I think the issue is that the show was better off being a three or four season affair instead of trying to drag it out to five. The writing got sloppier in the latter seasons, and I ended up tuning out myself.I liked seasons 1 and 2, but 3 and 4 were just OK. They seem to be trying to one up the crudeness/gore of previous episodes and it's getting a little old. I understand that it has always been a part of the show, and I'm OK with that to a point, but the story should be front and center, not the shock value.
I'll give S5 a shot. Didn't even know there was a spinoff (GenV). Hopefully I don't have to watch that to understand S5. I'm not really interested.
I'm pretty sure that if the "offended audience" hasn't gotten the message by now, they never will.It's a series that has gone on too long. Also, while I understand that there are a lot of people who misunderstood the messaging of the show so they course corrected by replacing ANY subtext with direct text, in practice, all this did was drive off the people who actually needed to hear the message while worsening the quality of the show... because it turns out subtext is good writing sometimes. I have no idea what the answer is, if using it means people think Homelander is a hero, but going direct means driving those people away so they don't hear your message at all, but being in that rock and a hard place, I'd err towards focusing on good writing so that it's at least entertaining.
If you think really hard, I bet that you can find a large swath of the US population who thought he was the good guy until the writers literally came out and said it to their faces that he wasn't.I've only watched season 1 (a bit too gory for my taste) so maybe I'm missing some further development in mind, but I have a hard time imagining anyone seeing Homelander as a good guy? How is that even possible?
Yeah, because, they apparently see nothing wrong with him threatening his co-workers with murder on an almost daily basis, nor secretly experimenting on babies, nor murdering people to cover up experimenting on babies, nor shaking down cities, and entire countries for exorbitant sums of money.If you think really hard, I bet that you can find a large swath of the US population who thought he was the good guy until the writers literally came out and said it to their faces that he wasn't.
I agree with other sentiments here; the show was great in the first 2 seasons when the commentary was more subtle and nuanced, but kinda fell off the rails when they had to resort to South Park levels of pronouncement which distracted from the subtleties of the characters and made them caricatures instead.
Also, while I understand that there are a lot of people who misunderstood the messaging of the show so they course corrected by replacing ANY subtext with direct text
If you think really hard, I bet that you can find a large swath of the US population who thought he was the good guy until the writers literally came out and said it to their faces that he wasn't.
Multiple things can be true.It's a series that has gone on too long. Also, while I understand that there are a lot of people who misunderstood the messaging of the show so they course corrected by replacing ANY subtext with direct text, in practice, all this did was drive off the people who actually needed to hear the message while worsening the quality of the show... because it turns out subtext is good writing sometimes. I have no idea what the answer is, if using it means people think Homelander is a hero, but going direct means driving those people away so they don't hear your message at all, but being in that rock and a hard place, I'd err towards focusing on good writing so that it's at least entertaining.
(cough) Cinnabon (cough)I'm pretty sure that if the "offended audience" hasn't gotten the message by now, they never will.
I liked the recent season of Gen V. They didn't have to wallow through all the character introductions they did in S1, they had a decent Big Bad - at least for the first half+ of the season - and the inevitable tie-in with The Boys finale gave them something to build to beyond the end of this season.I watched seasons 1-4, and S1 of Gen V.
I guess I'll see it through? I'm burned out on it though.
Gen V especially made me want to just take a shower after watching it. And I'm not even talking about the obvious gross out stuff, giant dick etc, just the whole social media influencer etc stuff feeling a little too on the nose.
Gen V especially made me want to just take a shower after watching it... just the whole social media influencer etc stuff feeling a little too on the nose.
I liked the recent season of Gen V. They didn't have to wallow through all the character introductions they did in S1, they had a decent Big Bad - at least for the first half+ of the season
Same. I enjoyed the Anti-hero series of 1 and 2, where I was just inundated with the whole Marvel Comics movies and series that this was a breath of fresh air.I liked seasons 1 and 2, but 3 and 4 were just OK. They seem to be trying to one up the crudeness/gore of previous episodes and it's getting a little old. I understand that it has always been a part of the show, and I'm OK with that to a point, but the story should be front and center, not the shock value.
I'll give S5 a shot. Didn't even know there was a spinoff (GenV). Hopefully I don't have to watch that to understand S5. I'm not really interested.
