. You're probably a decent person, so try to work on softening these rather coarse edges of your personality.

Well done. Captain "save a girl". Now please shut up.


moonshine":lookrjgj said:
mobinga":lookrjgj said:
sprockkets":lookrjgj said:
mobinga":lookrjgj said:
I've never understood why consumers who have nothing to do with a corporation, except giving them money for products, are so interested in sales or how well certain products from certain companies fare in the market... Some of these deluded fanboys just need to die.

PS: Who owns the ugly finger nails in the photos? Get rid of that bullshit you put on your nails.

And when did you become the CTO of the planet?

Your 38 posts here are mostly drivel as well. Why don't you follow your own advice? On second thought, I don't need to wait, I'll just block you...

sep332":lookrjgj said:
Seriously, I saw the headline and thought, "I hope Casey did this one" and sure enough! It's funny though because she had almost opposite opinions on everything compared to Joshua Topolsky's review over on The Verge. He loved the style, didn't like the camera, etc. Opinions FTW :)

mobinga":lookrjgj said:
PS: Who owns the ugly finger nails in the photos? Get rid of that bullshit you put on your nails.
Ah, I'd forgotten who was complaining about Casey's fingernails. Blocked.


LMAO. Catching feelings over a post online? To the extent of blocking?
You lot belong to the category of humans who cry over a video game ending.
You must have no lives, go outside often.

If you're being a dick on purpose - bravo.

Otherwise, STFU while the adults talk. Capiche?

Yeah, I would. Don't you have a Mass Effect ending to cry about?

Sorry mate. I couldn't give two shits about the whole ME thing. Farts in the wind.

Why not try not being so hostile in your comments? You can make a good argument around here without the attitude.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

jeffp3456

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
108
Subscriptor
having spent some time with the phone, what i didn't like (not specific to nokia) is that the status bar (signal strength, clock, etc) is only visible on the lock screen. i was in a restaurant using the web and only after a while did i realize that i was not connected to their wifi, thus wasting data minutes when i didn't have to.

also there was a lot of att crapware on the lengthy text menu which i understand can be removed but was still annoying....
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
D

Deleted member 14629

Guest
having spent some time with the phone, what i didn't like (not specific to nokia) is that the status bar (signal strength, clock, etc) is only visible on the lock screen. i was in a restaurant using the web and only after a while did i realize that i was not connected to their wifi, thus wasting data minutes when i didn't have to.

You don't have to lock the screen to see it. If you swipe from the top of the phone, the status bar will appear with your signal, time, battery, etc. They did that to give you extra screen real estate for what you're actually doing, since needing those statuses is only a "sometimes" thing.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

AlfieJr

Smack-Fu Master, in training
84
well, here is another "grade on the curve" softball review, pretending that the Lumia 900 is not an obviously mediocre product.

the review itself details the display's mediocrity. and the camera's mediocrity. and the browser's mediocrity. and how the battery failed to last for a full day's typical use - the basic goal for any smartphone (and the number one problem for any current LTE phone).

and those are just the big issues. four big things consumers really do care about. then plus many more particular items.

to have been the "breakthrough" Windows/Nokia phone that so many are looking for (with rose colored glasses, apparently) Nokia will need to (1) match the iPhone retina display's quality, (2) match the iPhone camera's (and software) everyday-siutations picture quality,(3) match both iPhone and Android browser performance, and (4) solve the LTE power/battery technology challenge to deliver full-day battery life (which this year's iPhone 5 will surely achieve).

but the price is 5% lower! yeah, ok ... save $100, get a third rate product, great deal.

most of the "pro" blogsphere is pulling its punches on the 900. why? because they want a real smartphone 'horse race' to write about to drive page views, and MS/Nokia is hopefully their New Kid In Town (or more accurately, two old kids come back in new duds for one last try together).

it's gonna flop.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Happysin":1dsauvlm said:
They did that to give you extra screen real estate for what you're actually doing, since needing those statuses is only a "sometimes" thing.
Between the giant icons and the large columns of empty black space for one little button, it's hard to believe that real estate was actually a concern when Microsoft created this OS.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Puma720

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
141
AlfieJr":27ogmy5l said:
well, here is another "grade on the curve" softball review, pretending that the Lumia 900 is not an obviously mediocre product.

the review itself details the display's mediocrity. and the camera's mediocrity. and the browser's mediocrity. and how the battery failed to last for a full day's typical use - the basic goal for any smartphone (and the number one problem for any current LTE phone).

and those are just the big issues. four big things consumers really do care about. then plus many more particular items.

...

but the price is 5% lower! yeah, ok ... save $100, get a third rate product, great deal.

most of the "pro" blogsphere is pulling its punches on the 900. why? because they want a real smartphone 'horse race' to write about to drive page views, and MS/Nokia is hopefully their New Kid In Town (or more accurately, two old kids come back in new duds for one last try together).

it's gonna flop.

Do you think either company will ever release sales figures? Because I was going to ask what your definition of "flop" would be, in terms of sales, but then I realized it's a moot point if Microkia are too ashamed to ever release the numbers, like they have been so far with WP.

My cut-off point for a Lumia "flop" would be 1M device sales. If they can hit that number within the first few months, then that would be an indication that the platform isn't completely stagnant. It doesn't sound too impressive compared to 850,000 Android device activations (of all types and models) per day, but it would be respectable, especially given that this is last year's OS running on 2010 hardware. If they never announce sales figures, then I strongly suspect that they couldn't even hit the 1M mark for their flagship device.

As for pulling punches, did you see what the commenters did on Josh Topolsky's review on The Verge?

http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/3/292147 ... 900-review

Beware there are 2500+ comments and they all load into a single threaded view on the page. You may not have enough RAM to load all the comments on an iPad or phone. Anyway, a huge number of obnoxious flames against the reviewer, calling him incompetent and stupid, an Apple fanboy and an Android fanboy, etc. They ended up spending 90 minutes on this week's Vergecast defending the review against the religious zealotry of the WP fans hating on the reviewer for being "biased", because he only gave it a 4 for ecosystem and 5 (of 10) for software, and a 7.0 overall.

http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/6/293032 ... 04-06-2012

So I think the reviewers are just trying to be as gentle and polite as possible to avoid riling up this resentful group of platform defenders, who seem about 10x as bad as the worst Amiga, OS/2, etc. and other "doomed platform" zealots we've seen (and I was an Amiga fanboy so I know the frustration they're feeling).
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

KevinN206

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
127
jeffp3456":1e2xbhw6 said:
having spent some time with the phone, what i didn't like (not specific to nokia) is that the status bar (signal strength, clock, etc) is only visible on the lock screen. i was in a restaurant using the web and only after a while did i realize that i was not connected to their wifi, thus wasting data minutes when i didn't have to.

also there was a lot of att crapware on the lengthy text menu which i understand can be removed but was still annoying....
You can view your battery, signal, and wifi status by tapping on the top from the homescreen. However, Windows Phone will not automatically connect to an AP if you have never connected to it at least once before. So if you did not connect to the restaurant wifi before, then WP7 will not connect to that wifi even if it's a non-protected wifi. I think Android and iOS do the same thing.

For example, when I'm at work, my HD7 automatically connects to my company's non-protected wifi (yes, it's not protected but restricted). If for some reason that pubic wifi has issue (quiet often), then my HD7 will automatically connected to the company's restricted wifi.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

warpozio

Smack-Fu Master, in training
98
Those issues and the benchmarks aside, we found that the Lumia 900 actually loads pages fairly quickly. It doesn't beat the iPhone 4S at loading any of our test pages, by any means, but at least beats out the iPhone 4 while on WiFi.

Lucky for the Nokia Lumia 900 that it can beat a phone which was released almost 2 years ago (June 24, 2010)
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
D

Deleted member 14629

Guest
augustofretes":nrrks1k9 said:
How is it better than the iPhone 4? Please give me a reason to believe it, because I'm unable to find one (beyond LTE and the design).