I feel like The Boys has always been a weird mix of extremely on-point satire and overwrought gross-out violence and physical humor that goes too far, and it always makes me wonder if the satire is an afterthought to dumb violence porn that goes too far for shock value, or whether the ultraviolence going too far is making a point as considered as the satire and I'm missing it because I assume it's just for shock value, but either way, yeah, I'm burned out on it too.I watched seasons 1-4, and S1 of Gen V.
I guess I'll see it through? I'm burned out on it though.
Gen V especially made me want to just take a shower after watching it. And I'm not even talking about the obvious gross out stuff, giant dick etc, just the whole social media influencer etc stuff feeling a little too on the nose.
It feels like she was in the cast solely to get them out of one particularly hairy situation.I liked the recent season of Gen V. They didn't have to wallow through all the character introductions they did in S1, they had a decent Big Bad - at least for the first half+ of the season - and the inevitable tie-in with The Boys finale gave them something to build to beyond the end of this season.
I could have done without Bushmaster, but she had a fairly small role.
I've only watched season 1 (a bit too gory for my taste) so maybe I'm missing some further development in mind, but I have a hard time imagining anyone seeing Homelander as a good guy? How is that even possible?
I wonder if that "offended audience" even exists or if it's just a made-up marketing gimmick. The "Conservatives hate this show!!!" rhetoric seems like a way to make conversation around this show be about real-world political fighting rather than the quality of the show itself.I'm pretty sure that if the "offended audience" hasn't gotten the message by now, they never will.
If you think really hard, I bet that you can find a large swath of the US population who thought he was the good guy until the writers literally came out and said it to their faces that he wasn't.
I agree with other sentiments here; the show was great in the first 2 seasons when the commentary was more subtle and nuanced, but kinda fell off the rails when they had to resort to South Park levels of pronouncement which distracted from the subtleties of the characters and made them caricatures instead.
Before? The first season came out during the first Trump presidency.Seasons 1 and 2 happened before we had a completely unhinged, megalomaniacal Neo-Nazi running the government.
Now the show hews too close to the bone.
I would agree. Once the show came on, I went and reread the comic series which I had collected as it came out. There are major differences from the start but sort of work if you squint and say that the first two seasons were an alt universe before the comic started. Anyway, the comic humor was certain more juvenile and edgelordy, the story less serious, and the final ending (after Homeland's demise) sort of a let down.I hope they change the ending. it was kinda hokey.
Won't go into details for risk of spoilers, but most of the changes from the source material have been a positive.
I was getting tired of it too. And while, I'm not going to watch the spin-off, I'll watch the final season. I think I'll be able to figure out whatever I missed from skipping the spin-off. And if not, who cares, it's just a TV show, If I don't grasp every plot point it's no biggie.I was a big fan of season 1-3, I quit watching halfway through season 4. The show just lost me.
Now they expect me to watch a spinoff in addition to season 4 to catch up on everything that has happened. I dont know about that.
There are actual people who think Trump is a good guy. Real living people.I've only watched season 1 (a bit too gory for my taste) so maybe I'm missing some further development in mind, but I have a hard time imagining anyone seeing Homelander as a good guy? How is that even possible?
Same here, no way I’m sitting through a bunch of ads on top of my over-a-hundred dollar subscription to Amazon just to watch a bunch of blood and gore.Hero worship is a Nazi desire too, but their idea of a 'hero' is not one that would include Superman, the 60's and 70's X-Men, or the Spider-verse characters.
Edited to add: (I haven't seen any of this; I swore off all things Amazon many years before this series was conceived.)
It's not unlike all these billionaires who come away from CyberPunk literature thinking the MegaCorps are the good guys.Yeah, because, they apparently see nothing wrong with him threatening his co-workers with murder on an almost daily basis, nor secretly experimenting on babies, nor murdering people to cover up experimenting on babies, nor shaking down cities, and entire countries for exorbitant sums of money.
I think it was literally Episode one, or maybe Ep 2, where we saw him murder for the first time (that is, that's the first time WE saw him murder, but then we find out he has been murdering for awhile, which shouldn't have come to anyone as a surprise by that point).
But I bet you're right that a whole bunch of people (mostly men, but there seem to be some women highly supportive of fascism) who thought he was the good guy despite all the clear evil he was doing.
Shouldn't be necessary. You may miss some of the finer character points, but nothing of any serious import I'd think.Like some of the other posters, I hope it turns out not to be necessary to have watched Gen V to follow Season 5. I'm still interested enough to check out Season 5, but not so interested that I want to watch Gen V.
deep cognitive issues?How is that even possible?