"Please tell me how it's better than an iPhone 4, aside from the things about it that are better than an iPhone 4".

That's how that came across.

My take is the iPhone 4 is a solid phone. That said, I think the Lumia 900 is a better phone for these reasons.

1. LTE really is that much faster if you're in an area that has LTE
2. The phone doesn't feel like it's going to break if I look at it wrong. I'm not even putting a case on mine. It feels like a return to form of the indestructible Nokia.
3. It performs better on many tasks than an iPhone 4 (though as the review points out, not the 4s). It's solidly fast all around.
4. This last one is strictly opinion. WP7's interface is better than iOS. I liked iOS when I used it, but it always felt dense, like it was easy to lose app icons on the screen. I have never felt what with WP7. Everything feels like it has to space to breathe. Now, there are many complaints about the opposite, about WP7 being too spacious with its layout. I can understand those, but on the whole, I would rather a mobile device err on the side of not overwhelming me. I don't have hard proof behind this claim, but I feel like the extra time it takes to move between multiple screens to get where I want in WP7 is still faster than actually finding the info I want on an information-dense iPhone screen.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Fri13

Smack-Fu Master, in training
53
Happysin":2uyqb35o said:
What do you mean failure? They specifically designed email so it will notify you in every relevant way, except interrupting what you're doing. you can even have it ping at you letting you know a new mail came in. How is not interrupting you a bad thing? You still know it came in, you just don't have to stop what you're doing until you're ready.

Now there are Microsoft fans fighting for the Microsoft.

The question was never about "Do I get notification about email and how many of them there are?"
But the question was about "Do I find out from WHO and WHAT was subject of email what I just got"

So if you get a notification (sound, vibration, icon to lock screen or start screen) it doesn't help at all.

Why?

Task: User is example reading a news article. Waiting that other person would answer a email. And then email is received.

Question: How easily can user find out from WHO and WHAT ABOUT that email is?

In Android, user get a notification to bar showing from who and what is subject. Without doing ANYTHING. Only thing what user needs to do is to look the notification bar and it scrolls sender and subject informations.

If user have missed that, user can see sender and subject on lock screen (if phone was in pocket) or pull a notification bar down (one swipe) and see sender, subject and first words.

No need at all to switch away to launcher or open lock screen etc.

And user can see all information from one place, amount of emails, amount of SMS, amount of IM, amount of twitter messages, amount of facebook messages...... Even from who and what they are about. No need at all to open any application. No need to close current application. No need to unlock lock screen.

Example. This morning at glance I could see that I had three MMS with pictures from cousin, seven emails and from those three were news lists and four from different persons, two missed calls (I have calls muted until 8am) from two different person, two comment on facebook photos what were posted yesterday evening, I have two meeting today and one reminder, one friend sent few IM messages and that my hotspot was activated (automatically for coffee browsing on laptop).

And I did not need to open any app. I didn't need to switch home screens etc.

From emails, I could see easily from whom and what they were about. Without need to launch email application. I saw who was trying to call and who sent pictures trough MMS and who commented and what.

It is just ironic that when it comes to usability, multitasking and clear information, Windows Phone phone users need to scroll, launch applications, swap between applications and gather information by them self from all available data.

And more you use windows phone phones, more it comes cluttered, hard to use, slow and even laggy. It is a nice system for first time but after a while, it is a totally different than what was told.
If user has just few facebook friends, few SMS messages now and then, few emails and one calender and then use browser, it is good. Not perfect but good. But more and more you demand from that device to fill daily complex needs and tasks, it just hits the wall with "No can do" -limitation.

Example, Android can offer (depending screen size) 4x4 +5 or 5x5+5 (or between them like 4x5 +5) amount of space what to use for icons, folders and widgets.

If user has a eight game or eight bookmark, you don't need place all of them to one screen. You create a folder and you place that folder where you want. Now in 1x1 size there are groupped lots of data. You can even mix them if wanted. They can even be a emails or people or almost anything you want. Like one folder (what can include as many as needed space) can be made for specific school project or class. A another folder for all emails and messages and contact data from family members. And they are live as well....
And those would just take two 1x1 space, so you have left 4x4+5 -2 = 19. And when you can have nearly infinite amount of home screens and always have those 5 bottom (can be as well scrollable so you can have 5xY on there) you can just make ANYTHIGN you need. And still have everything groupped as well in app/widget drawer, accessible with search, filter or just scrolling.

Microsoft fans can say what ever they like, but Windows Phone does not get close to usability and flexibility what Android offers to the user.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
D

Deleted member 14629

Guest
Task: User is example reading a news article. Waiting that other person would answer a email. And then email is received.

Question: How easily can user find out from WHO and WHAT ABOUT that email is?

In Android, user get a notification to bar showing from who and what is subject. Without doing ANYTHING. Only thing what user needs to do is to look the notification bar and it scrolls sender and subject informations.

Simple counterpoint. If you're like most people I know, your email on your phone is scheduled to get mail at scheduled intervals, and not just on-demand. That means, for me, when it checks mail, I could be sitting through 5-10 of those little popups in the notification bar. To me that seems extremely annoying and silly. I guess I can see it if someone's volume of mail is low enough they're only getting them on occasion, but stacked mail, like my normal way to interact with mail, makes that concept obnoxious.

As I mentioned before, I don't think that the way you mention is bad, but it's a design decision MS didn't invest time in for good reasons. That's why I haven't been fanboying it and saying everyone should use mail that way, and explicitly pointed out that there are other mobile OSs that work in an interrupt-driven way if you prefer that.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Happysin":18os3jum said:
As I mentioned before, I don't think that the way you mention is bad, but it's a design decision MS didn't invest time in for good reasons. That's why I haven't been fanboying it and saying everyone should use mail that way, and explicitly pointed out that there are other mobile OSs that work in an interrupt-driven way if you prefer that.

I'd hate to see you when you are fanboying something, then. Considering how you harped on all the research MS has done and how you went on and on about how it's just better that way when I suggested that, perhaps, MS should provide the option to the user even if they keep it disabled by default, and all.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Fri13

Smack-Fu Master, in training
53
Happysin":1xmg4vtx said:
Simple counterpoint. If you're like most people I know, your email on your phone is scheduled to get mail at scheduled intervals, and not just on-demand. That means, for me, when it checks mail, I could be sitting through 5-10 of those little popups in the notification bar. To me that seems extremely annoying and silly. I guess I can see it if someone's volume of mail is low enough they're only getting them on occasion, but stacked mail, like my normal way to interact with mail, makes that concept obnoxious.

A: You do not need to go trough the emails on notification bar but you can simply dismiss all at once if you want to get notification per email.

B: You can place email client to notify only once from new email, but not after that so you need to check emails or clear email notifications to get one notification from new email again.

C: It is more popular to use push feature than check every XY minutes. But thanks to Android settings, you can set it exactly as thank Microsoft forced you to have, or you can set Android to work wise manner.

D: You do not need to care about notification at all if you don't want. But it is just visible at glance and quickest access to email. Windows Phone just is slower and harder on that area as well than Android (or iOS). And quess what, with Android you can choose totally different notification systems or ways if you don't like what Android offers by default.

As I mentioned before, I don't think that the way you mention is bad, but it's a design decision MS didn't invest time in for good reasons. That's why I haven't been fanboying it and saying everyone should use mail that way, and explicitly pointed out that there are other mobile OSs that work in an interrupt-driven way if you prefer that.

The problem is that it is only a Microsoft way or a highway. User has no word about what is BEST FOR HIM/HER.

That is the biggest flaw what Windows Phone phones have, and it is that user does not have change to tailor the phone for THEIR needs and demands. It is always only a Microsoft way or highway.

Windows Phone phones are all same kind. No differences at all based user needs. If you don't fit the target group what Microsoft targets, then you are out of luck.

With Android, every user can tailor their phone exactly as they want or keep them as vanilla. They do not need to learn anything new or change their needs but let the technology change and reflect users needs and demands.

It is like typical pre-made suit for everyone VS tailored suit per customer. Every person has different needs and demands and tailored one is best for everyone, while pre-made is bad from there and here and does not fit so well for most people.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
D

Deleted member 14629

Guest
heartburnkid":ekfh3pgk said:
Happysin":ekfh3pgk said:
As I mentioned before, I don't think that the way you mention is bad, but it's a design decision MS didn't invest time in for good reasons. That's why I haven't been fanboying it and saying everyone should use mail that way, and explicitly pointed out that there are other mobile OSs that work in an interrupt-driven way if you prefer that.

I'd hate to see you when you are fanboying something, then. Considering how you harped on all the research MS has done and how you went on and on about how it's just better that way when I suggested that, perhaps, MS should provide the option to the user even if they keep it disabled by default, and all.

If you go back, my argument was strictly about allocating development resources and support. MS made a decision to not support another notification method to email, and use their dev resources elsewhere. I was defending their choice to do so, based on how they were working with their OS. Nothing more. True, I pointed out that I liked it, but that was strictly some personal input, not an assessment of other people choosing mobile OSs that support other notification methods. When it comes down to it, MS placed other development priorities above that specific feature, and I'm ok with that.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

ScifiGeek

Ars Legatus Legionis
19,138
Puma720":36m9r4tb said:
Do you think either company will ever release sales figures? Because I was going to ask what your definition of "flop" would be, in terms of sales, but then I realized it's a moot point if Microkia are too ashamed to ever release the numbers, like they have been so far with WP.

My cut-off point for a Lumia "flop" would be 1M device sales. If they can hit that number within the first few months, then that would be an indication that the platform isn't completely stagnant. It doesn't sound too impressive compared to 850,000 Android device activations (of all types and models) per day, but it would be respectable, especially given that this is last year's OS running on 2010 hardware. If they never announce sales figures, then I strongly suspect that they couldn't even hit the 1M mark for their flagship device.

As for pulling punches, did you see what the commenters did on Josh Topolsky's review on The Verge?

http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/3/292147 ... 900-review

Beware there are 2500+ comments and they all load into a single threaded view on the page. You may not have enough RAM to load all the comments on an iPad or phone. Anyway, a huge number of obnoxious flames against the reviewer, calling him incompetent and stupid, an Apple fanboy and an Android fanboy, etc. They ended up spending 90 minutes on this week's Vergecast defending the review against the religious zealotry of the WP fans hating on the reviewer for being "biased", because he only gave it a 4 for ecosystem and 5 (of 10) for software, and a 7.0 overall.

http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/6/293032 ... 04-06-2012

So I think the reviewers are just trying to be as gentle and polite as possible to avoid riling up this resentful group of platform defenders, who seem about 10x as bad as the worst Amiga, OS/2, etc. and other "doomed platform" zealots we've seen (and I was an Amiga fanboy so I know the frustration they're feeling).

My main disappointment with the Verge is that they still haven't fixed that comment system since complaints about keeping all comments on one page. Hell it chokes the browser on my 3.2GHz quad core with 6GB of RAM.

The review seems like a return to honesty after all the WinPhone astroturfing we have seen. Yeah, WP7 fanboys may be few, but they try to make up for it, by being louder and more annoying.

FWIW, I still have my Amiga 1000. :D
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

fuxxx

Ars Scholae Palatinae
802
Subscriptor
name99":2luqky7g said:
K1LLTACULAR":2luqky7g said:
Just wanted to stop by and probably restate this point by emphasizing that oleophobic screens are merely coated and said coating normally wears off within a few months, depending on several factors.

This was clearly NOT the case for both my iPad1 and iPhone4, both of which I bought pretty much on the day they were released, and which I have used constantly since then.

Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if other brands do, indeed, skimp on the quality of their oleophobic coating.
My 1.5 year old iPhone 4 gets rainbow grease every time I use it. It's definitely been cured of its oleophobia.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Status
Not open for further replies.